The Big Cat Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Below is a comparison between the roster (including reserves) from week 17 2012 and week 6 2013. I wanted to bring it up re: Levitre, that only so many changes can happen in one offseason--in this case HALF the roster being gutted. Anyways. Take a look, I'm curious as to what thoughts come to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Turnovers! Ummmm! Seriously, we had some old and bad and bad old players on the DLine, LB corps and DBs. The QB position's been atrocious for years and has been reasonably addressed - but I look for them to draft another QB in 2014. I think we'll be stable at WR for a few years, but the OL needs to be addressed in the Draft/FA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Putrid???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Putrid???? That turnover looks quite fresh to me! I remember doing similar research as TBC did when Levi took over as GM and compared him to Donna-ho. Bottom line is a team that churns its HC and staff over every three years will be doing the same to their roster. Whaley's young. Hopefully he lasts and can have a decent shot at rebuilding a winning franchise here. It doesn't happen in a single year. I think they've made strides in the right directly, but it will all be for naught if we get a new HC in 2015. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Speadsheets make football seem more like work. My observation; I see a lot of red green and white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted October 9, 2013 Author Share Posted October 9, 2013 Speadsheets make football seem more like work. My observation; I see a lot of red green and white. At a glance: we completely revamped our QB's, our LB's, our DB's and added key players to the DL. Since we all agree LG hasn't cost us any games, I think it's important to note that expectations for addressing the "most replaceable position in football" should be tempered accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 Hey, there were already a lot of threads on "Buddy left the roster in better shape than the one he inherited." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted October 9, 2013 Share Posted October 9, 2013 At a glance: we completely revamped our QB's, our LB's, our DB's and added key players to the DL. Since we all agree LG hasn't cost us any games, I think it's important to note that expectations for addressing the "most replaceable position in football" should be tempered accordingly. What, was powerpoint not available? "Mmmmmyeah I'll need those TPS reports by Tuesday." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts