C.Biscuit97 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Chris Johnson is averaging 3.7 ypc. He averaged 4.5 last year. Good thing the Titans paid Levitre big money and drafted a G in the top 10. Guards don't win games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Pro_Bills Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 My point was that they could have gotten a better player for $8m/yr. The fact that they didn't bothers me, but it is the fact they didn't use the money on any player, rather than the fact that they didn't use it on Levitre, that bothers me. The real problem is the Bills had no 'Plan B' here and the value of Levitre is relative to the alternatives the team has available. Which given what we've seen from the play at the LG position all season was nothing much. Maybe he wasn't worth $8 Mil per season but facing the alternative of a substandard offensive line (with a rookie QB) it might have made sense in that situation. Especially when you have no cap issues to contend with. If you've got another player ready that will give you the same or close to the same level of play then making the decision solely based on money might make sense. Look at the Steelers for example. They've let players walk (LB, WR etc.) during the course of time because they had other players on the bench being groomed that could fill the spot. The mistake the Bills have consistently made is not re-signing players at a position where they have no viable back up on the roster and then they fail to acquire legitimate alternatives. Letting players go based on a proven system of roster and cap management is one thing but letting them go and having it result in your team being weaker or creating a hole is a good way to 'run in place' forever. Let's see if this Brandon/Whaley/Marrone team approaches this differently or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Levitre was this team's MVP for the last 4 years. Durable, versatile, good. That we have failed so spectacularly to find his replacement proves how badly the FO did on this one. I don't miss levitre but I do miss having someone reliable out there, regardless of name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 when are people gonna learn the key to a great offense is 4 pro bowlers on the offensive line. Will Wilford, Jim Ritcher, Kent Hull, John Davis, House Ballard = 4 trips to the Super Bowl things get easier when you have 10 seconds to throw or holes you can run a truck through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 when are people gonna learn the key to a great offense is 4 pro bowlers on the offensive line. Will Wilford, Jim Ritcher, Kent Hull, John Davis, House Ballard = 4 trips to the Super Bowl things get easier when you have 10 seconds to throw or holes you can run a truck through. John Davis deserved Pro Bowl honors as well. I doubt we'll ever a group like this again. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
l< j Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 when are people gonna learn the key to a great offense is 4 pro bowlers on the offensive line. Will Wilford, Jim Ritcher, Kent Hull, John Davis, House Ballard = 4 trips to the Super Bowl things get easier when you have 10 seconds to throw or holes you can run a truck through. In today's NFL? What team has that level of talent on the OL this season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homey D. Clown Posted December 17, 2013 Author Share Posted December 17, 2013 Play at the LG positon was a difference maker. I am not saying Levitre is worth $8M for every team, but that really isn't the point. His most value was to the Bills right here and right now. The Bills have been paying about $20M per victory in payroll over the last decade so an argument certainly could be made that just one more win would have justified Levitre's contract. In a couple years, if his skills eroded it releasing him wouldn't be a hindrance. The salary cap will jump significantly in a couple years when the new TV money kicks in. Lastly, for all the apologists.........I gotta say if the replacements for Levitre have been so bad is it fair to assume is that those defending the Levitre decision think that the "braintrust" of Nix/Whaley/Marrone are just complete idiots who accidentally got it right by not signing Levitre. You can't possibly be serious about that statement. I'd say a few key fumbles, interceptions, and the continued inability to stop anyone from catching a pass downfield had everything to do with it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris heff Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 The real problem is the Bills had no 'Plan B' here and the value of Levitre is relative to the alternatives the team has available. Which given what we've seen from the play at the LG position all season was nothing much. Maybe he wasn't worth $8 Mil per season but facing the alternative of a substandard offensive line (with a rookie QB) it might have made sense in that situation. Especially when you have no cap issues to contend with. If you've got another player ready that will give you the same or close to the same level of play then making the decision solely based on money might make sense. Look at the Steelers for example. They've let players walk (LB, WR etc.) during the course of time because they had other players on the bench being groomed that could fill the spot. The mistake the Bills have consistently made is not re-signing players at a position where they have no viable back up on the roster and then they fail to acquire legitimate alternatives. Letting players go based on a proven system of roster and cap management is one thing but letting them go and having it result in your team being weaker or creating a hole is a good way to 'run in place' forever. Let's see if this Brandon/Whaley/Marrone team approaches this differently or not. At the time I thought over paying Levitre was a bad idea, but in retrospect the lack of plan B is alarming. The Bills had to know they were drafting a QB and that the rookie QB would be starting at some point. Having a good o line that had played together was key. They should have paid Levitre. The protection has not been great and the run blocking has been bad. Manuel, as with all QBs, is much better with a running game. The line now needs a LG and a RT. I hope they can address at least one of these in free agency. What happened with Hairiston? It was a non football injury. Is he done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 At the time I thought over paying Levitre was a bad idea, but in retrospect the lack of plan B is alarming. The Bills had to know they were drafting a QB and that the rookie QB would be starting at some point. Having a good o line that had played together was key. They should have paid Levitre. The protection has not been great and the run blocking has been bad. Manuel, as with all QBs, is much better with a running game. The line now needs a LG and a RT. I hope they can address at least one of these in free agency. What happened with Hairiston? It was a non football injury. Is he done? I'm hoping Hairston comes back as well. He showed promise and would be an immediate upgrade over Pears at RT. Pears is having an abysmal season. I think Gailey's scheme didn't expose him as much. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 (edited) They actually raved about how fitz came in and brought the team back... all I saw were the crippling interceptions... Well, that is Fitz...a gambler who will dazzle you, but more often than not, will come up short... I like the guy a lot, and he is easy to root for, but he will break your heart at every turn... that int in OT last week was just brutal...and "so Fitzy!" Would still love him as a backup...I will say, after watching Trent Edwards for a few years, and now EJ, and their tentative, overly catious ways, Fitz willingness to chuck it up is kind of refreshing. Edited December 17, 2013 by Buftex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 John Davis deserved Pro Bowl honors as well. I doubt we'll ever a group like this again. GO BILLS!!! yes he did Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Well, that is Fitz...a gambler who will dazzle you, but more often than not, will come up short... I like the guy a lot, and he is easy to root for, but he will break your heart at every turn... that int in OT last week was just brutal...and "so Fitzy!" Would still love him as a backup...I will say, after watching Trent Edwards for a few years, and now EJ, and their tentative, overly catious ways, Fitz willingness to chuck it up is kind of refreshing. Last year's offense with this year's defense. Think about it, Bills fans. Now think about how quick we are to bash EJ. Notice a pattern? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Well, that is Fitz...a gambler who will dazzle you, but more often than not, will come up short... I like the guy a lot, and he is easy to root for, but he will break your heart at every turn... that int in OT last week was just brutal...and "so Fitzy!" Would still love him as a backup...I will say, after watching Trent Edwards for a few years, and now EJ, and their tentative, overly catious ways, Fitz willingness to chuck it up is kind of refreshing. Fitz would have been the perfect backup/ mentor to EJ. I laughed at those trying to say Kolb was an upgrade over Fitz. fitz gets every ounce out of physical ability he has out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 In today's NFL? What team has that level of talent on the OL this season? no one.... i'd say SF comes closest in todays game, but still not as good as that group of Bills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsVet Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Chris Johnson is averaging 3.7 ypc. He averaged 4.5 last year. Good thing the Titans paid Levitre big money and drafted a G in the top 10. Guards don't win games. Can you go one post without citing stats to defend your opinion? It's more nuanced than numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Last year's offense with this year's defense. Think about it, Bills fans. Now think about how quick we are to bash EJ. Notice a pattern? We're averaging 0.1 less points than last year and that includes the Tuel start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Fitz would have been the perfect backup/ mentor to EJ. I laughed at those trying to say Kolb was an upgrade over Fitz. fitz gets every ounce out of physical ability he has out. we have the perfect backup now, his name is EJ.....now go get a Franchise QB with 5 all pro lineman.....RB's & WR's are dime a dozen. other than QB, stop investing in guys who weigh under 290. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Can you go one post without citing stats to defend your opinion? It's more nuanced than numbers. Another great point. A nearly 1 yard dropoff in a running back ypc when talking about a guard isn't a valid point at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 we have the perfect backup now, his name is EJ.....now go get a Franchise QB with 5 all pro lineman.....RB's & WR's are dime a dozen. other than QB, stop investing in guys who weigh under 290. Easy as pie...I mean, look at how many teams have done it in the last 20 years! There's no possible way that this is a serious post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted December 17, 2013 Share Posted December 17, 2013 Easy as pie...I mean, look at how many teams have done it in the last 20 years! There's no possible way that this is a serious post. oh i am serious........you start by drafting LT Jake Mathews or LT Taylor Lewan......assuming a QB is not worthy at our pick (around 10th). put that rookie at RT and move Pears to LG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts