LeviF Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 You may be right. The first post was mostly BS as I though the judge might appreciate it but the winning formula is clearer now. Glad we had fun with that but my comment that you are a sitting duck in round two was a serious one. Only favoritism by the judge (again) will keep you alive. For the record, I think Snyder should fight these idiots to the very end and ride the wave of public support that should happen as these overly sensitive groups step up their attack. Honestly I don't even know what's going on. I've been deep in the k-hole for like 68 of the past 72 hours.
keepthefaith Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 And to judge.... Thank you for putting this contest together and allowing me to continue. Should be a fun ride for everyone tuned in.
3rdnlng Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 I've been hanging around PPP lately because of this competition. I thought it was a great idea and hoped to be entertained for some time with it. I was a little concerned that it was going to be judged by one individual.....but I can live with that. I became put off a bit further when it became apparent that aggressive insults were going to be viewed as a positive rather than a negative....but as that would add an extra element of colour to the dialogue I was content with that also. Then I saw the topic for the 2nd debate. Which aspect of the scourge that is Hollywood has done more damage to our country in the last 30 years.....sex or violence? The question of "Has Holywood sex and violence damaged the country?" would be a debatable topic. To question which one has caused more damage, when there is a questionable premise of whether either has actually done any damage makes it a non debatable topic. It would be a bit like asking if it is the QB or Coach that has had more of an influence on why the Cowboys are currently a great team. You should understand that this competition is not about saving the polar bears or deciding the fate of the homeless. It is about discussion/debating skills. Most any subject would do, but why not make it as juicy as possible? I fully expect that before this contest is over there will be a debate on whether plowing the forest is better than poking the shaved mound.
Dibs Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 You should understand that this competition is not about saving the polar bears or deciding the fate of the homeless. It is about discussion/debating skills. Most any subject would do, but why not make it as juicy as possible? I fully expect that before this contest is over there will be a debate on whether plowing the forest is better than poking the shaved mound.
Dibs Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 What is your point? If it was about discussion/debating skills then not only would people be marked down(instead of up) for aggressively insulting their opponent......but the topics would have to be ones that could actually be intelligently debated.
GG Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 If it was about discussion/debating skills then not only would people be marked down(instead of up) for aggressively insulting their opponent......but the topics would have to be ones that could actually be intelligently debated. What brought you to PPP again?
Chef Jim Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 What brought you to PPP again? He even apologized to me in another thread over here.
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 He even apologized to me in another thread over here. I'm sorry, too man
Chef Jim Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 I'm sorry, too man That you're a dumbass?? I don't accept those apologies.
GG Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 He even apologized to me in another thread over here. He ate your cooking?
Chef Jim Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 He ate your cooking? Shouldn't that apology come from me?
GG Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 Shouldn't that apology come from me? It could have been a consoling kind of an apology.
Dibs Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 What brought you to PPP again? Glutton for punishment. He even apologized to me in another thread over here. Yeah, sorry for that.
Tiberius Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 That you're a dumbass?? I don't accept those apologies. No! That I take advantage of your stupidity
keepthefaith Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 No! That I take advantage of your stupidity You have a chance in this competition to go deep which should significantly improve the entertainment quality for the rest of us. This is your big chance to shine.
boyst Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 You have a chance in this competition to go deep which should significantly improve the entertainment quality for the rest of us. This is your big chance to shine. what are the odds he even makes the finals?
keepthefaith Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 what are the odds he even makes the finals? Very high if the judge wants to keep the best punching bag in the competition.
boyst Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 Very high if the judge wants to keep the best punching bag in the competition. thinking of crayonz as a judge. Yeah. You're right
BillsFanM.D. Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 I just have to say...Rob's first post was a good opening salvo on the topic and his line about "Larry Flynn and his mouth whore lawyer..." is an instant classic. That's some good stuff. I suspect he and tgreg are going to be a good scrap. Since opinion's are like backsides I'll also add this....the first round was great. KTF and Levi both had me laughing a good bit. I'm glad both 'survived.' Crayola may be a tad 'off' but I think he's created a true monster with this concept. Let the entertainment continue.
Recommended Posts