Azalin Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 No kidding. I guess I forget where I am sometimes. They're very sensitive over "there". I guess I can understand with 13 plus years of craptastic football I'd be sensitive to someone pointing out how foolish I was spending my hard earned money supporting them. I'd been away from here for a long time, and I was a bit shocked at the degree of rudeness with which people address eachother here nowadays. it didn't take me long to appreciate it, though....both for the humor of it as well as for the freedom to vent.
4merper4mer Posted October 4, 2013 Author Posted October 4, 2013 (edited) The field has been completed. We'll start Monday. All 16 must be prepared. I will announce the topic either Sunday night or Monday along with the first two participants. If they agree on sides they want, fine. If not sides will be assigned by the judge. Me. Edited October 7, 2013 by 4merper4mer
4merper4mer Posted October 7, 2013 Author Posted October 7, 2013 keepthefaith and LeviF91 will kick this off. The topic is: Should the Washington Redskins change their name? The thread is up.
4merper4mer Posted October 7, 2013 Author Posted October 7, 2013 Birdog1960.....or for this contest Chickendog1960. Throw your insults around in here...not the individual argument threads. Why were you too Chicken to play?
Chef Jim Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 Birdog1960.....or for this contest Chickendog1960. Throw your insults around in here...not the individual argument threads. Why were you too Chicken to play? Something about a doctor that can't follow simple instructions that is scary...very scary.
4merper4mer Posted October 7, 2013 Author Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) Something about a doctor that can't follow simple instructions that is scary...very scary. Not following instructions is one thing. Being a chicken is another. You can get by in life either way. But both? A chicken that doesn't follow instructions? And chicken of a thread on a message board. Wow. Edit: He took down his post so he is following instructions. Thanks Chickendog1960. I appreciate it. Edited October 7, 2013 by 4merper4mer
4merper4mer Posted October 7, 2013 Author Posted October 7, 2013 Pretty solid start by LeviF91 I think. He was too nice to easy target keepthefaith but we are just getting started after all.
Tiberius Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 Pretty solid start by LeviF91 I think. He was too nice to easy target keepthefaith but we are just getting started after all. I agree, nice job Levi! His point 4 about guys named bill?? Lame, lol, but the rest was good
birdog1960 Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 (edited) Birdog1960.....or for this contest Chickendog1960. Throw your insults around in here...not the individual argument threads. Why were you too Chicken to play? been occupied all day. taking a break to respond... so, is this the dumb and dumber school of "debate"? anecdotes and personal insults encouraged and an overtly partisan solitary judge and rule maker . brilliant !! for you, possibly. for everyone else it sucks. why would i or anyone else jump into a fight of trivial import knowing it was blatantly unfair? patriotism? honor? um, no. stupidity is the only reason imaginable. fun? i suppose for those that entered that's the justification but i like to win and don't like rigged games. i removed my post in the sacred game thread and will refrain from further posting there or here again unless provoked. hmmm, wonder how long that might take? Edited October 7, 2013 by birdog1960
Rob's House Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 been occupied all day. taking a break to respond... so, is this the dumb and dumber school of "debate"? anecdotes and personal insults encouraged and an overtly partisan solitary judge and rule maker . brilliant !! for you, possibly. for everyone else it sucks. why would i or anyone else jump into a fight of trivial import knowing it was blatantly unfair? patriotism? honor? um, no. stupidity is the only reason imaginable. fun? i suppose for those that entered that's the justification but i like to win and don't like rigged games. i removed my post in the sacred game thread and will refrain from further posting there or here again unless provoked. hmmm, wonder how long that might take? Or to summarize: "Your grapes are sour!"
birdog1960 Posted October 7, 2013 Posted October 7, 2013 Or to summarize: "Your grapes are sour!" nope. i love debate, but that term implies well defined parameters. without those it's simple (often in every sense of the word) discourse which i'm happy to participate in. when a winner is to be chosen without rules in a game, it is simply pointless and stupid.
4merper4mer Posted October 7, 2013 Author Posted October 7, 2013 Or to summarize: "Your grapes are sour!" No he is just chicken. He is making up excuses because he thinks he would lose. I do appreciate him removing that post though. It was a nice gesture. Anyway, he called me partisan but I don't even know what that means. If it is something political it is wrong because I am not into politics. If it is a crack about my hair then he knows nothing about style. This contest will be judged fairly by the judge. Me. To summarize: chicken.
4merper4mer Posted October 8, 2013 Author Posted October 8, 2013 Good retort by keepthefaith albeit with some iffy arguments. A nice shot lobbed at LeviF91 but a little mild if you ask me. Personally I find it hard to believe that Nantucket, Cheektowaga or Harrisburg could support an NFL franchise. A good start by both but pwnage has not been achieved. Keep working guys. New arguments or rebuttals...whatever you prefer.
boyst Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 I am surprised neither of them mentioned a motivator to change it - money. If they rebrand themselves as the Washington Redstars then they can sell a ton of new merchandise.
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 I am surprised neither of them mentioned a motivator to change it - money. If they rebrand themselves as the Washington Redstars then they can sell a ton of new merchandise. Since Birdog wrongly hinted that I might actually be DCTom I've been just seething. That aside, go back and read Keepthefaith's response to levi and you'll see he addressed your suggestion. Do you have any reading comprehension whatsoever you idiot and !@#$ing moron?
boyst Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 Since Birdog wrongly hinted that I might actually be DCTom I've been just seething. That aside, go back and read Keepthefaith's response to levi and you'll see he addressed your suggestion. Do you have any reading comprehension whatsoever you idiot and !@#$ing moron? haHa I miss tom. It doesn't ring the same when you do it. FWIW, I have a busy life and a lot of poo goes in my head so I don't retain errythang on PPP.
Tiberius Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 Good retort by keepthefaith albeit with some iffy arguments. A nice shot lobbed at LeviF91 but a little mild if you ask me. Personally I find it hard to believe that Nantucket, Cheektowaga or Harrisburg could support an NFL franchise. A good start by both but pwnage has not been achieved. Keep working guys. New arguments or rebuttals...whatever you prefer. Levi by a mile so far! I'll say Levi has the better side, but keepthefaith put forth a pretty lame argument, IMO
3rdnlng Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 ha Ha I miss tom. It doesn't ring the same when you do it. FWIW, I have a busy life and a lot of poo goes in my head so I don't retain errythang on PPP. Well of course it's not the same, I'm not that phucking pond scum who thinks arguing with Crocofschitboy is a fun pastime. Now go back to inseminating your cows, you backwoods hillbilly who thinks farting contests are the highlight of the week's entertainment.
boyst Posted October 8, 2013 Posted October 8, 2013 Well of course it's not the same, I'm not that phucking pond scum who thinks arguing with Crocofschitboy is a fun pastime. Now go back to inseminating your cows, you backwoods hillbilly who thinks farting contests are the highlight of the week's entertainment. female sperm (xy) are heavier then male cattle sperm (XX) because they have more chromosomes. They are also chewier, IMO. To sex the semen they pass it thru a straw with a charge. Females are attracted to one side. Male another. Sperm not able to be charged are discarded and usually about 10% or less of the total collection. The semen can also be cloned, as is being done in the dairy world.
Recommended Posts