Kemp2Warlick Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 Pro Football Focus @PFF5m There's a new man atop our Race for Rookie of the Year. And that man is Sheldon Richardson. See who else ranks https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/10/01/race-for-rookie-of-the-year-week-4-2/ …
26CornerBlitz Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 Pro Football Focus @PFF5m There's a new man atop our Race for Rookie of the Year. And that man is Sheldon Richardson. See who else ranks https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2013/10/01/race-for-rookie-of-the-year-week-4-2/… Not sure why they're lumping all rookies in together when there will be an award for both OROY and DROY.
K D Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 Unfortunately for PFF you need actual stats to be voted ROY. It's an interesting evaluation but I think the voters are more about stats like sacks, int's, tackles, etc. Unless Richardson has a ton of sacks, I doubt he gets it over someone like Kiko who might end up with double digit int's. Their system of + and - isn't the standard
dollars 2 donuts Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 If the Bills finish with at least 9 wins and EJ throws for 20 or more TDs with less than 15 interceptions I think he would be the leading candidate.
Tsaikotic Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 (edited) not sure why they have him over Kiko at all..he has a total of 19 tackles and 1.5 sacks...for a DT I can see that as pretty good for a rookie but he's a DE that should have a bit better stats for being seen as top guy for ROY...they don't even have E.J. listed on the list at all...not even in the rookies to watch section...they do have Woods though..anyways, if you multiply their current stats by 4 you get: S. Richardson = 76 tackles , 6 sacks Kiko Alonso = 128 tackles, 4 sacks, 4 FF, 16 Ints, 4 fumble recoveries not exact science but hmm..who looks better??...plus how much better does Kiko look if 3 or 4 of those int's are pick six.. Edited October 1, 2013 by Tsaikotic
boyst Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 not sure why they have him over Kiko at all..he has a total of 19 tackles and 1.5 sacks...for a DT I can see that as pretty good for a rookie but he's a DE that should have a bit better stats for being seen as top guy for ROY...they don't even have E.J. listed on the list at all...not even in the rookies to watch section...they do have Woods though..anyways, if you multiply their current stats by 4 you get: S. Richardson = 76 tackles , 6 sacks Kiko Alonso = 128 tackles, 4 sacks, 4 FF, 16 Ints, 4 fumble recoveries not exact science but hmm..who looks better??...plus how much better does Kiko look if 3 or 4 of those int's are pick six.. if Alonso gets 16 picks I'll eat my underpants.
Gugny Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 if Alonso gets 16 picks I'll eat my underpants. I printed this then had it notarized. I also mailed a hard copy to Beerball.
Tsaikotic Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 if Alonso gets 16 picks I'll eat my underpants. I printed this then had it notarized. I also mailed a hard copy to Beerball. lol..not saying he will..just doing that stats thing that "professional's" like to do to try to predict what players will do after 1/4 of play...
Sisyphean Bills Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 If the Bills finish with at least 9 wins and EJ throws for 20 or more TDs with less than 15 interceptions I think he would be the leading candidate. Interesting that Manuel is not even mentioned in that piece.
Recommended Posts