Fezmid Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Troy Brown half-raises his hand up, and the refs don't call him for illegal fair catch signal. That *should* have been a penalty. I've seen it called before. You can't "pretend" to call a fair catch. CW
GG Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Just a hypothetical. What do Pats OL have to do to get called for holding?
MadBuffaloDisease Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Answer: stop paying-off the refs before the game.
DC Tom Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 GG said: Just a hypothetical. What do Pats OL have to do to get called for holding? 207545[/snapback] I think, at a minimum, they have to be traded to another team first... I've seen defenders have their jerseys torn by Pats' linemen, and holding STILL isn't called. It's ridiculous...
GG Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 DC Tom said: I think, at a minimum, they have to be traded to another team first... I've seen defenders have their jerseys torn by Pats' linemen, and holding STILL isn't called. It's ridiculous... 207548[/snapback] At least Phil Simms in on our side.
Thailog80 Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 GG said: At least Phil Simms in on our side. 207556[/snapback] No way he loves the Patriots. Im sure the NFL will sanction him for saying NE got away with a hold.
macdaddy Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 GG said: Just a hypothetical. What do Pats OL have to do to get called for holding? 207545[/snapback] Blitzer had a clear path and two, I repeat two, lineman reach out and grab him> WTF????
TheMadCap Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 a nice non-call for clipping on that last PR...
KurtGodel77 Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Well, at least the refs know how to call holding on the Colts. Gees . . .
GG Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Yeah, and so much for the rule that tie of possession go to the offense. This is nearing obscene again.
Fezmid Posted January 16, 2005 Author Posted January 16, 2005 GG said: Yeah, and so much for the rule that tie of possession go to the offense. This is nearing obscene again. 207604[/snapback] I was thinking the same thing, although at least this one wasn't as clear-cut as some of the others (such as the illegal fair catch, holding, etc). CW
Ralonzo Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 GG said: Yeah, and so much for the rule that tie of possession go to the offense. This is nearing obscene again. 207604[/snapback] "The Patriots are saying they have the ball... and they're going to give it to them!!"
TheMadCap Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Ralonzo said: "The Patriots are saying they have the ball... and they're going to give it to them!!" 207611[/snapback] Priceless quote from the TV peanut gallery!
Ralonzo Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Is that before or after the "false start" on Manning during the direct snap. Nobody has explained to me how he was simulating the start of a play yet.
T-Bone Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Gee what happened to that high powered Colts offense....
BF_in_Indiana Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 T-Bone said: Gee what happened to that high powered Colts offense.... 207627[/snapback] The Patriots are cheating EVERY play. Haven't you read?
BF_in_Indiana Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Ralonzo said: Is that before or after the "false start" on Manning during the direct snap. Nobody has explained to me how he was simulating the start of a play yet. 207625[/snapback] If he had done that in a shotgun formation it would have been legal.
IDBillzFan Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 BF_in_Indiana said: The Patriots are cheating EVERY play. Haven't you read? 207629[/snapback] Why am I not surprised to see you and T-Bone getting along and agreeing with each other. Maybe he'll make you a Patsy fan, given how passionate you are about watching them win today.
Recommended Posts