Hammered a Lot Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 on the non fumble call @ the 2:11 make 2nd qtr eagles vikes game.What the hell does that mean?
GG Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 on the non fumble call @ the 2:11 make 2nd qtr eagles vikes game.What the hell does that mean? 207383[/snapback] He needed to have both feet in bounds after stepping out, before he could touch the ball.
nodnarb Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 if a defender goes out of bounds on a play, he has to re-establish himself by getting both feet on the field before he can claim a live ball, be it on a fumble or INT. It was the right call, but they explained it poorly.
Hammered a Lot Posted January 16, 2005 Author Posted January 16, 2005 I saw that he had one foot in bounds than fell on the ball. Thanks for explaining, I thought it was a new "Patriots" rule of some sort.
Thailog80 Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 I saw that he had one foot in bounds than fell on the ball. Thanks for explaining, I thought it was a new "Patriots" rule of some sort. 207391[/snapback] No...those start at 4:45pm today.
rockpile Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 Thanks for explaining, I thought it was a new "Patriots" rule of some sort. 207391[/snapback]
JimBob2232 Posted January 16, 2005 Posted January 16, 2005 I understand the ruling...but why the rule? It doesnt make sense to have that rule at all. There must be a reason
Recommended Posts