BringBackFergy Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 Too bad Hillis wasn't available... No ****...that would be !@#$in sweeet
l< j Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 thanks for !@#$in nothing. !@#$ Looking for the middle finger smiley and I can't !@#$in find it!
I'm Spartacus Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 I'm sorry, but why Fullbacks? We all saw our depleted cornerback group, plus the lack of talent thereof. The front office should be bringing in any & all veteran corners to see what we can do to improve. If we weren't so thin at corner, I believe Rogers would have been cut Monday morning.
YoloinOhio Posted September 24, 2013 Author Posted September 24, 2013 I'm sorry, but why Fullbacks? We all saw our depleted cornerback group, plus the lack of talent thereof. The front office should be bringing in any & all veteran corners to see what we can do to improve. If we weren't so thin at corner, I believe Rogers would have been cut Monday morning. The article said there were more players coming in today but that was just the fullback group that was in this morning.
Big Turk Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 Too bad Hillis wasn't available... He is, was cut by the Bucs last week...no thanks, the dude is an !@#$...
dpberr Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 I'm going to supress the inital thought that the front office and this coaching staff is trying to out-think the room by getting cute holding fullback workouts while more apparent needs are not having workouts. Are we going to run the wishbone offense on Sunday versus the Ravens? (arguably that would be VERY cool.) The best fullback in the league wouldn't have stopped half those sacks last Sunday.
MDH Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 What I wouldn't give for the Bills to coax Winfield out of retirement. Guy is still better than anyone on the Bills not named Gilmore.
RyanC883 Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 Hopefully the next round is corners: Clements and Trufant
Sisyphean Bills Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 "You can never have too much veteran depth at fullback," said no coach.
RyanC883 Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 "You can never have too much veteran depth at fullback," said no coach. hahahah. Wouldn't mind one, but odd its the first group they bring in. They really need more O-line depth.
Maybe Someday Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 (edited) I for one am happy the FB is finally being addressed. Maybe now all of our running plays won’t start from shotgun. Also, I think we should sign Payton Hillis (at least for a week anyways) so that he can have a chat with Byrd the turd and let him know that he really needs to get his a$$ on the field or risk his career going in a downward spiral. Edited September 24, 2013 by cnico
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 "You can never have too much veteran depth at fullback," said no coach. Awesome. Doug Whaley's to-do list: 1) Try out a dozen FB's, and decide to stick with Summers, but deactivate him for the games. 2) Cut Dan Carpenter, or keep him, but ask him to trim his mullet? 3) What to do about our long-snapper? Can we bring in some more competition for Sanborn? Need to always look to get better at LS! 4) Lunch
YoloinOhio Posted September 24, 2013 Author Posted September 24, 2013 What I wouldn't give for the Bills to coax Winfield out of retirement. Guy is still better than anyone on the Bills not named Gilmore. A friend who is a Vikings fan said he can still tackle better than most of the league but can't really cover anymore. But still.... I hear you. Awesome. Doug Whaley's to-do list: 1) Try out a dozen FB's, and decide to stick with Summers, but deactivate him for the games. 2) Cut Dan Carpenter, or keep him, but ask him to trim his mullet? 3) What to do about our long-snapper? Can we bring in some more competition for Sanborn? Need to always look to get better at LS! 4) Lunch Does he go home after lunch?
DC Tom Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 A friend who is a Vikings fan said he can still tackle better than most of the league but can't really cover anymore. But still.... I hear you. So he's a Rogers who can tackle? I'm sold.
Mike in Syracuse Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 Conner would be a good fullback which they rarely use.....but he's no help on special teams Oh really? Id say knocking the snot out of would be tacklers is helpful! Oh and this: http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/09000d5d81d6354f/John-Conner-terminates-Bills
tennesseeboy Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 We need a blocking fullback to ward off all those onrushing defensive linemen and give Manuel time to pass? I've got an idea...why don't we get some actual offensive linemen to hold them up a bit at the line of scrimmage?
BringBackFergy Posted September 24, 2013 Posted September 24, 2013 I can't read the article who are the 4 Icky Woods, Earl Campbell's nephew's college room mate, Doug Whaley's Fantasy Football league commissioner and Carwell Gardner
Recommended Posts