Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You say this but if any of those guys dropped it then you would be signing a different tune. He is used to returning punts unlike the others.

 

you mean kind of like if JL dropped it or got hurt, or those guys got a good return you would be?

 

im looking at it as a decision making process and our secondary can ill afford another hit, while our WRs are in good shape. id rather have a more explosive backup at a healthy unit back there than a healthy guy at a decimated group who is essentially a punt catcher at this point in his career.

Posted

 

 

you mean kind of like if JL dropped it or got hurt, or those guys got a good return you would be?

 

im looking at it as a decision making process and our secondary can ill afford another hit, while our WRs are in good shape. id rather have a more explosive backup at a healthy unit back there than a healthy guy at a decimated group who is essentially a punt catcher at this point in his career.

Or he was he best PR we had to put out.

Posted (edited)

 

Or he was he best PR we had to put out.

 

which is a subjective decision that some in this thread are saying they weight different attributes and aspects of the call in a way that our coaching staff doesnt.

 

while JL may have the most reliable hands/tracking of the ball, he is way more valuable at safety given the state of our secondary than easley is at WR and not as explosive as a guy like easley.

Edited by NoSaint
Posted

 

 

which is a subjective decision that some in this thread are saying they weight different attributes and aspects of the call in a way that our coaching staff doesnt.

 

while JL may have the most reliable hands/tracking of the ball, he is way more valuable at safety given the state of our secondary than easley is at WR and not as explosive as a guy like easley.

Posted

If this thread goes on long enough someone is bound to spell Matt Leinart's last name correctly when referring to Jim Leonhard.

×
×
  • Create New...