Max997 Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 (edited) There is no creativity in the offense whatsoever If they are going to be conservative bc of EJ then dump the up tempo BS bc you can't hv a conservative faced paced offense I don't get Hacketts thinking calling the same running play all game long especially when it never seems to work very well I don't get why the middle of the field is ignored Edited September 23, 2013 by Max997
Not at the table Karlos Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 With chan fitz and this defense we would be 10-6 , 11-5. I feel the same way
Max997 Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 With chan fitz and this defense we would be 10-6 , 11-5. You mean the defense that gave up 500 yards to a pathetic Jets offense today?
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 With chan fitz and this defense we would be 10-6 , 11-5. Absolutely. Chan's undoing was Wannstedt. Chan was an unbelievably smart offensive mind. Hackett is a rookie.
Reed83HOF Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 Absolutely. Chan's undoing was Wannstedt. Chan was an unbelievably smart offensive mind. Hackett is a rookie. There really was no reason to get rid of the offense that we had. It scored points it moved the ball etc....We should have kept some of the playbook
RuntheDamnBall Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 I agree, Hackett is going through some growing pains. For all Gailey's weaknesses and stubborness, he designed fantastic plays that worked very effectively at getting guys open Time and again Gannon showed how the Bills receivers were covered up with nowehre to throw the ball, even when EJ had some time. Ryan is just a great DC and the Jets are one of the few teams that can bring presure but still give you nowhere to throw the ball as the same time. This. Sometimes you've gotta tip your hat. Our talent is not good enough yet - not in protection and not at TE, which are two areas that can really help if you're trying to beat a Rex Ryan defense. The hole at LG needs to be filled, and a great receiving TE would do wonders for this team.
Not at the table Karlos Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 I have seen plays where every receiver runs ten yards and stands there, I think the int on the pass to tj was one of them. Every time I see this play the defense has it covered perfectly and there is almost no chance it works yet hack calls again. Everyone and their grandmothers knows what is coming its so frustrating watching
filthymcnasty08 Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 Hackett CLEARLY grew up playing Madden...his play calling is on par with the 19 y.o. stoners playing Madden over the internet.
Big Turk Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 EJ looked like a rookie today, no surprise there. Horrible protection all day, major footwork issues. That last throw out of bounds was made off one foot at a horrible angle. No way to get an accurate throw like that. Just terrible pass pro, and no scheme at all by Hackett to make things easier for his rookie QB. Where does one start? All kinds of called runs on 1st down= 2nd and longs all day. Anyone should know the Jets run D will not give you any 1st down yardage. No screens to slow down the rush. No boots or play action. Hackett is pretty awful as a coordinator and his "rookieness" showed even more than EJ's to any seasoned football observer. You can't hide a rookie QB, but you don't play right into the teeth of the defense either. Hackett was absolutely schooled today. Yeah, remember how good our screen game was last year under Gailey? Possbily best in NFL. EJ did run a naked boot for a first down today, a play I was screaming for against Carolina on 3rd and goal from the 2 last week on the series we threw 2 fade passes on 2nd and 3rd down...he would have walked into the endzone last week... Absolutely. Chan's undoing was Wannstedt. Chan was an unbelievably smart offensive mind. Hackett is a rookie. Yeah, Gailey was a brilliant play designer. I dunno whats worse, seeing guys running wide open but not having a QB that can get them the ball or having good enough players but having them all covered because of poor play design... Absolutely. Chan's undoing was Wannstedt. Chan was an unbelievably smart offensive mind. Hackett is a rookie. Yeah, Gailey was a brilliant play designer. I dunno whats worse, seeing guys running wide open but not having a QB that can get them the ball or having good enough players but having them all covered because of poor play design...
Coach Tuesday Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 Yeah, Gailey was a brilliant play designer. I dunno whats worse, seeing guys running wide open but not having a QB that can get them the ball or having good enough players but having them all covered because of poor play design... Yeah, Gailey was a brilliant play designer. I dunno whats worse, seeing guys running wide open but not having a QB that can get them the ball or having good enough players but having them all covered because of poor play design... You can say that again.
VADC Bills Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 (edited) No designing a scheme utilizing Spiller in space. No bubble screens to speed receivers. No HB screens to Jackson or Spiller. No use of rollouts and taking advantage of a mobile quarterback. No misdirection No use of clock management before half-time. What do you guys think? Hackett is in way over his head. You have summed up what I have been feeling in the first 3 weeks. Especially on the your first 3 points.Screens would have worked like a charm today. Edited September 23, 2013 by VADC Bills
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 My problems with hacketts scheme: 1) Playbook is too limited. With some formation differences, to my eye, it looks like we come into the game with maybe 5 base running and 6-7 base passing plays. It just becomes way too predictable when you are running so few plays. 2) play calls are too obvious based on down. A lot of jauron specials-- run, run, pass. (He could probably benefit if we slowed things down, so he could take more time to think through the calls). 3) not enough "trick" or "misdirection" plays. What I mean by this is not only gadget plays, but draws, screens, play action roll outs, reverses, etc. 4) redzone play calling. Really bad and predictable.
jumbalaya Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 Correct me if I am wrong (as if that is a problem for this board) but, at the end of the first half we had the ball 3rd and long around our 30 with 50-some seconds left, Jets have one time out. We line up and snap the ball with 24 seconds on the play clock. Other than say Philadelphia, what major league team would not have bled the clock down to about 30 seconds or forced the opposing team to call its final time out??? No we throw pass. What supreme utter stupidity. They don't do this crap in high school. Cost us a field goal. Hackett should have been taken off the mike then and there.
KD in CA Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 EJ looks like he is in over his head TBH. Hackett wasn't the guy throwing out of bounds. Was EJ telling the receivers to keep running patterns straight down the sideline? The rookie QB isn't supposed to bailing out the clueless OC.
billsfanmiami(oh) Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 Correct me if I am wrong (as if that is a problem for this board) but, at the end of the first half we had the ball 3rd and long around our 30 with 50-some seconds left, Jets have one time out. We line up and snap the ball with 24 seconds on the play clock. Other than say Philadelphia, what major league team would not have bled the clock down to about 30 seconds or forced the opposing team to call its final time out??? No we throw pass. What supreme utter stupidity. They don't do this crap in high school. Cost us a field goal. Hackett should have been taken off the mike then and there. Hard to believe but you're right. Sticking to this crap with no regard for the situation will continue to get us nowhere fast.
Reed83HOF Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 With a rookie QB, installing a new Offense shouldn't Hackett be on the sidelines with his players? I hate coaches who stay in the box upstairs. Hackett should be down there with EJ and the offense showing the the print outs and going over what the D is doing... Oh wait what am I talking about Hackett only knows 6 plays
RuntheDamnBall Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 CJ Spiller up the middle... could we eliminate this from the playbook? There's a reason the guy got hurt today. He is not built for that ****. He is built for taking it to the house on a bubble screen or bursting through on a play action. There is not one good reason this team can't use both him and FredEx, yet no one seems to be able to come up with the formula.
billsfan714 Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 You read Hacketts resume and its pretty underwhelming. Prior NFL offense coaching exerrience, offensive quaility control coach of the 2006-7 Bucs and 2008-9 Bills, that isnt even coordinator or a position coach. I think he's finding out it was a lot easier game planning for defenses like WVU's swiss cheese or the likes of UConn, and Pitt. 2003 2003 2004 2005 2006-2007 2008-2009 2010 2011-2012 2013-present University of California, Davis (Assistant Linebackers Coach) Stanford University (Offensive Assistant) Stanford University (Coordinator's Assistant) Stanford University (Recruiting Coordinator) Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Offensive Quality Control) Buffalo Bills (Offensive Quality Control) Syracuse University (Quarterbacks/Tight Ends) Syracuse University (Offensive Coordinator) Buffalo Bills (Offensive Coordinator)
KOKBILLS Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 I don't think EJ can throw screens TBH he puts to much touch on his throw so by the time it gets to the RB half the defense is there. That's what practice is for... We were one of the best screen teams in the NFL last year...You think Hackett and Marrone would have picked up on that fact...They better come up with something other than running into the middle of the line for no gain on 1st Down...Then doing the same on 2nd down...It's really pathetic... That being said I fully expected the Jets D to play well in this game...And I fully expected EJ to struggle a bit in his first NFL road game...What I did not expect was the Jets to hit two deep balls for TD's...That was the difference in the game IMHO...The Offense was terrible, but if we have Gilmore, McLovin, and Brooks out there at CB I think the Bills actually win this game...
RuntheDamnBall Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 You read Hacketts resume and its pretty underwhelming. Prior NFL offense coaching exerrience, offensive quaility control coach of the 2006-7 Bucs and 2008-9 Bills, that isnt even coordinator or a position coach. I think he's finding out it was a lot easier game planning for defenses like WVU's swiss cheese or the likes of UConn, and Pitt. 2003 2003 2004 2005 2006-2007 2008-2009 2010 2011-2012 2013-present University of California, Davis (Assistant Linebackers Coach) Stanford University (Offensive Assistant) Stanford University (Coordinator's Assistant) Stanford University (Recruiting Coordinator) Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Offensive Quality Control) Buffalo Bills (Offensive Quality Control) Syracuse University (Quarterbacks/Tight Ends) Syracuse University (Offensive Coordinator) Buffalo Bills (Offensive Coordinator) I'm sorry, are we talking about boobs here?
Recommended Posts