texasabres Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 I was rewatching the game, and on the sack Mario shared with Dareus, Cam fumbled the ball. The refs called in the grasp over the mic. Watching in super slowmo, I am sure that the ball is out before Dareus makes contact. So either Cam fumbled and the sack is shared (w/ Bills recovery) or the call is dead before Dareus hits and Mario has a full sack. This play was important, because the next play is the pre-punt holding that led to the touchdown. In retrospect, I'm glad we didn't review because had we lost we could not stop the clock later. But they might reconsider the play for Mario's sake. Did anyone else look at that play? What am I missing?
dayman Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 lol take the win get pumped about the team and look to next week...let that one go
Bangarang Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 We won and got to watch EJ orchestrate a last minute drive which may mean more for his development than we can imagine. Time to move on to the Jets.
texasabres Posted September 17, 2013 Author Posted September 17, 2013 Totally with you on that one. But I just don't get the logic. Does "in the grasp" mean that the player has no chance? I don't understand why Dareus gets the .5 sack on that one.
mitchmurraydowntown Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 Dareus is bigger than the guy who does the stats, that is all.
Big Turk Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 Huh, not understanding the title...even if it was ruled a fumble it still is considered a sack
Braedenstearns Posted September 17, 2013 Posted September 17, 2013 I was rewatching the game, and on the sack Mario shared with Dareus, Cam fumbled the ball. The refs called in the grasp over the mic. Watching in super slowmo, I am sure that the ball is out before Dareus makes contact. So either Cam fumbled and the sack is shared (w/ Bills recovery) or the call is dead before Dareus hits and Mario has a full sack. This play was important, because the next play is the pre-punt holding that led to the touchdown. In retrospect, I'm glad we didn't review because had we lost we could not stop the clock later. But they might reconsider the play for Mario's sake. Did anyone else look at that play? What am I missing? Im confused also. But yes I did think it was a fumble.
Recommended Posts