DC Tom Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Ya, like that can't be fixed Wasn't the ACA supposed to fix that, not exacerbate it?
B-Man Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 (edited) Obama Admin Pushes Second Obamacare-Enrollment Start Past 2014 Election The Obama administration will unilaterally change the second-year start of enrollment for Obamacare from October 15, 2014, to November 15, 2014, according to a Bloomberg report. This move puts the next enrollment period after the 2014 midterm elections, potentially delaying another increase in premiums that could harm Democratic reelection prospects in the House and Senate. An unnamed official with the Department of Health and Human Services said the delay is to allow insurance companies to assess rates following the first year of the government-run marketplaces, and allow consumers more time to learn about their options. W. Va. Rejects Extending Canceled Health-Insurance Policies Keystone Good News for Living Good News The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania yesterday issued a preliminary injunction keeping the dioceses of Pittsburgh and Erie, and social-service organizations including Catholic Charities from having to comply with the Department of Health and Human Services abortion-drug, contraception, female-sterilization mandate. This is the first preliminary injunction granted to religious non-profits under HHS’s final rule. {snip} The Obama administration’s “accommodation” for religious liberty is no such thing and forces choices between conscience and service that are simply not American. Thankfully, another court has seen this, for now. A small step toward the protection of religious liberty in America. . . Edited November 22, 2013 by B-Man
4merper4mer Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Great, so how exactly is a 32 year old gay man protected by having the policy he liked cancelled in accordance with the dictates of HHS and the ACA, and now being forced to pay more money than he was paying so that his new policy can include maternity care? Dude have you watched modern family? Gay couples can adopt so maternity care is not unrealistic.
B-Man Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Dude have you watched modern family? Gay couples can adopt so maternity care is not unrealistic. That would be "pediatric" care...............not Maternity..............................................dude. .
4merper4mer Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 That would be "pediatric" care...............not Maternity..............................................dude. . Maybe dude.....................if the baby has bad feet........................but if someone is feeding the baby a bottle that is maternalistic................dude
B-Man Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Maybe dude.....................if the baby has bad feet........................but if someone is feeding the baby a bottle that is maternalistic................dude but not healthcare/insurance related................................you know .
DC Tom Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 but not healthcare/insurance related................................you know But since gay adoptions are always of foreign kids...................................................................................................................it falls under international treaty...............................................................................................................................................................................................so the federal government can regulate it............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................so it's covered by the ACA, of course................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................as soon as Obama holds the press conference to amend it.
4merper4mer Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 but not healthcare/insurance related................................you know . What if the baby needs a special formula? You know like a baby with a prosthetic leg that needs formula or mother's milk with antibionics? Look, the point is that men can be moms too and so they might need maternity care and if they do, it should be billable on their insurance.
B-Man Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 What if the baby needs a special formula? You know like a baby with a prosthetic leg that needs formula or mother's milk with antibionics? Look, the point is that men can be moms too and so they might need maternity care and if they do, it should be billable on their insurance. Look, I'm sorry, everything you're describing is under Pediatric Care I've been a nurse for 35 years...............there is no male/maternity care, no matter what type of Modern Family you have. .
DC Tom Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 What if the baby needs a special formula? You know like a baby with a prosthetic leg that needs formula or mother's milk with antibionics? Look, the point is that men can be moms too and so they might need maternity care and if they do, it should be billable on their insurance. Which brings up a good point...prosthetic leg formula is covered under the ACA as required pediatric care, but it's also taxed because it's for a medical device. How fair is that?
4merper4mer Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Look, I'm sorry, everything you're describing is under Pediatric Care I've been a nurse for 35 years...............there is no male/maternity care, no matter what type of Modern Family you have. . Have you ever been on AJZepp's web show? What about if a guy got implants so he could breast feed and then had them removed when the kid turned 7? Maternity. I'm just saying that there is a lot of stuff so people should be covered.
Joe Miner Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Have you ever been on AJZepp's web show? What about if a guy got implants so he could breast feed and then had them removed when the kid turned 7? Maternity. I'm just saying that there is a lot of stuff so people should be covered. Now insurance can't deny him of his preexisting condition of not having breasts.
Koko78 Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Have you ever been on AJZepp's web show? What about if a guy got implants so he could breast feed and then had them removed when the kid turned 7? Maternity. I'm just saying that there is a lot of stuff so people should be covered. How would silicone implants help a male with breast feeding?
Gary M Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Like in how I think the government should provide health care to it's citizens, right? The ACA is about insurance not care
Chef Jim Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 How would silicone implants help a male with breast feeding? It's better to watch??
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 How would silicone implants help a male with breast feeding? Not all breast implants are silicone. Duh.
B-Man Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 BLOOMBERG: Public Approval of ObamaCare Hits New Low. There’s no doubt press failed to scrutinize Obamacare until now Progress: ObamaCare website taking slightly longer to crash for users than it did before
Azalin Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 The ACA is about insurance not care now you're just clouding the issue with facts, for which there is no room in the mind of an emotionally driven partisan.
Nanker Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 Obama Admin Pushes Second Obamacare-Enrollment Start Past 2014 Election The Obama administration will unilaterally change the second-year start of enrollment for Obamacare from October 15, 2014, to November 15, 2014, according to a Bloomberg report. This move puts the next enrollment period after the 2014 midterm elections, potentially delaying another increase in premiums that could harm Democratic reelection prospects in the House and Senate. An unnamed official with the Department of Health and Human Services said the delay is to allow insurance companies to assess rates following the first year of the government-run marketplaces, and allow consumers more time to learn about their options. W. Va. Rejects Extending Canceled Health-Insurance Policies Keystone Good News for Living Good News The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania yesterday issued a preliminary injunction keeping the dioceses of Pittsburgh and Erie, and social-service organizations including Catholic Charities from having to comply with the Department of Health and Human Services abortion-drug, contraception, female-sterilization mandate. This is the first preliminary injunction granted to religious non-profits under HHS’s final rule. {snip} The Obama administration’s “accommodation” for religious liberty is no such thing and forces choices between conscience and service that are simply not American. Thankfully, another court has seen this, for now. A small step toward the protection of religious liberty in America. . . It won't matter if the benefit election period is ten days past the government election. These !@#$tards don't realize that people get their benefit choices communicated to them about a month in advance? I know they're out of touch with the average American worker, but this is hilarious. Companies aren't going to hold off communicating what they're planning on offering their employees and then spring it like a flashing pervert would his schlong on an unsuspecting school girl once the Dems are safely back in office. What a bunch of !@#$ing azzholes if they think that one's going to work.
IDBillzFan Posted November 22, 2013 Posted November 22, 2013 now you're just clouding the issue with facts, for which there is no room in the mind of an emotionally driven partisan. Actually, Obamacare actually was supposed to be about care, but the Republicans said they'd never vote for it if it included care, so Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi took care out of the bill and made it just about insurance, and that got them the GOP votes they needed to pass the bill. True story.
Recommended Posts