Chef Jim Posted September 15, 2013 Author Share Posted September 15, 2013 Here in Henrico(Richmond) it is .87 per $100. Had dinner with friends the other night in NYC. They bought a condo in Harlem bout 5 years ago before completely gentrified, paid $550/sq ft, going now for about $1,000/sq st. They said mid town or Chelsea now at $ 1400 sq ft.Wowser, $1.4M for a 1000 ft condo. Almost that bad here. A 1200 sq ft condo is going for $1.3M. In the same building there is one we could actually afford. It's only $650k! But it's 605 sq ft. Holy crap. That's essentially useless. For a state by state comparison of average property tax rates as a % of market value, based on 2007-2009 data, see: http://local.dexknows.com/property-tax-rates-by-state-find-out-where-you-rank/ That's kind if strange. I assume it's based on current market value kind if like current yield for bonds. It shows CA at .76% when our base is 1%. Also it doesn't say how the future taxes are assessed. Here since prop 13 it's a 1% base but they can raise it 2% a year which the unusually do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 (edited) Oh I knew what they were in NY. I was just wondering where Nanker was from. Princeton, NJ area. It's cheaper here than in Bergen County. 4-5 bedroom 2.5 baths 1/2 acre lot. The usuals. Edited September 15, 2013 by Nanker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in San Diego Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 No. How much would they be on a 200k house. I pay about 6k on a 150k house in Illinois. Basically it is 1% in California, some counties have fees they add in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICanSleepWhenI'mDead Posted September 15, 2013 Share Posted September 15, 2013 That's kind if strange. I assume it's based on current market value kind if like current yield for bonds. It shows CA at .76% when our base is 1%. Also it doesn't say how the future taxes are assessed. Here since prop 13 it's a 1% base but they can raise it 2% a year which the unusually do. Maybe this is why it seems strange: It's 1% based on current market value for new owners, but there are lots of people who bought CA homes that have seen their property taxes go up 2% per year since purchase, but their long term appreciation rate go up by far more than 2% per year. So anybody that bought a CA home before or at the early stages of the bubble now pays annual property tax at a rate of significantly less than 1% of current market value. That brings the average rate for all taxpayers (including recent buyers and people who bought long ago) down below 1%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts