The Poojer Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Tim Graham @ ByTimGraham2h Bill Belichick's Patriots are 13-4 against rookie quarterbacks http:// bit.ly/14n3Po4 Expand Jake @ jb209090782h @ ByTimGraham anyone who knows anything about statistics knows this is an irrelevant stat Expand Tim Graham @ ByTimGraham1h Anyone who knows me knows I don't care what you think RT @ jb20909078 anyone who knows anything about statistics knows this is irrelevant.
Malazan Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 timmah strikes again. why do you keep giving him and his ilk attention? Their JOB is to get you to give them attention.
thebandit27 Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Tim's reaction really shocks me...really... /sarcasm
NoSaint Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 why do you keep giving him and his ilk attention? Their JOB is to get you to give them attention. hey, im not the one that follows him on twitter. hes getting very few clicks from me.
biglukes Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Tim Graham getting pissy because someone dares to question him? Color me shocked...
atlbillsfan1975 Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Wow. For a reporter Tim has very thin skin. I find it funny when reporters give answers like he did. Kind of funny to watch how they respond when someone pokes at them.
Nathan Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Kind of a lame stat. Bill Belichick's patriots have a 76% winning percentage against rookie quarterbacks. (13-4) Bill Belichick's patriots have a 72% winning percentage against non-rookie quarterbacks. (138-53) 4% increase against rookies. Had his Pats lost one more game against a rookie QB and his winning % would actually be lower for rookie QBs vs non-rookie QBs.
thebandit27 Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Kind of a lame stat. Bill Belichick's patriots have a 76% winning percentage against rookie quarterbacks. (13-4) Bill Belichick's patriots have a 72% winning percentage against non-rookie quarterbacks. (138-53) 4% increase against rookies. Had his Pats lost one more game against a rookie QB and his winning % would actually be lower for rookie QBs vs non-rookie QBs. Not to mention he lost to the only two first-year starters he faced last season
biglukes Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Not to mention he lost to the only two first-year starters he faced last season A nice convenient omission by TG.
billsrcursed Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 I got a laugh out of his response. Me too. People need to learn how to have fun with this stuff.
PatsFanNH Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Not to mention he lost to the only two first-year starters he faced last season Thats wrong he bet Miami twice last yr.. both times a rookie qb..
Canadian Bills Fan Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 He's the journalism equivalent of Donte Whitner CBF
thebandit27 Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Thats wrong he bet Miami twice last yr.. both times a rookie qb.. Ah spit I knew that didn't seem right...thanks for the correction.
Doc Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Thats wrong he bet Miami twice last yr.. both times a rookie qb.. "Bet"? What was the wager? Actually the Pats were 3-1 against rookie QB's last year, losing to just the Seahawks.
rafter Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 Also, If a team is starting a rookie QB they were most likely a bad team to be begin with.
Just in Atlanta Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 In fairness, it is a relevant stat for Twitter. Only so much context in 140 characters... But yeah, what a penile response.
FLFan Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 I happened to catch him on NFL Network yesterday. His profile seems to be rising but I cannot figure out why. He had absolutely nothing remotely insightful to say. Arrogant twit.
Recommended Posts