brenty Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 It is a business. If we trade him, good for him. Hope we get some killer picks for him and we then can pick where he goes so that no one in the AFC gets him
K-9 Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) Well, I guess my first comment is that nearly $7M of their current cap allocation is being used on Byrd, so we have to consider that as well. As for what I'd do...let's see: Extend Chandler Extend Carrington Extend Dareus (assuming he plays up to his potential) Re-open negotiations with Byrd Start long-term talks with Spiller Chase a top-flight CB in free agency Sign a capable LG and swing tackle (who can also take over for Pears at RT when his contract runs out) in free agency Pursue an experienced backup QB Sign a situational pass rusher in free agency Those kinds of things. Are you suggesting the cap is a fluid dynamic relative to the very confined constructs of building and maintaining a team? Next thing you know, teams will hire people just to manage the cap. A "cap expert" if you will. GO BILLS!!! Edited September 6, 2013 by K-9
papazoid Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) Well, I guess my first comment is that nearly $7M of their current cap allocation is being used on Byrd, so we have to consider that as well. As for what I'd do...let's see: Extend Chandler Extend Carrington Extend Dareus (assuming he plays up to his potential) Re-open negotiations with Byrd Start long-term talks with Spiller Chase a top-flight CB in free agency Sign a capable LG and swing tackle (who can also take over for Pears at RT when his contract runs out) in free agency Pursue an experienced backup QB Sign a situational pass rusher in free agency Those kinds of things. Extend Chandler - MEDIOCRE HANDS, LOUSY BLOCKER Extend Carrington - MEDIOCRE EVERYTHING Extend Dareus (assuming he plays up to his potential) GETTING PUSHED AROUND ON RUNNING PLAYS Re-open negotiations with Byrd - WORTH KEEPING Start long-term talks with Spiller - NO NEED, UNDER TEAM CONTROL FOR 3 SEASONS THRU 2015 Chase a top-flight CB in free agency - AGREE Sign a capable LG and swing tackle (who can also take over for Pears at RT when his contract runs out) in free agency - SHOULD HAVE PAID LEVITRE Pursue an experienced backup QB - AGREE Sign a situational pass rusher in free agency - THINK YOUR GOING TO LIKE JERRY HUGHES Edited September 6, 2013 by papazoid
CodeMonkey Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 Start long-term talks with Spiller - NO NEED, UNDER TEAM CONTROL FOR 3 SEASONS THRU 2015 I believe it is only 1 more season after this. Spiller has the option to void the last year of his contract if he wants to. I don't see any reason for the Bills to wait.
ALF Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 Bills free safety Jairus Byrd has been limited in practice all week long as he tries to get his ailing feet back to 100 percent health. On Friday Doug Marrone painted a bleak picture for the Pro Bowl safety concerning his chances of playing in Sunday’s season opener against the Patriots. “Byrd has the foot that we’re all aware of and he’s doubtful,” said Marrone following Friday’s practice. http://www.buffalobills.com/news/article-2/Jairus-Byrd-doubtful-for-Sunday/6414836b-467f-43dc-b63d-81ddb72ef122 I guess 8 months off was not enough healing time
papazoid Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 I believe it is only 1 more season after this. Spiller has the option to void the last year of his contract if he wants to. I don't see any reason for the Bills to wait. there is no option out....he is signed thru 2015. UFA in 2016 http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/c.j.-spiller/ http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/5566/cj-spiller
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 I know I've been dogging Byrd... but for the record I would have paid Byrd what Parker was asking.....that's right, you heard me. lets assume the bills offered Top 4-5 money at $8.25 mil/year and Parker wanted $9 mil /year. are you kidding me ???? we have a stalemate over less than $1 million a year for a Pro Bowl player ????? Levitre, Wood & Byrd are the type of players you slightly overpay for. You don't seem to want to let go of the $8,25M figure and Benigni's tweet. Byrd is a FS, and if he was offered top 4-5 FS money, that's in the low $7M neighborhood. The conventional wisdom says that when a team offers $2M less than Parker's magic number, he ignores it. If the Bills were within $750K, a deal could have been done. They weren't, mostly likely because of the value the team placed on Byrd, his PF, and a new scheme, which presents enough unknowns to make the Bills wary of committing big $.
NoSaint Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) there is no option out....he is signed thru 2015. UFA in 2016 http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/buffalo-bills/c.j.-spiller/ http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/5566/cj-spiller I've seen the last year being void able a few places. The contract runs through 15, but he can opt out early -- I can't say that's fact but it would make sense that year shows up on roto and sportrac until its opted out of. A quick search didnt confirm spiller for me but suh for sure has a voidable last year and shows up the same on sportrac currently as the year hasn't been voided. Edited September 6, 2013 by NoSaint
papazoid Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 You don't seem to want to let go of the $8,25M figure and Benigni's tweet. Byrd is a FS, and if he was offered top 4-5 FS money, that's in the low $7M neighborhood. The conventional wisdom says that when a team offers $2M less than Parker's magic number, he ignores it. If the Bills were within $750K, a deal could have been done. They weren't, mostly likely because of the value the team placed on Byrd, his PF, and a new scheme, which presents enough unknowns to make the Bills wary of committing big $. Sport trac 2013 Cap hit for Safeties (includes base pay and all bonuses): #1- $10.2 - Eric Berry #2- $10.1 - Troy Polamalu #3- $ 9.2 - Antrele Rolle #4- $ 9.0 - Dashon Goldson #5- $ 8.6 - Eric Weddle #6- $ 6.9 - Jairus Byrd http://www.spotrac.com/rankings/nfl/cap-hit/safety/ I've seen the last year being void able a few places. The contract runs through 15, but he can opt out early -- I can't say that's fact but it would make sense that year shows up on roto and sportrac until its opted out of. A quick search didnt confirm spiller for me but suh for sure has a voidable last year and shows up the same on sportrac currently as the year hasn't been voided. sport trac highlights the player option year in green http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/eric-berry/ per year average of top 5 safeties #1- $9.1 - Polamalu #2- $8.3 - Berry #3- $8.25 - Goldson #4- $8.00 - weddle #5- $7.4 - Rolle average top 5 safeties $8.2
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) Sport trac 2013 Cap hit for Safeties (includes base pay and all bonuses): #1- $10.2 - Eric Berry #2- $10.1 - Troy Polamalu #3- $ 9.2 - Antrele Rolle #4- $ 9.0 - Dashon Goldson #5- $ 8.6 - Eric Weddle #6- $ 6.9 - Jairus Byrd http://www.spotrac.c...cap-hit/safety/ sport trac highlights the player option year in green http://www.spotrac.c...efs/eric-berry/ per year average of top 5 safeties #1- $9.1 - Polamalu #2- $8.3 - Berry #3- $8.25 - Goldson #4- $8.00 - weddle #5- $7.4 - Rolle average top 5 safeties $8.2 One more time, Byrd is a Free Safety, so throw out Berry's and Polamalu's numbers and you have: #1- $ 9.2 - Antrele Rolle #2- $ 9.0 - Dashon Goldson #3- $ 8.6 - Eric Weddle #4- $ 6.9 - Jairus Byrd #5- $ 6.3 - Michael Griffin Not sure what why the Cap Hit is the number you used, but it doesn't change the picture much when you take out Strong Safety. Edited September 6, 2013 by In-A-Gadda-Levitre
Mango Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 One more time, Byrd is a Free Safety, so throw out Berry's and Polamalu's numbers and you have: #1- $ 9.2 - Antrele Rolle #2- $ 9.0 - Dashon Goldson #3- $ 8.6 - Eric Weddle #4- $ 6.9 - Jairus Byrd #5- $ 6.3 - Michael Griffin Not sure what why the Cap Hit is the number you used, but it doesn't change the picture much when you take out Strong Safety. Sport trac 2013 Cap hit for Safeties (includes base pay and all bonuses): #1- $10.2 - Eric Berry #2- $10.1 - Troy Polamalu #3- $ 9.2 - Antrele Rolle #4- $ 9.0 - Dashon Goldson #5- $ 8.6 - Eric Weddle #6- $ 6.9 - Jairus Byrd http://www.spotrac.c...cap-hit/safety/ sport trac highlights the player option year in green http://www.spotrac.c...efs/eric-berry/ per year average of top 5 safeties #1- $9.1 - Polamalu #2- $8.3 - Berry #3- $8.25 - Goldson #4- $8.00 - weddle #5- $7.4 - Rolle average top 5 safeties $8.2 I thought placing the franchise tag on a FS is the same as any DB, so Byrd gets the average of the top 5 DB's? Right?
papazoid Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) I thought placing the franchise tag on a FS is the same as any DB, so Byrd gets the average of the top 5 DB's? Right? the CBA uses a rolling average of the Top 5 safeties OVER THE LAST 5 YEARS (not "just" the current year). One more time, Byrd is a Free Safety, so throw out Berry's and Polamalu's numbers and you have: #1- $ 9.2 - Antrele Rolle #2- $ 9.0 - Dashon Goldson #3- $ 8.6 - Eric Weddle #4- $ 6.9 - Jairus Byrd #5- $ 6.3 - Michael Griffin Not sure what why the Cap Hit is the number you used, but it doesn't change the picture much when you take out Strong Safety. the CBA does NOT separate out free vs strong safety. just like it doesn't separate OL Tackles from Guards. Quarterback: $14,896,000 / $13,068,000 Defensive end: $11,175,000 / $9,151,000 Cornerback: $10,854,000 / $9,095,000 Wide receiver: $10,537,000 / $8,867,000 Offensive linemen: $9,828,000 / $8,709,000 Linebacker: $9,619,000 / $8,358,000 Defensive tackle: $8,450,000 / $7,039,000 Running back: $8,219,000 / $6,970,000 Safety: $6,916,000 / $6,002,000 Tight end: $6,066,000 / $5,194,000 Kicker/punter: $2,977,000 / $2,700,000 Edited September 6, 2013 by papazoid
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 (edited) I thought placing the franchise tag on a FS is the same as any DB, so Byrd gets the average of the top 5 DB's? Right? If you're talking about the value of the Franchise Tag, yes, but just safeties, not all DBs. CBs are paid $10.854M as a non-exclusive tag. the CBA does NOT separate out free vs strong safety. just like it doesn't separate OL Tackles from Guards. This is about your figure of $8.25M as what the Bills offered, because you're using all safeties as the base, not the CBA calculation of the Franchise Tag. IMO, this is not true. It's like saying a RT is worth what a LT makes. Edited September 6, 2013 by In-A-Gadda-Levitre
papazoid Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 If you're talking about the value of the Franchise Tag, yes, but just safeties, not all DBs. CBs are paid $10.854M as a non-exclusive tag. This is about your figure of $8.25M as what the Bills offered, because you're using all safeties as the base, not the CBA calculation of the Franchise Tag. IMO, this is not true. It's like saying a RT is worth what a LT makes. the current franchise tag value for ALL safeties, irregardless if free or strong is $6.9 million. that $6.9 is the average of the top 5 safeties over the last 5 years. NOT THE CURRENT YEAR. cornerbacks have their own category. $8.25 million is what you get if you take the average yearly salary of the current contracts of the Top 5 highest paid safeties in the NFL. some of these guys have 5 year deals some have 6 year deals. some are in their last year, some in their third year of their current deal.
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 $8.25 million is what you get if you take the average yearly salary of the current contracts of the Top 5 highest paid safeties in the NFL. So Benigni's tweet is wrong, they offered Top 3 safety money? Top 4-5 is $7.4M - $8M
K-9 Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 Eugene Parker is NOT making the distinction between "free" and "strong" safety when he negotiates. He's using Polamalu and Berry's numbers in there as well so I don't know why we would make the distinction, either. It's all about guaranteed money and actual salaries paid. The average doesn't mean a thing except to agents, so I find the use of them in the discussion to be irrelevant. In terms of guaranteed money, Berry dwarfs everybody else at $25.6m. If Byrd wanted that kind of money, he should have been a top 5 draft pick. As it is, if we tag him again next year, he'd be at $15.2m guaranteed, which is still short of Weddle and Goldson's $19m and $18m, respectively. In terms of actual salary, Byrd is at 6.9 guaranteed this year which places him 4th in the league. I'm not sure why the "cap hit" rankings would be included accept to try to make a point that Byrd is somehow not in the top 5? GO BILLS!!!
FLFan Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 This is off the current discussion thread a little, so sorry about that, but I find it interesting that the Toronto Sun has a story quoting Byrd as squelching the trade desire rumors, while the Buffalo media braintrust has nothing to say about that. Just interesting is all. Carry on.
In-A-Gadda-Levitre Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 Eugene Parker is NOT making the distinction between "free" and "strong" safety when he negotiates. He's using Polamalu and Berry's numbers in there as well so I don't know why we would make the distinction, either. It's all about guaranteed money and actual salaries paid. The average doesn't mean a thing except to agents, so I find the use of them in the discussion to be irrelevant. In terms of guaranteed money, Berry dwarfs everybody else at $25.6m. If Byrd wanted that kind of money, he should have been a top 5 draft pick. As it is, if we tag him again next year, he'd be at $15.2m guaranteed, which is still short of Weddle and Goldson's $19m and $18m, respectively. In terms of actual salary, Byrd is at 6.9 guaranteed this year which places him 4th in the league. I'm not sure why the "cap hit" rankings would be included accept to try to make a point that Byrd is somehow not in the top 5? GO BILLS!!! I don't disagree. What I think happened is that Parker says $9M (top of all safeties), the Bills say $7M (top 4-5 FSs), Parker ignores it, the Bills leak hey, we offered top 4-5, and it goes nowhere. As far as Berry's deal goes, remember he was 5th overall in the last class before the new CBA went into play...
papazoid Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 This is off the current discussion thread a little, so sorry about that, but I find it interesting that the Toronto Sun has a story quoting Byrd as squelching the trade desire rumors, while the Buffalo media braintrust has nothing to say about that. Just interesting is all. Carry on. Byrd did NOT talk to the Toronto sun. that reporter is just rehashing the EXACT same thing the buffalo news said. http://www.torontosun.com/2013/09/05/bills-jarius-byrd-silences-trade-talk-rumours
K-9 Posted September 6, 2013 Posted September 6, 2013 I don't disagree. What I think happened is that Parker says $9M (top of all safeties), the Bills say $7M (top 4-5 FSs), Parker ignores it, the Bills leak hey, we offered top 4-5, and it goes nowhere. As far as Berry's deal goes, remember he was 5th overall in the last class before the new CBA went into play... That's why I mentioned it. Berry's guaranteed dollars really skew the numbers because of his status as a high pick before the rookie wage scale went into effect. But I can see Parker arguing for that kind of money. GO BILLS!!!
Recommended Posts