Fixxxer Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 I like the message it sends to the rookie QBs, kids, if you're in trouble look my way.
DanInUticaTampa Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 What caught my attention was when he said "there are guys in the receivers room that are as good or better than me." Thought that was a good team first comment and a nice compliment for his teammates. For a guy who has been our number one receiver, it seems it wouldn't bother him if one of these young guys eclipse him. Love that part. And good thing for him to call out pats* secondary. They will focus more attention to shut him down and that will open up things for others. People who hate on Stevie are blaming the Bills problems on the wrong people. Stevie is part of the solution to our playoff drought, not part of the problem
The Wiz Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 What caught my attention was when he said "there are guys in the receivers room that are as good or better than me." Thought that was a good team first comment and a nice compliment for his teammates. For a guy who has been our number one receiver, it seems it wouldn't bother him if one of these young guys eclipse him. Love that part. And good thing for him to call out pats* secondary. They will focus more attention to shut him down and that will open up things for others. People who hate on Stevie are blaming the Bills problems on the wrong people. Stevie is part of the solution to our playoff drought, not part of the problem Agree on all parts Dan. He know's he's not the faster player out there or even the best (in some cases) but he's really a breathe of fresh air. I don't care if he runs his mouth if his play backs it up and thus far, he's been doing a good job of doing that.
FLFan Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 I am sure the pats receivers are feeling pretty good against leodis mckelvin and co. The current Pats receivers are lucky to be playing in the NFL. If anyone other than Brady were the QB, you could could completely ignore the Patriots passing game at this point.
C.Biscuit97 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 OMG!!!! Cut him now!!! Now, professional players are going to be motivated more!!! Stevie is right. He gets open every play. And guess what? The PAts are going to double team him and force the other wrs to beat them. If SJ was on the Pats, he'd be putting up top 5 numbers.
Coach Tuesday Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 OMG!!!! Cut him now!!! Now, professional players are going to be motivated more!!! Stevie is right. He gets open every play. And guess what? The PAts are going to double team him and force the other wrs to beat them. If SJ was on the Pats, he'd be putting up top 5 numbers. If Stevie was on the Pats, he would not be mouthing off, because there would be serious consequences.
C.Biscuit97 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 If Stevie was on the Pats, he would not be mouthing off, because there would be serious consequences. They had a player who was Tony Montana and only were forced to cut him after he finally got popped. This high & mighty Pats organization is the biggest joke in sports. They are built off a lucky 6th round pick.
Coach Tuesday Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 They had a player who was Tony Montana and only were forced to cut him after he finally got popped. This high & mighty Pats organization is the biggest joke in sports. They are built off a lucky 6th round pick. You're totally delusional, but you seem happy. Sorta.
OCinBuffalo Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Joe Buscaglia @JoeBuscaglia8m To be clear on the Chung thing. Stevie said him because he's been reviewing last year's tape. I told him Chung moved after. Just didn't know Stevie watching tape is all I care about. Would you rather he was designing a new t-shirt? The current Pats receivers are lucky to be playing in the NFL. If anyone other than Brady were the QB, you could could completely ignore the Patriots passing game at this point. Not 100% accurate. I've watched all their games. It is true that they have serious ?, and, I'm pretty sure about what they are going to try to do with Amendola. It probably has about 30-40% chance of working, and that's because of Brady, not Amendola. This is also due to the fact that they simply do not have the threat at TE that they are used to having. We'll see, but, even when Gronk returns, it might shock a few people when he doesn't get the stats we're used to seeing. However, they have a new WR who can play. He's not Randy Moss, and I'm not saying he will be. However, you might want to consider Kenbrell Thompkins for your fantasy team, perhaps as your last reserve, because, come on, is that guy you have really gonna do anything? I believe that many will know exactly who he is by mid-season. Again, not saying he's good. Am saying: he has a prolific passer throwing to him, and there's a very good chance of him being targeted a whole lot.
C.Biscuit97 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 You're totally delusional, but you seem happy. Sorta. Obviously, you have no counter. See the Pats franchise (and Belichick) before and after Brady. They were a joke.
Coach Tuesday Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Obviously, you have no counter. See the Pats franchise (and Belichick) before and after Brady. They were a joke. You're right, I have no counter. The Patriots are a joke of an organization who got lucky with one late-round draft pick and have done nothing else to achieve success. An idiot with a winning lottery ticket. You got me. You obviously know what you're talking about, I'll back off.
C.Biscuit97 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 You're right, I have no counter. The Patriots are a joke of an organization who got lucky with one late-round draft pick and have done nothing else to achieve success. An idiot with a winning lottery ticket. You got me. You obviously know what you're talking about, I'll back off. Thanks. And yes, it's really that simple. Get a HOF QB & instantly you become a contender. See the Colts without Manning. See the Packers with Rogers & Farve. See how the Skins go from 3-13 to NFC east champs with RG3 (and Shanahan becomes a genius again like he was with Elway). And guess what happens if EJ becomes a franchise guy? Marrone & Whaley are geniuses and we have a playoff contender every year.
Coach Tuesday Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Thanks. And yes, it's really that simple. Get a HOF QB & instantly you become a contender. See the Colts without Manning. See the Packers with Rogers & Farve. See how the Skins go from 3-13 to NFC east champs with RG3 (and Shanahan becomes a genius again like he was with Elway). And guess what happens if EJ becomes a franchise guy? Marrone & Whaley are geniuses and we have a playoff contender every year. Thank you for simplifying it for us. I now understand futbahl.
C.Biscuit97 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Thank you for simplifying it for us. I now understand futbahl. You're welcome. Easier than just Bill Belichick & Bob Kraft are geniuses. But in all seriousness, besides the Qbs, who's roster would you rather have: Bills or Pats?
Coach Tuesday Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 (edited) You're welcome. Easier than just Bill Belichick & Bob Kraft are geniuses. But in all seriousness, besides the Qbs, who's roster would you rather have: Bills or Pats? Easily, the Pats. They have real offensive linemen, real linebackers, one of the best nosetackles in football (who actually shows up every week and plays with toughness, unlike our first-round nosetackle), the best tight end in football when healthy, two great young passrushers, and, perhaps most importantly, the best coach in football. You know, the one who managed to beat us twice without Brady, which would seem impossible according to your logic. Edited September 2, 2013 by Coach Tuesday
DanInUticaTampa Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Easily, the Pats. They have real offensive linemen, real linebackers, one of the best nosetackles in football (who actually shows up every week and plays with toughness, unlike our first-round nosetackle), the best tight end in football when healthy, two great young passrushers, and, perhaps most importantly, the best coach in football. You know, the one who managed to beat us twice without Brady, which would seem impossible according to your logic. You forgot their run game which is pretty good now
C.Biscuit97 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Easily, the Pats. They have real offensive linemen, real linebackers, one of the best nosetackles in football (who actually shows up every week and plays with toughness, unlike our first-round nosetackle), the best tight end in football when healthy, two great young passrushers, and, perhaps most importantly, the best coach in football. You know, the one who managed to beat us twice without Brady, which would seem impossible according to your logic. Well, I disagree and I do think they are a lot closer than you want to give the bills credit for. And Matt Cassell, who took over a 16-0 team & also took the Chiefs to the playoffs, is a much, much better QB than Edwards and Losman. You forgot their run game which is pretty good now It is solid but you can argue that it is all because of Brady. Imagine Spiller with Brady? Our qb last year couldn't throw past 10 yards. You can't stack the box with Brady. Look, as long as the Pats have Brady, they are always the favorites. But it just goes to show how much a difference a QB makes. The second Brady goes out, they are a very ordinary team.
#34fan Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 There's no doubt in my mind that the Pats CANNOT stop Marcus Easley. Tuel to Easley = MONEY. TJ Graham can't catch. Period. I still can't forget the Pittsburgh drop. Sorry Stevie.
Pirate Angel Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 If he would back it up it would be great
Recommended Posts