boyst Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 I highly suspect that when sitting in the schedule design meetings that the bills just get slid into holes in more prominent schedules simply because we aren't a reliable TV draw. I doubt that schedule makers are actively making ours harder as much as simply not caring much about it I would agree with this more then I would agree that it is done against us. However, isn't that itself against us? That teams are not scheduled fairly? I once made an NFL schedule, all the teams, it was hard. I made every team have at least one night game, too. No back to back west-coast trips, either. It was hard but not impossible. I was like 22.
Enemarty Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 (edited) Can you give any reason the nfl would want to do this? To give the pats a double bye week? Or is it more in the out to get us category? agreed. if the pats were really interested in gaining an advantage in gaming the schedule, there are about 20 other teams they would prefer to face coming off a bye week than the one team they have owned during the last 20 years. having two weeks to prepare for the ravens, steelers, broncos or whatever flavor of the season would be more beneficial than having two weeks to game plan for DJ or the chan. Edited September 4, 2013 by Enemarty
Doc Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 agreed. if the pats were really interested in gaining an advantage in gaming the schedule, there are about 20 other teams they would prefer to face coming off a bye week than the one team they have owned during the last 20 years. having two weeks to prepare for the ravens, steelers, broncos or whatever flavor of the season would be more beneficial than having two weeks to game plan for DJ or the chan. Yet it keeps happening against the Bills. Can you name any other team that has played even more than 2 times against the same team coming off a bye in a 10 year span, much less 5?
RuntheDamnBall Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Yet it keeps happening against the Bills. Can you name any other team that has played even more than 2 times against the same team coming off a bye in a 10 year span, much less 5? If the Bills were good or simply respectable and were losing this one game consistently, I think you could look at it as more of an issue. They've also seemed to start and finish the season against the Pats more frequently, which is a weird scheduling quirk too.
Doc Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 If the Bills were good or simply respectable and were losing this one game consistently, I think you could look at it as more of an issue. They've also seemed to start and finish the season against the Pats more frequently, which is a weird scheduling quirk too. I agree with you that the Pats don't need the extra time (although several games have been close losses), but yet it still happens more than by pure chance or a "scheduling quirk."
Enemarty Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Yet it keeps happening against the Bills. Can you name any other team that has played even more than 2 times against the same team coming off a bye in a 10 year span, much less 5? Yes it does and it's damn frustrating. However, I can't agree that it is some secret plan of NE. As No Saint suggests, it's far more likely that the NFL schedule geeks find it convenient to drop us into that slot and it's also more likely that they are thick enough not to realize they keep doing it every year, than it would be to think NE is devious enough to arrange to play us after every bye, and stupid enough to do it so often that it's such an obvious outlier that questions would be raised.
Doc Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Yes it does and it's damn frustrating. However, I can't agree that it is some secret plan of NE. As No Saint suggests, it's far more likely that the NFL schedule geeks find it convenient to drop us into that slot and it's also more likely that they are thick enough not to realize they keep doing it every year, than it would be to think NE is devious enough to arrange to play us after every bye, and stupid enough to do it so often that it's such an obvious outlier that questions would be raised. I don't know whose secret plan it is. I can't believe the NFL would do it on their own and the Bills certainly wouldn't ask for it, so it must come from the Patriots. One time is expected. Twice is possibly chance. Three times or more is a trend.
Rico Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 I, for one, would like to see the Pats sign more ex-Bill scrubs.... let them fill their roster with bums please.
Nanker Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 (edited) I don't know whose secret plan it is. I can't believe the NFL would do it on their own and the Bills certainly wouldn't ask for it, so it must come from the Patriots. One time is expected. Twice is possibly chance. Three times or more is a trend. The League could put an end to this happy horseshit by mandating that every team in a Division gets the same bye-week. Then Division's teams would play each other (on a rotating basis year-after year) on the week following their bye-week. For example, AFCE teams all have a bye on Week 9. Week 10 JESTS play Pats* and Miami plays Bills. Following year - the games would be Pats* play Miami, JESTS play Bills, and so forth and so on. It ain't brain science in spite of what the NFL Schedulers want you to believe when they're on the NFL Network flap-jawing about the impossible task they had to perform. Edited September 4, 2013 by Nanker
xsoldier54 Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 It's just Belichick playing head games. If the defense executes Pettine's scheme, it will give Brady fits, regardless of who is on NE's roster. White will not help them. it's just a mind game.
plenzmd1 Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 I am pretty sure the Pats* had cuts as well, and the Bills have all the ability in the world to sign one of them. Lets not forget White has been gone for two weeks, not two days like most final cuts.
Nanker Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Anyone in their corner of the world calling out BB for "Dumpster Diving"? Just curious.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 If the Pats have been so successful signing other team's scraps to learn opponents playbooks.. The Bills should sign TIM TEBOW!!!! Counter this move by signing Tebow...LMAO I know you guys are kidding but miraculously the following fact (below) never came up in the most recent "sign Tebow" thread. Besides the media circus which accompanies him and the fact of his inaccurate throwing, the biggest reason Tebow has been deemed useless by NFL teams is because he is dyslexic. You can't be an NFL quarterback if you can't fully comprehend the playbook. For the same reason, it would likely be useless to use Tebow to gain any insight into the New England playbook. http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=tebow+dyslexic&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 As for White, he's an excellent special teamer, especially in kick coverage. He was also considered a "coach on the field" and the Bills scouts raved about his ability to immediately diagnose plays in the media play following the draft. He actually fits the profile of a Belichick player. Not sure if this means he'll stick around for very long in New England but he might.
Jerry Christ Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 (edited) I am pretty sure the Pats* had cuts as well, and the Bills have all the ability in the world to sign one of them. Lets not forget White has been gone for two weeks, not two days like most final cuts. he could be pissed for being traded/cut from us? hahahah Edited September 4, 2013 by Jerry Christ
PromoTheRobot Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Not at all...since their personnel dept. is so much smarter than ours... Cutting contributing players to make room for guys you're just going to cut in a week is smart football.
drnykterstein Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 typical. what else should we expect? that's how it goes when you get a guy who has no problems cheating.. I agree this seems like something Belechick would do. Pick up a player from his week one opponent to learn their scheme without having to rely on preseason film. But has he done this often before? I remember Fast Freddy Smith he also claimed off waivers when we played them week one. Are there other examples of this that anyone can name?
Drop Kick Flutie Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 I don't know whose secret plan it is. I can't believe the NFL would do it on their own and the Bills certainly wouldn't ask for it, so it must come from the Patriots. One time is expected. Twice is possibly chance. Three times or more is a trend. If I'm the Pats and I can make the schedule how I want, why would I waste my bye week on the Bills? I'd rather use it on a team that would be harder to beat like the Broncos.
Doc Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 If I'm the Pats and I can make the schedule how I want, why would I waste my bye week on the Bills? I'd rather use it on a team that would be harder to beat like the Broncos. As I said above, you would think. Yet it's happened numerous times (at least 5) the past decade to the Bills and that's not coincidence.
Sisyphean Bills Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 The League could put an end to this happy horseshit by mandating that every team in a Division gets the same bye-week. The formula used to be based on a team's record. My conjecture is that the present formula has something to do with TV market coverage.
Saint Doug Posted September 5, 2013 Posted September 5, 2013 I wonder if Bellicheat has a special interrogation room in their stadium. A dark room with a single wooden chair and a bright overhead light.
Recommended Posts