Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Disagree that Easley gets cut, I don't see all the love for Hogan slow white guy and Brad Smith costs to much for the production you get.

Edited by bisonbrigade
Posted (edited)

The media from Sal Capaccio to guys inside the organization like Chris Brown & John Murphy seem to be way too gung-ho when it comes to Hogan. Easley earned the #5 role.

Edited by BigCountryBills
Posted

Disagree that Easley gets cut, I don't see all the love for Hogan slow white guy and Brad Smith costs to much for the production you get.

 

I disagree with the Easley cut as well. I don't think we should keep Brad Smith at this point...

Posted

I can't see them keeping brad smith. If his injury will keep him out for a few weeks, it will make even less sense to keep him. We already have Gilmore and Kolb that are injured and count against the roster, and possibly EJ and byrd. And somepoint, you can't have that many players that are injured counting against the roster. Someone has to go to IR eventually. I am not even sure if PUP is even an option at this point.

Posted

I think Easley has more than earned it...I was ready to cut bait with him...but he has been reliable...don't envy this part of the coaching job....

Posted

Disagree that Easley gets cut, I don't see all the love for Hogan slow white guy and Brad Smith costs to much for the production you get.

By "slow white guy". I'm guessing you just mean "white guy" as Hogan ran a 4.39 40. Glad you're not the GM or anybody with decision making powers.

Posted

Disagree that Easley gets cut, I don't see all the love for Hogan slow white guy and Brad Smith costs to much for the production you get.

 

Who gets open and doesn't drop balls...

 

This is what he brings to the table, is it better than what Easley provides? Tough question, but a good problem to have IMO.

Posted

 

By "slow white guy". I'm guessing you just mean "white guy" as Hogan ran a 4.39 40. Glad you're not the GM or anybody with decision making powers.

Ha, racial stereotyping.

 

PTR

Posted

just ask yourself....who, if he was cut, would you worry about getting signed by someone else and scoring against us? Easley or Smith? I say Easley. I personally think Brad Smith has been a waste of a roster spot since he got here.

Posted

just ask yourself....who, if he was cut, would you worry about getting signed by someone else and scoring against us? Easley or Smith? I say Easley. I personally think Brad Smith has been a waste of a roster spot since he got here.

You mean the two passes he made last year that were both picked off was a bad thing?

Posted

Easley had a drop or two last night, but on that one TD pass from Lewis he hit a top speed that I didn't know he had. He pulled away from that DB and took it to the house.

 

I trust they'll make the best decision moving forward, but i'm sure rooting for the kid. Given how raw he was coming out of UConn, he's come a long way.

Posted

I can see why Smith would stick with concerns at multiple positions. But Easley and Hogan have looked better as WRs.

 

I kind of wish we'd drop the Fullback and keep Dickerson, as well. But I'm not sure if that fits our scheme.

Posted

I think its a reasonable roster. The only possible differences is the WR position. I think Easly played so much in preseason is to see if he could stay healthy, and he did. So I think he has a shot.

Posted

just ask yourself....who, if he was cut, would you worry about getting signed by someone else and scoring against us? Easley or Smith? I say Easley. I personally think Brad Smith has been a waste of a roster spot since he got here.

 

 

yup, Pats will sign Easley and he will be kicking our ass

×
×
  • Create New...