K-9 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Byrd should have been a DT instead, then. GO BILLS!!!
Nanker Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Byrd is reaping what Parker sewed. Parker had him hold out for THE top contract and it blew up on them because the team called them. Now, the only way they can get more money for his previous (underpaid) time is to take this year's guaranteed money and not play a game, or play very little. This seems to me to be the Peters' pouting positioning Parker pronouncedly played previously to such great effect that it got a trade done. This, in my view is what Parker is making happen again. Won't accept our "fair" offer - okay then, here's your damaged goods player. He ain't gonna play for you worth a damn this year or next. So go ahead and give him $14million guaranteed - but he still ain't gonna play for you. You'd better just trade him to someone who will give him what I demand. Anyone else think Byrd and Parker have a ton of balls to demand THE TOP contract for a Safety - when they knew he has a gimpy foot?
K-9 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Byrd is reaping what Parker sewed. Parker had him hold out for THE top contract and it blew up on them because the team called them. Now, the only way they can get more money for his previous (underpaid) time is to take this year's guaranteed money and not play a game, or play very little. This seems to me to be the Peters' pouting positioning Parker pronouncedly played previously to such great effect that it got a trade done. This, in my view is what Parker is making happen again. Won't accept our "fair" offer - okay then, here's your damaged goods player. He ain't gonna play for you worth a damn this year or next. So go ahead and give him $14million guaranteed - but he still ain't gonna play for you. You'd better just trade him to someone who will give him what I demand. Anyone else think Byrd and Parker have a ton of balls to demand THE TOP contract for a Safety - when they knew he has a gimpy foot? Holy alliteration Batman! Irv Weinstein would be proud. GO BILLS!!!
papazoid Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Byrd is reaping what Parker sewed. Parker had him hold out for THE top contract and it blew up on them because the team called them. Now, the only way they can get more money for his previous (underpaid) time is to take this year's guaranteed money and not play a game, or play very little. This seems to me to be the Peters' pouting positioning Parker pronouncedly played previously to such great effect that it got a trade done. This, in my view is what Parker is making happen again. Won't accept our "fair" offer - okay then, here's your damaged goods player. He ain't gonna play for you worth a damn this year or next. So go ahead and give him $14million guaranteed - but he still ain't gonna play for you. You'd better just trade him to someone who will give him what I demand. Anyone else think Byrd and Parker have a ton of balls to demand THE TOP contract for a Safety - when they knew he has a gimpy foot? this scenario has NOT happened yet... but it is a real possibility.... say this ten times fast "Peters' pouting positioning Parker pronouncedly played previously"....lol
kasper13 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Have a feeling that if J Byrd were traded today and he got his big fat new contract that his foot would heal very,very quickly and he would be 100% by Sunday.
papazoid Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 2 hours ago.... ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. -- Jairus Byrd's availability for the Buffalo Bills' season opener against the New England Patriots is uncertain, coach Doug Marrone said Sunday, due to a foot injury the safety revealed is plantar fasciitis. http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9626656/top-buffalo-bills-safety-jairus-byrd-battling-plantar-fasciitis
bigK14094 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Hmmmmm, now I see why there was no deal. If this impacts his year substantially, he will come cheaper next year. Whatley may be on top of this one after all.
papazoid Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Doug Whaley asked the NFL to extend Byrd's exemption thru week 1, maybe he knew something ? The Bills approached the NFL for an exemption a day after Byrd signed his one-year, $6.9 million franchise tender. General manager Doug Whaley told The Associated Press he had not ruled out having the exemption extend into the regular season. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/bills-seek-roster-exemption-nfl-s-byrd
billsfan1959 Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Holy alliteration Batman! Irv Weinstein would be proud. GO BILLS!!! Well done sir
26CornerBlitz Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Jairus Byrd's injury sounds like season-long headache for player, team
Dorkington Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Jairus Byrd's injury sounds like season-long headache for player, team As soon as they said it's plantar fasciitis, we all knew it was going to be an issue. It's one of those things people can play on at a certain level with treatment, but if it gets aggravated, it could shut him down completely. The only real solution is resting him until it's healed, but who knows how long that could take.
CountryCletus Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 I would expect his foot to be completely healed in about 18 1/2 weeks from now...
papazoid Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 how did that crack bills medical staff pass his physical ? he should be good by the BYE week
peterlaw Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 A potential career threatening injury? Byrd was never blessed with great speed even with two good feet. No one will be paying him top NFL Safety money now. Thank God the Bills FO did not invest millions. Pleased we have invested in Eric Wood who has recovered from horrific injuries with great character.
NoSaint Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 how did that crack bills medical staff pass his physical ? he should be good by the BYE week well, its possible it didnt show up. its also possible he didnt truly show 100% health but was an injury risk they were willing to accept in the signing. when the alternative to signing him was releasing him, id rather hold his rights at this point, wouldnt you?
FLFan Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 well, its possible it didnt show up. its also possible he didnt truly show 100% health but was an injury risk they were willing to accept in the signing. when the alternative to signing him was releasing him, id rather hold his rights at this point, wouldnt you? It is my understanding that this problem can only be diagnosed via the symptoms reported. That is why this is an awfully convenient injury to have if your intent is not to play. I guess we will see, but I tend to think it will be fine by the end of December.
26CornerBlitz Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Just heard on NFL Network that Byrd dealt with the same issue last season and took needles a couple of times just to make it through the season.
Bangarang Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Per Ian Rappaport: Byrd to possibly miss some time.
NoSaint Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Just heard on NFL Network that Byrd dealt with the same issue last season and took needles a couple of times just to make it through the season. And still played pretty darn well. Hopefully will be the case again. Per Ian Rappaport: Byrd to possibly miss some time. Has there been anyone with more vague and useless tweets about Byrd this last week? Byrd possibly upset Byrd possibly to miss time
26CornerBlitz Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Jairus Byrd injury: plantar fasciitis dates back to 2012 season: http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2013/9/3/4691824/jairus-byrd-injury-plantar-fasciitis-dates-back-to-2012-season
Recommended Posts