San-O Posted January 14, 2005 Posted January 14, 2005 I listened to the game on the internet, and followed those stats. Going back, I know Bledsoe had a terrible game, but how does the rest of the team seemingly not shows up? What was the atmosphere? We had seen Bledsoe collapse before, and the rest of the team was able to compensate. This is particularly more confusing as we were up against backups for the most part when the game was still in question. Are Pittsburgh and New England really THAT good, or are the Bills really that far away?
T-Bone Posted January 14, 2005 Posted January 14, 2005 New England is really that good...jury is still out on the Steelers
sfladave Posted January 14, 2005 Posted January 14, 2005 Plain and simple explanation...Our offense was outcoached and outplayed. Our defense was outplayed.
San-O Posted January 14, 2005 Author Posted January 14, 2005 Plain and simple explanation...Our offense was outcoached and outplayed. Our defense was outplayed. 205560[/snapback] One would have thougth that MM having been one year removed from coaching that offense would have given the Bills an advantage? Guess not.
Dan Gross Posted January 14, 2005 Posted January 14, 2005 One would have thougth that MM having been one year removed from coachingthat offense would have given the Bills an advantage? Guess not. 205576[/snapback] But the Steelers were one year removed from having him as their offensive coach. And Lebeau was one year removed from the Bills defense. When all is said and done, experience usually wins out in the "knowing each other" battle.
Recommended Posts