B-Man Posted October 29, 2013 Share Posted October 29, 2013 The Sgt. Schultz MediaBy Peter Kirsavow Outrage spans the land as the mainstream media breathlessly report that administration officials knew for more than three years Obama’s ironclad promise, “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it. Period.” was howlingly false and millions would lose the coverage they liked. The bulletin is issued as if no one other than certain government officials knew that the president’s promise, regularly invoked in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election, was A Bright Shining Lie. Nonsense. Tens of thousands of us who had actually read the hideously titled Affordable Care Act — or significant portions thereof — because we had to organize our businesses around it, advise clients regarding compliance with it, or otherwise implement the monstrosity’s provisions, knew health-care coverage for millions was going to be adversely affected. Millions more simply understood that there’s no such thing as a free lunch. The mainstream media, however, was too busy lambasting tea-party evildoers, Ted Cruz, House Republicans, and conservatives generally to bother reading the Act. In fairness, it’s a bit difficult to read interminably long legislation when you’re busy performing your day job as the administration’s stenographer. Or maybe they thought Nancy Pelosi meant that by sheer osmosis, if we passed the bill, we’d automatically know what’s in it. The mainstream media can be counted on to bring up the rear on any stories reflecting poorly on this administration. On Obamacare, they’re a mere three and a half years late. On Benghazi, they’re just now discovering it’s a real scandal. These things might’ve been news if reported when sentient beings became aware of them, or at least before the 2012 election. Now, it’s just CYA noise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 (edited) Edited October 30, 2013 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Truman: The Buck Stops Here Obama: The Buck Stops Somewhere Else and I'll Give Speeches Telling You Where Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 HOWIE CARR: “First he ruins the health care system. Now he wants to come in and wreck the World Series. . . . Yesterday, the White House was dithering back and forth over whether to go to Game 6 tonight. They haven’t been this confused since they were trying to decide whether to bomb Syria.” . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 HOWIE CARR: “First he ruins the health care system. Now he wants to come in and wreck the World Series. . . . Yesterday, the White House was dithering back and forth over whether to go to Game 6 tonight. They haven’t been this confused since they were trying to decide whether to bomb Syria.” Important stuff. After Obama makes this crucial executive decision, I wonder if he will pivot and tackle our national nightmare of twerking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 Important stuff. After Obama makes this crucial executive decision, I wonder if he will pivot and tackle our national nightmare of twerking That sounds like an assignment for Bill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 30, 2013 Share Posted October 30, 2013 (edited) Jack Lail: White House photo access controls public image. “The Associated Press, the largest U.S. Wire service, has only been allowed to photograph Obama in his office on two occasions, according to Associated Press Director of Photography Santiago Lyon. Lyon said the administration’s control of photo access and use of official photos amounts to propaganda. He said no official explanation of the lack of access has been given and that greater access was common under previous presidential administrations.” I’ve got an explanation. I’ll bet you can think of one on your own, though. The Whatever Presidency http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srufFKrnku0 Edited October 30, 2013 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 Jack Lail: White House photo access controls public image. “The Associated Press, the largest U.S. Wire service, has only been allowed to photograph Obama in his office on two occasions, according to Associated Press Director of Photography Santiago Lyon. Lyon said the administration’s control of photo access and use of official photos amounts to propaganda. He said no official explanation of the lack of access has been given and that greater access was common under previous presidential administrations.” Obama runs the most transparent administration in history. That's a bona fide certified guaranteed indisputable fact. Just ask them*. *You may only ask that simple question; you may not engage the administration in any other line of inquiry. You will look where they tell you to look and above all else you are to not EVER peek behind the curtain without permission - which, as previously mentioned, you are not permitted to ask for. FORWARD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 Jindal: In New Court Filing, DOJ Admits Incompetence In August, the Obama administration sued Louisiana over its school-voucher program, which was designed to help minority children get out of their failing schools, claiming that the program impeded the “desegregation process.” However, it seems that Eric Holder and the Justice Department can’t produce the documents at the center of their lawsuit. The DOJ filed a new court motion Tuesday in which they requested extra time to respond to the court’s request for documents, including the desegregation orders fundamental to the Obama administration’s lawsuit. The DOJ reportedly needs time to request the documents from archives and evaluate them, prompting one to ask how the DOJ could have filed the lawsuit without looking at the necessary documents in the first place. Governor Jindal responded to news of this request for delay: The Obama Administration’s lawsuit against Louisiana’s scholarship program is a case study on incompetence. The administration’s latest gaffe is an admission that it sued the state based on documents the Department of Justice is not able to readily produce. To reiterate, the Department of Justice does not even have the very documents that are allegedly the foundation of its lawsuit. This is the latest example of incompetence from the Obama Administration. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 2, 2013 Share Posted November 2, 2013 IT’S COME TO THIS: Jimmy Carter Slams Obama’s Ineptitude. “It may be that Jimmy Carter has a right to sit in judgment of Barack Obama. Which is among the worst things that could be said about America’s 44th president.” IT’S COME TO THIS: ABC News: How Obama Measures Up Against Other TV Pitchmen. Plus a clip reel comparing him to his ShamWow-style competition. But then, as Rand Simberg famously observed a while back, Obama is all sham, no wow. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted November 2, 2013 Share Posted November 2, 2013 Jindal: In New Court Filing, DOJ Admits Incompetence In August, the Obama administration sued Louisiana over its school-voucher program, which was designed to help minority children get out of their failing schools, claiming that the program impeded the “desegregation process.” However, it seems that Eric Holder and the Justice Department can’t produce the documents at the center of their lawsuit. The DOJ filed a new court motion Tuesday in which they requested extra time to respond to the court’s request for documents, including the desegregation orders fundamental to the Obama administration’s lawsuit. The DOJ reportedly needs time to request the documents from archives and evaluate them, prompting one to ask how the DOJ could have filed the lawsuit without looking at the necessary documents in the first place. Governor Jindal responded to news of this request for delay: The Obama Administration’s lawsuit against Louisiana’s scholarship program is a case study on incompetence. The administration’s latest gaffe is an admission that it sued the state based on documents the Department of Justice is not able to readily produce. To reiterate, the Department of Justice does not even have the very documents that are allegedly the foundation of its lawsuit. This is the latest example of incompetence from the Obama Administration. . Good for jindal and Louisiana to say it like it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 2, 2013 Share Posted November 2, 2013 IT’S COME TO THIS: Jimmy Carter Slams Obama’s Ineptitude. "He’s done the best he could under the circumstances. His major accomplishment was Obamacare, and the implementation of it now is questionable at best." I don't know if that's really a scathing indictment. It looks like "Mr. Malaise" is simply setting Obama up to blame others. "Under the circumstances" meaning the "mess" Bush left him that he is still apparently "cleaning up" 5 years into his presidency. I'm equally sure that Mr. Carter means that the implementation of Obamacare was questionable by the GOP governors, not the Chosen One or his administration. Carter is the same jackwagon who stated that the only reason people dislike Obama as a president is because he's black. I will say this of Obama, he did bring Hope and Change! His magnificent ability to read from a teleprompter gave stupid people hope, and he changed Washington forever. Now instead of the buck stopping at the Resolute desk, it passes there. Let him be clear, that no one is more upset over the failure of leadership in the United States than Obama. Just as soon as he figures out who is in charge, some sonofabitch is going to hear from the IRS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 NEW SPIN: Yeah, Obama Lied, But He Had To Because You’re Stupid. That should sell. TWEET OF THE DAY: (and a reminder for those "everyone is wrong" apologists on the board) You can’t blame “politics” for the Obamacare website disaster when you lied to get it passed and then again during the entire 2012 campaign. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 But he's really good at killing people http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/11/03/book-alleges-obama-told-aides-about-drone-strikes-im-really-good-at-killing-people/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 But he's really good at killing people http://washington.cb...killing-people/ “The president is always frustrated about leaks,” Pfeiffer said on ABC’s “This Week.” “I haven’t talked to him about this book. I haven’t read it. He hasn’t read it. But he hates leaks.” So if he's frustrated about this being a leak that means he really said it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted November 3, 2013 Share Posted November 3, 2013 So if he's frustrated about this being a leak that means he really said it? Nah, it just means he didn't authorize it. The book doesn't paint him in a heroic light, embarrass his political enemies or put Israel in a tough situation - therefore he didn't leak it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 But he's really good at killing people http://washington.cb...killing-people/ Was he referring to Drones..........................................or Obamacare ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Change the title of the post by omitting the first two words and the ? mark...then ya' got somethin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 THE ECONOMIST catches up with reality: Whoops: Barack Obama’s supporters are worried that he is a terrible manager. This was apparent to more skilled observers sometime in 2009. Related: “They were running the biggest start-up in the world, and they didn’t have anyone who had run a start-up, or even run a business.” . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Certainly. A start up business is like a starting Left Guard in the NFL. They're a dime a dozen. It's so easy, anybody can do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts