/dev/null Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 (edited) http://nymag.com/new...-growth-2013-7/ An interesting but grim theory Edited July 23, 2013 by /dev/null Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 (edited) It's not interesting at all. It's neo-typical, liberal influenced thought in which nothing happens for a reason, and everything is guided by dumb luck rather than predicated on the merits of systemic structures and human choice. The reason for America's era of economic dominance was built upon three factors: 1) an abundance of untapped natural resources and a vast territorial map 2) the unique protections and opportunities afforded by Western Property Law 3) a political and economic environment which encouraged innovation and entrepreneurship Given that, I'll allow you to guess at the reason for our economic decline. Edited July 24, 2013 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 It's not interesting at all. It's neo-typical, liberal influenced thought in which nothing happens for a reason, and everything is guided by dumb luck rather than predicated on the merits of systemic structures and human choice. The reason for America's era of economic dominance was built upon three factors: 1) an abundance of untapped natural resources and a vast territorial map 2) the unique protections and opportunities afforded by Western Property Law 3) a political and economic environment which encouraged innovation and entrepanuership Given that, I'll allow you to guess at the reason for our economic decline. entrepreneurship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 entrepreneurship Thank you. Saddly that's one that I misspell most every single time. Worse yet, I'm aware of it, but for whatever reason fail at it 90% of the time if I'm not focused on my speling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jauronimo Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Thank you. Saddly that's one that I misspell most every single time. Worse yet, I'm aware of it, but for whatever reason fail at it 90% of the time if I'm not focused on my speling. Sadly, spelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 Sadly, spelling. This is not going to be my best thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 24, 2013 Share Posted July 24, 2013 It's not interesting at all. It's neo-typical, liberal influenced thought in which nothing happens for a reason, and everything is guided by dumb luck rather than predicated on the merits of systemic structures and human choice. The reason for America's era of economic dominance was built upon three factors: 1) an abundance of untapped natural resources and a vast territorial map 2) the unique protections and opportunities afforded by Western Property Law 3) a political and economic environment which encouraged innovation and entrepreneurship Given that, I'll allow you to guess at the reason for our economic decline. And the fact that virtually every major competitor on the planet had to entirely rebuild their infrastructure. Thanks, WWII! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts