Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's pretty accurate honestly. That's what the Top 100 should have looked like on NFL network. Could Mario fit on this list? Of course but I can't necessarily find a spot on that list where you could say he deserves it over so and so.

Posted

I want to see a list of the Top 100 Most Stupid Lists.

 

Lists are like polls. They are useless and strictly for entertainment.

Posted

I'm fine with no Mario.

 

He under-performed on a HISTORICALLY bad defense.

 

Spiller should be higher, but his placement is fair given his actual production, not what he should have produced had he been used properly.

Posted

I'm fine with no Mario.

 

He under-performed on a HISTORICALLY bad defense.

 

Spiller should be higher, but his placement is fair given his actual production, not what he should have produced had he been used properly.

 

I'm not....yes, he underperformed on a bad D...but, he still registered double-digit sacks when every opposing coach, in the known world (NFL or not) knew exactly where he would be, every snap he was on the field. Spiller, way to low given his YPC and performance on a less than mediocre offense. Where the *F is Gilmore on this list?

Posted

I'm not....yes, he underperformed on a bad D...but, he still registered double-digit sacks when every opposing coach, in the known world (NFL or not) knew exactly where he would be, every snap he was on the field. Spiller, way to low given his YPC and performance on a less than mediocre offense. Where the *F is Gilmore on this list?

 

:flirt:

 

How half-full of you!

Posted

I'm not....yes, he underperformed on a bad D...but, he still registered double-digit sacks when every opposing coach, in the known world (NFL or not) knew exactly where he would be, every snap he was on the field. Spiller, way to low given his YPC and performance on a less than mediocre offense. Where the *F is Gilmore on this list?

 

I guess I meant to suggest that if all teams benefitted from a list of 'what-ifs' like you've shared above, then we'd probably be lucky to have ONE player crack the list.

Posted

I guess I meant to suggest that if all teams benefitted from a list of 'what-ifs' like you've shared above, then we'd probably be lucky to have ONE player crack the list.

 

I dig what ur sayn'...I guess I was looking at it from a "value to the team" perspective.

 

Seriously...'what if' MW played for a top 10 D?

'what if' Spiller had a coach who knew what he had?

'what if' that was Gilmores 2nd year?

 

Brings a f'n tear to my eye...lol

Posted

I dig what ur sayn'...I guess I was looking at it from a "value to the team" perspective.

 

Seriously...'what if' MW played for a top 10 D?

'what if' Spiller had a coach who knew what he had?

'what if' that was Gilmores 2nd year?

 

Brings a f'n tear to my eye...lol

 

Well, by all reports, Spiller has a many more touches to look forward to. I genuinely hope he can handle/fear he can't. Not based on anything, just guarded optimistic.

 

Many here (myself included) thought Wanny had the stuff to make our defense dominant. He clearly did not. Because of that, I'm cautiously hoping Pettine DOES. As it pertains to Mario--I think moving him around, keeping him "engaged" will go a long way. But only time will tell.

 

Gilmore's a stud. He was a stud last year, he'll be a stud again this year.

Posted

The DEs and pass rushers on the list along with their ranking:

 

3) JJ Watt

8) Von Miller

14) DeMarcus Ware

18) Clay Matthews

20) Aldon Smith

21) Cameron Wake

28) Justin Smith

34) Jason Pierre-Paul

40) Jared Allen

43) Julius Peppers

66) Terrell Suggs

73) Muhammad Wilkerson

86) Calais Campbell

×
×
  • Create New...