I hate 53 page threads

[theesir]

I understand the need for limiting the number of threads on a topic, but there are times someone has a unique insight related to the Byrd matter and it has the potential to sprout its own conversation which is less about Byrd and more about something related; like the thread about teams refusing to play players signed by Parker- a thread that has the potential of a discussion of the roles of agents in team's plans. Should that be buried in a 53 page thread about Jarius Byrd?

 

The idea of having to pick through 53 pages of posts to find those unique insights is rather frustrating.

 

Now that I have said "Byrd" I expect this thread to me merged.

Edited July 15, 2013 by theesir

[mitchmurraydowntown]

In before lock.

[eball]

Consider this theesir's personal Byrd thread.

[mead107]

Byrd Byrd Byrd

[Malazan]

I understand the need for limiting the number of threads on a topic, but there are times someone has a unique insight related to the Byrd matter and it has the potential to sprout its own conversation which is less about Byrd and more about something related; like the thread about teams refusing to play players signed by Parker- a thread that has the potential of a discussion of the roles of agents in team's plans. Should that be buried in a 53 page thread about Jarius Byrd?

 

The idea of having to pick through 53 pages of posts to find those unique insights is rather frustrating.

 

Now that I have said "Byrd" I expect this thread to me merged.

 

Here's a tip for how you tell if you have a unique idea and whether it should be a new thread..

 

You don't. It's not unique and likely is about the original topic.

[theesir]

I'm proposing TBD be limited to six threads only:

One each about:

• Coaches
  
• Offense
  
• Defense
  
• The rest of the league
  
• Patriots*
  
• People Hating WGR
  

[Beerball]

I'm proposing that you stop authoring stupid topics.