Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This stuff goes on a lot. At least what I read somewhere. A website busted a couple doing this just recently after they "shared" pictures on the forum without removing the exif. Images were sent to all their Facebook friends etc... was epic bread. Epic win.

Posted

so why did they show a picture of the dog and not of the teacher?

 

 

What?

Posted

so why did they show a picture of the dog and not of the teacher?

 

 

What?

 

The media's started a contest..."Let's see if that freak Poojer will say yes to this..."

Posted

 

 

Yikes...

 

Isn't it wonderful that Al Gore invented the Internet so the desperation of a few lost and sick people is readily accessible to all. In the good old days such acts would only have been made available for viewing through some shady foreign operation selling pictures in ads of the back pages in a nudie magazine.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

What was against the law 20 years ago is being made legal in many states by changing the definition of a word.

 

In twenty years they may be doing same for bestiality.

Posted

In most, if not all, states, the legislatures found this to be enough of a concern that "buggery" (bestiality) was written into the statutes as grounds for at fault divorce.

Posted

I dunno, but apparently she was in a position of power over the dog.

 

Oh yeah - one of those technicalities!

Posted

Isn't it wonderful that Al Gore invented the Internet so the desperation of a few lost and sick people is readily accessible to all.

Yeah, I think that every time I visit a message board, TSW or otherwise...

Posted

In an ironic twist to the story police learned that the dog could only perform in the missionary position.

 

Ba, dum, ba...

 

:lol:

×
×
  • Create New...