Buftex Posted May 26, 2013 Posted May 26, 2013 (edited) Okay...I am normally a huge sucker for the music threads...but I agree with Chef. Music is way too subjective to define "under-rated" and "over-rated". If Alice and Chains had never released an album, I wouldn't miss them. On the other hand, Elvis being written off as shclock, or "sloppy" or whatever is ludicrous to me. It doesn't make one opinion more correct, and another less so. It just means we appreciate one artist more than another. I hate the Beach Boys, fully aware that some hold them up as genius. That might be true, but I still don't like them. Ditto for Rush, just inducted into the Rock-n'Roll Hall of Fame. I can't presume, just because they don't pass the sniff test for me, the appreciation that so many of them have for them is unwarranted. Some opinions are derived through narrow personal definitions, some with a more historical perspective. The best you can hope, in a discussion like this, is to learn something you never knew, or get turned on to something you never heard. I think you just like Jewels jugs Rated right about where they should be....nice! Edited May 26, 2013 by Buftex
4merper4mer Posted May 26, 2013 Posted May 26, 2013 I know many will disagree, but I think Bruce Springstein is ridiculously overrated. I hear he does a great live show, and who didn't love "Born in the USA", but when I hear his hit songs like "Born to Run" or "Glory Days" come on the radio I feel like I'm listening to Rick Springfield with a grittier voice. As far as Jewel goes, she was a great artist until 2003 when she abandoned her artistic identity for bubble gum pop. If you don't know what I mean listen to "Meant for me" and follow it with "Intuition". In the first song you hear a talented artist singing a song that means something to her; the second is an empty, meaningless, emotionless canned song that might as well have been given to the latest greatest Mickey Mouse Club graduate or American Idol winner. I also agree that Grateful Dead is underrated, often times even by their fans. Sure, not all of their songs are masterpieces, but they've got a lot of gems. I agree about Bruce. I have a weird one: One band I think belongs on both the overrated and underrated list: The Go-Go's Why overrated? Because they were very popular and were absolutely horrible except for having a decent singer. Why underrated? Because they could have sat back and made tons of $$$ in the eighty's but decided to be a little risky right from the beginning. Think of it like this: They got a record deal and MTV was first getting popular. People wrote catchy tunes for them and the world was their oyster. What did they do? They released an anthem to lesbianism as their first single. It was called "I love Cecile". They had the guts to stand up for a cause with their very first song. I'm not sure if they are all gay or just the one who loved Cecile but it doesn't really matter. Guts are underrated.
Rob's House Posted May 26, 2013 Posted May 26, 2013 I agree about Bruce. I have a weird one: One band I think belongs on both the overrated and underrated list: The Go-Go's Why overrated? Because they were very popular and were absolutely horrible except for having a decent singer. Why underrated? Because they could have sat back and made tons of $$$ in the eighty's but decided to be a little risky right from the beginning. Think of it like this: They got a record deal and MTV was first getting popular. People wrote catchy tunes for them and the world was their oyster. What did they do? They released an anthem to lesbianism as their first single. It was called "I love Cecile". They had the guts to stand up for a cause with their very first song. I'm not sure if they are all gay or just the one who loved Cecile but it doesn't really matter. Guts are underrated. They also had the beat. That's underrated too.
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 There are bands that most people revere that I never liked. The Kinks Guns & Roses Any combination of CSNY
Jim in Anchorage Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 This is a true underated band. I remember in their day they had little more than a cult following. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro63WkTz2Gk
Jim in Anchorage Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 (edited) Software woudnt let me add this to above post. Edited May 27, 2013 by Jim in Anchorage
KD in CA Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 There are bands that most people revere that I never liked. The Kinks Guns & Roses Any combination of CSNY I don't listen to the old stuff very often these days, but I liked the Kinks -- they had a lot of great tunes. Ditto for CSNY. Guns & Roses never did much for me. Agreed about Bruce. If he's from the south or west instead of the Jersey shore he's about half as rich and famous as he is now.
Delete This Account Posted May 27, 2013 Author Posted May 27, 2013 (edited) yikes. Springsteen, over-rated?!? easy to cherry pick his hits. more difficult to mine a little deeper to see the depth of his ability, starting with the "Darkness" album, followed up by the prolific "The River" and then "Nebraska." what a holy trinity of albums to come out from one man. all three classics. a case, in fact, could nearly be made that some of his best work is under-rated. "Point Blank." "Ramrod." the near perfect: "Stolen Car." "State Trooper. the actually perfect: "Open All Night." and he didn't stop there, no sir, by recapturing his voice, presence and roots with the back-to-back release of "The Rising" -- perhaps the most powerful post-9/11 album and one that had an underlying spiritual-style feel to it. the title track in itself is a wonderful song. and then add in "Mary's Place," and we're off -- and "Devils and Dust," which just might be his most complete solo album, which says a lot. Devils is his most mature, to say the least. there's hardly a dud among them. jeezus, The Rising's "Lonesome Day" just popped up. Wow. give that a listen. the albums that have followed have been duds, but it doesn't take away the solid collection of songs and influences Bruce has brought to rock and roll. as for this argument about music being subjective: geez, you think? so what. doesn't mean we can't have this discussion every once in a while. and in my defense of my choices, and my responses to some of the arguments being made here, simply trying to provide some personal perspective. let's face it, i called it "one man's insober list" and not "definitive." rock and roll music was born out of boredom and desperation out of the disenfranchised seeking a voice to define themselves. it's a democratizing and finger in the air art form that most anyone can attempt if they have a garage, guitar, amp (note: i didn't write flute.) and free time on their hands. this is my definition of what rock and roll is, an unsettling clamor of chords and lyrics to make us feel heard and/or young and relevant. there's no room for Jethro Tull excesses, and those that i believe deserve in filling out the next 9 spots. jw Nos. 9s coming tomorrow. Edited May 27, 2013 by john wawrow
Delete This Account Posted May 27, 2013 Author Posted May 27, 2013 (edited) I agree about Bruce. I have a weird one: One band I think belongs on both the overrated and underrated list: The Go-Go's Why overrated? Because they were very popular and were absolutely horrible except for having a decent singer. Why underrated? Because they could have sat back and made tons of $$$ in the eighty's but decided to be a little risky right from the beginning. Think of it like this: They got a record deal and MTV was first getting popular. People wrote catchy tunes for them and the world was their oyster. What did they do? They released an anthem to lesbianism as their first single. It was called "I love Cecile". They had the guts to stand up for a cause with their very first song. I'm not sure if they are all gay or just the one who loved Cecile but it doesn't really matter. Guts are underrated. cannot at all agree with your contention that they were all horrible except for Belinda Carlisle. c'mon. Jane Wiedlen was the glue of the Go-Gos and the band's most under-rated member. and Gina Schock's drumming was spot on. and, here is your worst mistake: they didn't have people writing songs for them. they wrote their own. do your research before making these statements. jw Edited May 27, 2013 by john wawrow
Chef Jim Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 (edited) cannot at all agree with your contention that they were all horrible except for Belinda Carlisle. c'mon. Jane Wiedlen was the glue of the Go-Gos and the band's most under-rated member. and Gina Schock's drumming was spot on. and, here is your worst mistake: they didn't have people writing songs for them. they wrote their own. do your research before making these statements. jw How do you know when you're an insufferable music snob? When you take a 4merper4mer post seriously is how. Edited May 27, 2013 by Chef Jim
Chef Jim Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 One thing that always gets my attention in these threads is the difference between live performances and pop/radio edits. While I will be the first one to admit that Dave Matthews has become an absolute mess, they were amazing in concert in the early 90's when they built their reputation. Unfortunately, drugs and alcohol destroyed them and at this point they're embarrassing themselves. Another band along those lines that I will throw in the underrated category is Blues Traveler. If you only listened to their songs on the radio or their one popular CD, you'd think they were crap, but seeing them live was one of the better music experiences I've ever had. That's why I tend to only purchase live performances. You get the raw music and not some over produced/engineered crap.
4merper4mer Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 cannot at all agree with your contention that they were all horrible except for Belinda Carlisle. c'mon. Jane Wiedlen was the glue of the Go-Gos and the band's most under-rated member. and Gina Schock's drumming was spot on. and, here is your worst mistake: they didn't have people writing songs for them. they wrote their own. do your research before making these statements. jw You know a lot about them. I didn't know they wrote their own crap. Which one loved Cecile?
bbb Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 yikes. Springsteen, over-rated?!? easy to cherry pick his hits. more difficult to mine a little deeper to see the depth of his ability, starting with the "Darkness" album, followed up by the prolific "The River" and then "Nebraska." what a holy trinity of albums to come out from one man. all three classics. a case, in fact, could nearly be made that some of his best work is under-rated. "Point Blank." "Ramrod." the near perfect: "Stolen Car." "State Trooper. the actually perfect: "Open All Night." and he didn't stop there, no sir, by recapturing his voice, presence and roots with the back-to-back release of "The Rising" -- perhaps the most powerful post-9/11 album and one that had an underlying spiritual-style feel to it. the title track in itself is a wonderful song. and then add in "Mary's Place," and we're off -- and "Devils and Dust," which just might be his most complete solo album, which says a lot. Devils is his most mature, to say the least. there's hardly a dud among them. jeezus, The Rising's "Lonesome Day" just popped up. Wow. give that a listen. the albums that have followed have been duds, but it doesn't take away the solid collection of songs and influences Bruce has brought to rock and roll. as for this argument about music being subjective: geez, you think? so what. doesn't mean we can't have this discussion every once in a while. and in my defense of my choices, and my responses to some of the arguments being made here, simply trying to provide some personal perspective. let's face it, i called it "one man's insober list" and not "definitive." rock and roll music was born out of boredom and desperation out of the disenfranchised seeking a voice to define themselves. it's a democratizing and finger in the air art form that most anyone can attempt if they have a garage, guitar, amp (note: i didn't write flute.) and free time on their hands. this is my definition of what rock and roll is, an unsettling clamor of chords and lyrics to make us feel heard and/or young and relevant. there's no room for Jethro Tull excesses, and those that i believe deserve in filling out the next 9 spots. jw Nos. 9s coming tomorrow. Thank you. I think I'll take just about every music critic ever's opinion over somebody who heard that he's good live and who doesn't love Born in the USA............As somebody who has seen Bruce 25 times, I can say I don't love that song, at all. His lives shows are religious experiences.
BuffaloBill Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 Overrated : Phil Collins/Genesis Underrated : Peter Gabriel I think it depends on what Genesis period you refer to. One could argue they are under-rated in the early to mid years when they were good IMO. I think the Then there were Three album may have been the turning point. I know many will disagree, but I think Bruce Springstein is ridiculously overrated. I hear he does a great live show, and who didn't love "Born in the USA", but when I hear his hit songs like "Born to Run" or "Glory Days" come on the radio I feel like I'm listening to Rick Springfield with a grittier voice. I could not agree more. I never understood the Bruce craze. Finally, while many will passionately disagree I think the Beattles are way over-rated. I think much of their music simply sucks.
Buftex Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 That's why I tend to only purchase live performances. You get the raw music and not some over produced/engineered crap. Funny....I feel the same way sometimes. I have a buddy who has a music collection that rivals mine (4000+ CDs/vinyl) and one day, why hanging out at his place listeing to music I started talking to him about the live Faces album "Coast to Coast and Overtures"...he said he had never heard it...in fact, he told me, has almost no live albums in his collection...I couldn't believe it... I love live performance stuff. I like studio stuff too, but a live performance can give you a whole different feel for a tune.
bbb Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 I think it depends on what Genesis period you refer to. One could argue they are under-rated in the early to mid years when they were good IMO. I think the Then there were Three album may have been the turning point. I could not agree more. I never understood the Bruce craze. I do think that album was the turning point for Genesis. It is not a craze when it's 40 years of sustained excellence!!
Buftex Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 as noted, got more coming. thinking of releasing the latest Tuesday morning. a few thoughts: Elvis Presley can never be over-rated despite his long, slow, spiral into sloppiness. that said, i would suggest that he was the least interesting and least talented of the Sun Studios' Mount Rushmore rounded out by Johnny Cash, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis. now those three could rock. Funny...everyone always forgets Charlie Rich....IMO, the ranking goes Elvis, Charlie Rich, Perkins, Jerry Lee and then Cash. If it is a Mount Rushmore, Cash is the one I leave off. I think Johnny has benefitted mightily from the hipster makeover over the last 15-20 years. If you go back and really listen to his catalog, it spirals every bit as far into slopiness that Elvis' ever did..he just lived long enough to be saved by the young turks. That doesnt' mean to say I don't like him... How do you know when you're an insufferable music snob? When you take a 4merper4mer post seriously is how.
Doc Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 This thread is overrated. Taste is subjective. And just because you like an artist's or a band's song or songs, it doesn't mean you have to like everything by him/her/them, or even him/her/the band.
Chef Jim Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 I think it depends on what Genesis period you refer to. One could argue they are under-rated in the early to mid years when they were good IMO. I think the Then there were Three album may have been the turning point. One could argue? No I think it's 100% certain. They were uber underrated during the Peter Gabriel years and WAY overrated after. Su, su, sussudio. Are you !@#$ing kidding me. Funny....I feel the same way sometimes. I have a buddy who has a music collection that rivals mine (4000+ CDs/vinyl) and one day, why hanging out at his place listeing to music I started talking to him about the live Faces album "Coast to Coast and Overtures"...he said he had never heard it...in fact, he told me, has almost no live albums in his collection...I couldn't believe it... I love live performance stuff. I like studio stuff too, but a live performance can give you a whole different feel for a tune. Hmmm...Chef Jim and Buftex are growing up. Lately we've been agreeing more than disagreeing.
bbb Posted May 27, 2013 Posted May 27, 2013 Isn't it agreed that Sussudio is pretty much the worst crap ever put on a recording? BTW, my vote for overrated is GNR..............And, the thing is probably my all time favorite song is Sweet Child O Mine...........But, everything else I have tried to get into and just can't. None of it has the melody of Sweet Child. Just repetitive pounding.
Recommended Posts