B-Man Posted May 22, 2013 Share Posted May 22, 2013 Wow. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted May 22, 2013 Share Posted May 22, 2013 Is this like that TV show where the guy got tomorrow's newspaper today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 22, 2013 Author Share Posted May 22, 2013 More on that, TERRORIST ATTACK IN BRITAIN. A man thought to be a British soldier has been killed by Islamist terrorists in a horrific attack in broad daylight in a London street. Two men ran the victim over with a car before hacking him to death with knives and a machete, while shouting “Allahu Akbar.” The attackers apparently filmed themselves carrying out the killing, and invited stunned bystanders to take photos and video of them posing beside their victim. Video has been aired on ITV news of one of the attackers brandishing a blood-stained machete and shouting at bystanders, as onlookers tried to help the slain man. He’s heard saying “I apologize that women had to witness this today, but in our lands women have to see the same.” Judging by the accent of the man speaking in the video, he’s either British born or has spent some years in the country, making it likely that the terrorists were “home-grown,” rather than from outside the country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted May 22, 2013 Share Posted May 22, 2013 More on that, Thank God Britain has strong gun laws or who knows what would have happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted May 22, 2013 Share Posted May 22, 2013 Thank God Britain has strong gun laws or who knows what would have happened? I hope they won't pay those guys $278,000. And at least we know where the British PM was and that he returned home. I wonder if it had been an ambassador having his body dragged through the street of a foreign country if the British PM would check out and never tell anyone of his whereabouts during that time. I think the answer is yes if the British people would sit idly by and accept it. You know when we should stop sitting idly by and accepting this crap? I think you do know. We all do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Just another case of workplace violence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Just another case of workplace violence. No. Not "workplace violence." Road rage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 No. Not "workplace violence." Road rage. Well by the looks of the murder weapons I'm thinking Kitchen Nighmares. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Obviously an obscure YouTube video is to blame. We all know it Can't be terrorists scumbags using Islam as justification to commit terrible acts of violence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Obviously an obscure YouTube video is to blame. We all know it Can't be terrorists scumbags using Islam as justification to commit terrible acts of violence. Racist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 No. Not "workplace violence." Road rage. Shall we revisit ideology vs strategy & goals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Shall we revisit ideology vs strategy & goals? No need, I'm still right. Strategy and organization define terrorism, ideology merely motivates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 No need, I'm still right. Strategy and organization define terrorism, ideology merely motivates. In that case you can't call Al Qeda & it adherents terrorists anymore, because it's no longer a classically defined organization and all it now has is a message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 In that case you can't call Al Qeda & it adherents terrorists anymore, because it's no longer a classically defined organization and all it now has is a message. Who said "classically defined organization"? There are many, MANY different ways to organize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Who said "classically defined organization"? There are many, MANY different ways to organize. How does "Al Quaeda" translate into English? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 How does "Al Quaeda" translate into English? "Our Thing", brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Who said "classically defined organization"? There are many, MANY different ways to organize. OK, then. Would you define Al Qeda as having a strategy and organization? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 OK, then. Would you define Al Qeda as having a strategy and organization? They have a strategy and a purposely limited organization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 At least he apologized for women having to see his evil act. /s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanM.D. Posted May 23, 2013 Share Posted May 23, 2013 Wow. That pretty much sums this up. Wow. These guys are subhuman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts