Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 429
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I was going to say something similar. If Williams can prove himself maybe we're not so bad off without Byrd.

Yeah, well in that scenario you would only have another guy looking to get paid in a few years. We have to sign the good players we have unless it's absolutely not possible to do so. We already lost Levitre. Losing Byrd as well is unacceptable. Two good safeties is much better than one good safety and some question marks (although I believe our depth there is good - it's still another matter; we need to keep our home-grown talent).

Posted

Crap, that must mean our defense sucks. Doomed!

 

The ball was thrown into "tight coverage." That means that the offense executed extraordinarily well, and the defense was sound but just beat by an awesome play.

 

So, I think our offense and defense are both looking great, EJ Manuel will be the starting QB, and the Super Bowl is within our grasp.

 

(And that's how you analyze a tweet of a single mini-camp play).

Posted (edited)

The ball was thrown into "tight coverage." That means that the offense executed extraordinarily well, and the defense was sound but just beat by an awesome play.

 

So, I think our offense and defense are both looking great, EJ Manuel will be the starting QB, and the Super Bowl is within our grasp.

 

(And that's how you analyze a tweet of a single mini-camp play).

Go back and read again. The O had an INT - so the O is crap. The D let the O have a TD, so the D is crap. We're letting young players have a chance to prove themselves - so the vets are crap. We've got some players that are making other players expendable, so the whole team is crap. And if we get draft picks for a Byrd in the hand instead of lavishing QB money on him making it impossible to re-sign any other players beyond their rookie contracts, we're BillFanOne!

Edited by Nanker
Posted

Go back and read again. The O had an INT - so the O is crap. The D let the O have a TD, so the D is crap. We're letting young players have a chance to prove themselves - so the vets are crap. We've got some players that are making other players expendable, so the whole team is crap. And if we get draft picks for a Byrd in the hand instead of lavishing QB money on him making it impossible to re-sign any other players beyond their rookie contracts, we're BillFanOne!

 

You, sir, have cracked the code.

 

PTR

Posted

You, sir, have cracked the code.

 

PTR

 

The only thing missing is the implicit cheapness / complete lack of Football knowledge demonstrated by everyone from the owner down to the guy that runs the security booth where the players enter One Bills Drive...

Posted (edited)

@Rich1270TheFan

Bills notes...shocker Aaron Williams with 2 INTs in 2 days incl one covering fastest guy on team Flash Goodwin..taught TX rook somethin

 

@Rich1270TheFan

Bills note...Pettines confusing opposing offense...had bunch of QB pressures and sacks today..OL human turnstiles today

Edited by 26CornerBlitz
Posted

The positive here is that if our OL can get it down against Pettine's defense they will be able to handle the good pressure defenses of the league

 

I find it very encouraging that the pass rush is dominating the OL at this stage-- they should be. Something would seem wrong if they weren't getting pressure on an offense that was installed within the last month.

Posted

I was going to say something similar. If Williams can prove himself maybe we're not so bad off without Byrd.

Thinking like this is why this franchise is in the straits it is....you don't let assets walk when you hit it right in the draft... Wouldn't we be a better team with both on the roster???

Posted

Wow. A whole practice just staring upward? I hope they get to more advanced exercises soon.

They're just trying to show support for Leodis.

You know the peripheral vision exercise.

One for all and all for one.

×
×
  • Create New...