JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/texas-judge-issues-double-entendre-filled-ruling-strip-151235719.html In his ruling on an injunction to stop enforcement of a law that forces a strip club's dancers to wear bikini tops: Plaintiffs clothe themselves in the First Amendment seeking to provide cover against another alleged naked grab of unconstitutional power. Plaintiffs, and by extension their customers, seek an erection of a constitutional wall separating themselves from the regulatory power of City government. While the Court has not received amicus curiae briefs, the Court has been blessed with volunteers known in South Texas as 'curious amigos' to be inspectors general to perform on sight visits at the locations in question. Should the parties choose to string this case out to trial on the merits, the Court encourages reasonable discovery intercourse as they navigate the peaks and valleys of litigation, perhaps to reach a happy ending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhg Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Brilliant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfanmiami(oh) Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Haha wow that's great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 It certainly strips the situation down to the naked truth while titilating the intellect with provocative thought laid bare for all to see. Two breasts up for the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 "On sight" visits? Really? Note to judge: fire clerk, get new one that's literate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 "On sight" visits? Really? Note to judge: fire clerk, get new one that's literate. It may have been a pun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 It may have been a pun. It clearly was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 It may have been a pun. Pretty damn awful one if it was. It's the third time this week I've seen "site/sight" misused in professional writing (and the first two were egregious), so I'm a little over-sensitized to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JÂy RÛßeÒ Posted May 3, 2013 Author Share Posted May 3, 2013 Pretty damn awful one if it was. It's the third time this week I've seen "site/sight" misused in professional writing (and the first two were egregious), so I'm a little over-sensitized to it. Irregardless... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Poojer Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 things are tough all over Pretty damn awful one if it was. It's the third time this week I've seen "site/sight" misused in professional writing (and the first two were egregious), so I'm a little over-sensitized to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 I'll bet there was an 'erection' of a constitutional wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juror#8 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 http://news.yahoo.co...-151235719.html In his ruling on an injunction to stop enforcement of a law that forces a strip club's dancers to wear bikini tops: Plaintiffs clothe themselves in the First Amendment seeking to provide cover against another alleged naked grab of unconstitutional power. Plaintiffs, and by extension their customers, seek an erection of a constitutional wall separating themselves from the regulatory power of City government. While the Court has not received amicus curiae briefs, the Court has been blessed with volunteers known in South Texas as 'curious amigos' to be inspectors general to perform on sight visits at the locations in question. Should the parties choose to string this case out to trial on the merits, the Court encourages reasonable discovery intercourse as they navigate the peaks and valleys of litigation, perhaps to reach a happy ending. "Brilliant ruling!" he ejaculated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowery4 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Wait ...... why do they have to cover their nipples? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Wait ...... why do they have to cover their nipples? Because the sight of them will turn men into a horde of horny, sex crazed maniacs. This is significantly different from their normal condition of being a horny, sex crazed horde of maniacs.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 If you liked his ruling, you should love this from the Daily News http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/chinese-newspaper-headquarters-stuns-article-1.1339284 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 If you liked his ruling, you should love this from the Daily News http://www.nydailyne...ticle-1.1339284 Those commies are a bunch of dicks; so cocksure that they know what's best for their people. I don't condom that style of government, what a bunch of jerks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Jack Posted May 10, 2013 Share Posted May 10, 2013 If you liked his ruling, you should love this from the Daily News http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/chinese-newspaper-headquarters-stuns-article-1.1339284 http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/158140-chinas-people-daily-is-building-a-new-headquarters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts