Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

WR: Woods, Hunter, & Allen

TE: Ertz & Kelce

LB: Minter & Brown

DB: Banks & Cyprien

 

I would be most happy with Robert Woods and Zach Ertz in round 2, but would be happy with any of these players as long as one of them is a WR.

Posted

WR: Woods, Hunter, & Allen

TE: Ertz & Kelce

LB: Minter & Brown

DB: Banks & Cyprien

 

I would be most happy with Robert Woods and Zach Ertz in round 2, but would be happy with any of these players as long as one of them is a WR.

That would be great. If we could get Woods or Hunter and Ertz, I would be ecstatic.

Posted

This is a big day for Buddy...his draft record in the 2nd round has been suspect at best. Two chances to correct that tonight!

Posted

Some guys to maybe talk about

 

Stanford TE Ertz

ILBs Teo and Minter

S Cyprien

WRs woods, allen

 

Lots of good options on the board

 

I'm loving how our second round situation looks. We have our QB, and Cleveland, Philadelphia, Jacksonville and NYJ's, the people who were being eyed to take a QB, don't. I'm shocked at Minter and Te'o dropping, and unless we have Dansby for sure, one of those two would be hard to ignore.

 

If we have Dansby, then Ertz, Woods and Hunter would all be extremely welcome picks.

Posted

I'm hoping the run on QBs starts in R2 with Jax.

 

That would be beautiful, right? Looking good for tonight.

Posted

It would be awesome if we could land WR Hunter with our next pick, if not then perhaps WR Woods or LB Minter. The whole thought of EJ & Hunter together with the rest of our crew would be Great!

Posted

41 - Woods

46 - Ertz

 

then immediately sign Dansby

 

This is exactly what I want. I think that Ertz is going to go to SF though.

 

I just read in two stories we have two picks in the 3rd, NOT the 2nd.

 

Can someone please verify this isn't true? Huge difference between 2nd and 3rd.

 

Two picks in the 2nd 41 and 46 and then they swapped 3rds with STL (went from 71 to 78)

Posted

 

 

There will be a run on the QBs at the top of the 2nd round. I expect all the above to be available when the bills pick at 41 and 46

 

^this

Posted

I think Da'Rick Rogers

 

I agree.. The scouting on this guy is that he can go up and get the ball. He had a 39.5" verticle at combine. Hes big at 6'2" 220lbs. All nix has been saying the whole time is he wants a big guy that can go up and catch the ball when hes covered. Sounds like a good match to me. He tore it up at tennessee before the drug issues. If he cleaned up his life I see it as a good pick.

 

Justin Hunter, another big guy with huge verticle : 6'4" 200lbs with 39.5 verticle.

 

I'm def excited to see what we do. Ertz is intriguing also as a big receiving target.

Posted

I'm hoping the run on QBs starts in R2 with Jax.

 

That's the beauty of what Buffalo did. If you only look at one pick - our first rounder - then some might say, purely on a pre-draft ranking, that we took a QB too early, or lost value with that pick. BUT, if you factor in our first AND second round picks, and present Manuel, and lets say Hunter and Minter, then all of a sudden those 3 picks - as opposed to, say, Milliner and Wilson, for instance, had we gone CB in rd 1 instead of trading down - our decision to take a QB and move on looks smart, and I'm thrilled with it. I couldn't have mocked us a better situation!

 

I'll take Margus Hunt and Terron Armstead I'm not nearly as confidant in our lines as Nix seems to be

 

Another Beautiful thing with our 2nd round position - there's so many ways to go that would be great, and those two would be AWESOME, too!

×
×
  • Create New...