PromoTheRobot Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 The Colts are opening a 55-gallon drum of whoopass on the Broncos. If we had beat Pittsburgh, we'd be playing the Colts now. I have to wonder if we would be faring any better. As good as the Colts look now. It means nothing unless they beat the Pats. They haven't done anything this year until the beat 'em. And I hope they do, but I have learned betting against the Patriots is dangerius. PTR
rockpile Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 The Colts are opening a 55-gallon drum of whoopass on the Broncos. If we had beat Pittsburgh, we'd be playing the Colts now. I have to wonder if we would be faring any better. As good as the Colts look now. It means nothing unless they beat the Pats. They haven't done anything this year until the beat 'em. And I hope they do, but I have learned betting against the Patriots is dangerius. PTR 199359[/snapback] We would not be behind by more than three touchdowns
gantrules Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 I'd say Baltimore, Jax and Buffalo could have made this a better game.
crackur Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 theres a difference.........OUR D wouldnt give that up and We could atleast score on COLTS D is our Line stood up
Greg de'Ville Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 ...Bills wouldn't have won today in all likelihood. Colts are too tough. But I'da hoped they could have put up say 10 or 17 in the half. Denver's defense is just plain offensive! Not even close to the Bills.
Ray Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 We'd still lose this game and lose bad I think. This lets me relax a bit about the Pittsburgh loss. If I had watched a beating against the Bills like this I'd go crazy. Indy at home was just primed to destroy whoever they played. Broncos had 4th best D in the league by the way--only two behind us. Our secondary would have been chewed up as well--but not as bad. Indy is just so tough at home when they get on a roll.
Rico Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 Honestly, it'd be a disaster. Colts would've jumped out to a lead, though maybe not as big or as fast as this one, and it would've been up to #11 to get us back in the game.
mead107 Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 Honestly, it'd be a disaster.Colts would've jumped out to a lead, though maybe not as big or as fast as this one, and it would've been up to #11 to get us back in the game. 199405[/snapback]
TigerJ Posted January 9, 2005 Posted January 9, 2005 Buffalo would have lost, but I don't think it would have been as one sided. I think Buffalo is a better team than Denver. I think the Bills were not ready mentally for the Steelers. No, I don't think the Bills are a match for the Steelers at full strength, but I don't think the Steelers backups are better than Buffalo's starters.
Recommended Posts