meazza Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 I Google "bulletproof car" and I get five pages of bulletproof cars before I get that. You sure you didn't use Bing? You're right. But I just re-googled "bullet proof cars" and it shows up on row 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Come In Peace Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 I Google "bulletproof car" and I get five pages of bulletproof cars before I get that. You sure you didn't use Bing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 You're right. But I just re-googled "bullet proof cars" and it shows up on row 4. Is that some kind of Canadian google? I don't see that at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 Is that some kind of Canadian google? I don't see that at all With the space between bullet and proof? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 With the space between bullet and proof? Missed the image part of the initial search. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 So, should we outlaw all firearms for everyone, knowing that the bad/sick guys don't give a schit about laws and will do their thing anyways knowing that "gun free zones" are "fun free zones" in their minds or mandate that everyone carry a gun for self protection? When you say "something has to be done", would you actually consider mandating arming everyone, or are you just proposing eliminating all private ownership of firearms? Please change your stance. Agreeing with you is something I find uncomfortable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 Please change your stance. Agreeing with you is something I find uncomfortable There is a 50% chance you will agree with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted April 16, 2013 Author Share Posted April 16, 2013 (edited) So basically you want to ban remote control cars. /golfclap Actually I don't have a view on drone regulation yet. Hadn't even thought of potential for civilian use until I read the article. Of course there is some comparison to the gun debate, but that's not the whole story. I only posted it as a discussion piece. Edited April 16, 2013 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 16, 2013 Share Posted April 16, 2013 There is a 50% chance you will agree with him. Nothing about this is 50% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 So what are you saying: Guns don't kill people, people do .... but drones DO kill people? It is already illegal in this country to attach a weapon to a radio controlled model airplane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 It is already illegal in this country to attach a weapon to a radio controlled model airplane. What if you have really tiny pilots? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Nothing about this is 50% I think it's more like 6 in one and half a dozen in the other. Which way are you leaning today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I think it's more like 6 in one and half a dozen in the other. Which way are you leaning today? I think it's more like 6 in one and half a dozen in the other. Which way are you leaning today? I could answer that, but I doubt you were trained to count that high when you were 'in service' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I could answer that, but I doubt you were trained to count that high when you were 'in service' Quote me twice there Adam. Were you trained to count that high? Don't let it bother you, you're an ok guy. It's tough to play in the NHL when you first come out of Juniors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Quote me twice there Adam. Were you trained to count that high? Don't let it bother you, you're an ok guy. It's tough to play in the NHL when you first come out of Juniors. Yawn. The thought of you defending us would be a lot scarier, had it been true. I'm surprised you can count to two, there may be more hope for you, than I thought. If you want to troll. Come up with something insulting, as this is pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts