3rdnlng Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 1:38 PM, Joe_the_6_pack said: Your proposal is status quo/do nothing? Have you ever once brought anything meaningful to a discussion? If so, can you show it?
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:05 AM, Joe_the_6_pack said: Why is citizen drone regulation not a legitimate question? In the face of emerging technology its a question that will increasingly need to be addressed. In the case of drones its not just weapons its also a surveillance/privacy matter. So basically you want to ban remote control cars. /golfclap
IDBillzFan Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 1:38 PM, Joe_the_6_pack said: Your proposal is status quo/do nothing? Don't you get tired of justifying more laws and regulations because of "the status quo?" The last time I heard the word "status quo" we ended up with the single most embarrassing and useless legislation every shoved down a country's throat by all Democrat congress that didn't even both to read, let alone understand, just how bad the law would be. Doing something so you don't do nothing is a ridiculous reason to do something.
DC Tom Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 2:53 PM, LABillzFan said: The last time I heard the word "status quo" we ended up with the single most embarrassing and useless legislation every shoved down a country's throat by all Democrat congress that didn't even both to read, let alone understand, just how bad the law would be. Can you be more specific?
IDBillzFan Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 3:03 PM, DC Tom said: Can you be more specific? This is where I normally do the line of emoticons that starts with a laughing guy, then a smiling guy, then a confused guy and then a crying guy. But I sold my emoticon quota to OC for a Padron 1964 Series Exclusivo Maduro and a box of HoHos.
3rdnlng Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 2:53 PM, LABillzFan said: Don't you get tired of justifying more laws and regulations because of "the status quo?" The last time I heard the word "status quo" we ended up with the single most embarrassing and useless legislation every shoved down a country's throat by all Democrat congress that didn't even both to read, let alone understand, just how bad the law would be. Doing something so you don't do nothing is a ridiculous reason to do something. But he's a self proclaimed libertarian. Aren't they for more regulations and laws?
Chef Jim Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 (edited) On 4/16/2013 at 1:38 PM, Joe_the_6_pack said: Your proposal is status quo/do nothing? So in your tiny mind that is your conclusion. I ask to hear someone's proposal and you conclude that I say we do nothing?? Once again I live in the hills above Oakland, one of the most gun violent cities in America. My wife rides her scooter though the war zone to and from BART every day. She could very easily get hit in the cross fire of some gang related shooting. This is were the true problem with guns lie. Not some white suburban school that gets shot up every few years. So I ask how are background checks and limiting the number of bullets one can buy going to change ANY of that? Yeah that's right. I't WON'T!! On 4/16/2013 at 3:10 PM, LABillzFan said: This is where I normally do the line of emoticons that starts with a laughing guy, then a smiling guy, then a confused guy and then a crying guy. But I sold my emoticon quota to OC for a Padron 1964 Series Exclusivo Maduro and a box of HoHos. So you sold your emoticon quota not for an asset that depreciates but one that literally disappears?? Edited April 16, 2013 by Chef Jim
IDBillzFan Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 3:49 PM, Chef Jim said: So you sold your emoticon quota not for an asset the depreciates but one that literally disappears?? I'm pretty easy that way.
Chef Jim Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 3:54 PM, LABillzFan said: I'm pretty easy that way. As are many of my clients. Oh and yes I'm client too.
meazza Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 3:49 PM, Chef Jim said: So in your tiny mind that is your conclusion. I ask to hear someone's proposal and you conclude that I say we do nothing?? Once again I live in the hills above Oakland, one of the most gun violent cities in America. My wife rides her scooter though the war zone to and from BART every day. She could very easily get hit in the cross fire of some gang related shooting. This is were the true problem with guns lie. Not some white suburban school that gets shot up every few years. So I ask how are background checks and limiting the number of bullets one can buy going to change ANY of that? Yeah that's right. I't WON'T!! May I suggest a bullet proof scooter?
IDBillzFan Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 (edited) On 4/16/2013 at 4:39 PM, meazza said: May I suggest a bullet proof scooter? Or something that's not a scooter. Like, y'know, a car. Edited April 16, 2013 by LABillzFan
Chef Jim Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:02 PM, LABillzFan said: Or something that's not a scooter. Like, y'know, a car. Because no one's every been shot while driving through Oakland........never!
meazza Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 (edited) On 4/16/2013 at 5:03 PM, Chef Jim said: Because no one's every been shot while driving through Oakland........never! Suggestion # 2 Edited April 16, 2013 by meazza
IDBillzFan Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:03 PM, Chef Jim said: Because no one's every been shot while driving through Oakland........never! I can definitely see where the scooter will increase the odds of a safer trip.
Chef Jim Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:17 PM, LABillzFan said: I can definitely see where the scooter will increase the odds of a safer trip. Well she does wear a full face helmet.
DC Tom Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:07 PM, meazza said: Suggestion # 2 A BA-64? That hardly qualifies as bulletproof.
Chef Jim Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:07 PM, meazza said: Suggestion # 2 Nope, you've never been to Fruitvale and International Blvd in Oakland I take it.
meazza Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:37 PM, DC Tom said: A BA-64? That hardly qualifies as bulletproof. I just google imaged Bulletproof car and this came up. On 4/16/2013 at 5:39 PM, Chef Jim said: Nope, you've never been to Fruitvale and International Blvd in Oakland I take it. Maybe one day
Chef Jim Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:48 PM, meazza said: I just google imaged Bulletproof car and this came up. Maybe one day Great tacos down there.
DC Tom Posted April 16, 2013 Posted April 16, 2013 On 4/16/2013 at 5:48 PM, meazza said: I just google imaged Bulletproof car and this came up. I Google "bulletproof car" and I get five pages of bulletproof cars before I get that. You sure you didn't use Bing?
Recommended Posts