Astrobot Posted April 11, 2013 Posted April 11, 2013 (edited) I want a QB with winning stats. Sure, stats don't tell the whole story, but for the sake of comparing QBs by stats, I want one that each SEASON has the following stats: CMP >240 ATT >300 YDS >3,500 PCT COMPLETIONS >64% YARDS PER ATTEMPT > 8.0 yds. LONGEST PASS PLAY > 75 yds. TOUCHDOWNS >= 22 TD:INT RATIO > 2.7 to 1 TD:SACK RATIO > 2.0 to 1 QB RATING > 143 To see the results of my comparisons of the QBs the Bills might be targeting and how they measure up, load it here: http://www.deankindi...m/QBCompare.doc Astro Edited April 11, 2013 by Astrobot
KOKBILLS Posted April 11, 2013 Posted April 11, 2013 That cut and paste did not translate well Astro...But I 100% agree with the outcome...EJ is my favorite QB in this Draft...Good work! Just wish it was easier to read...
Astrobot Posted April 11, 2013 Author Posted April 11, 2013 (edited) Working on it...try now. See if it loads a blue chart in MS Word with green highlights. It may be in your downloads at the bottom of your screen. Astro Edited April 11, 2013 by Astrobot
Astrobot Posted April 12, 2013 Author Posted April 12, 2013 (edited) Some results I found: # Times Each QB >My 10 Target Numbers in 3 Yrs: ------------------Smith(24), Jones(23), Barkley(18), Wilson(16), Manuel(15), Bray(14), Glennon(10), Nassib(9), Scott(7), Klein(5) Improved in 10 Metrics Every Year of Last 3: ------------------Smith, Manuel. Nassib, Bray, Glennon, Scott Completion Percentage Over 64% Last 2 Years: ------------------Manuel, Smith QBR Over 143 Last 3 Years: ------------------Manuel, Smith, Wilson TD:INT Ratio was > 2.7 to 1 for three seasons: ------------------Smith, Jones TD:INT Ratio was > 2.7 to 1 for two seasons: -------------------Smith, Jones, Bray Passing Yards Per Attempt Was Over 8 yds. for three seasons: Bray, Wilson, Manuel Passing Yards Per Attempt Was Over 8 yds. for two seasons: Bray, Wilson, Manuel, Smith Yards Over 3,500 For three seasons: Jones Yards Over 3,500 For two seasons: Jones, Wilson, Smith Edited April 12, 2013 by Astrobot
boyst Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 http://i.imgur.com/tlsTxp5.jpg A link for those who do not want to download or do not have access to word because they are MacFanboys. Hope you do not mind Astro. IMG:
boyst Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 You Rock! I could have done it easier by saving your word file as a webfile/html. Feel free to PM in the future if I miss any posts or such like this, give me a little time and I can get you images or pasteable spreadsheets online that are public.
KOKBILLS Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 Working on it...try now. See if it loads a blue chart in MS Word with green highlights. It may be in your downloads at the bottom of your screen. Astro Yes that worked..Thanks Bro...
Mango Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 until the 'nascar package' which seems to be a super hurry up single read option package, nassib is pretty unremarkable. this is good news for buffalo because we have an offensive coordinator who can scheme and take the pressure of the qb in reading defenses and putting the ball on point. our offense could develop some nice rhythm. the bad news is nassib is a product of the system
Doc Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 until the 'nascar package' which seems to be a super hurry up single read option package, nassib is pretty unremarkable. this is good news for buffalo because we have an offensive coordinator who can scheme and take the pressure of the qb in reading defenses and putting the ball on point. our offense could develop some nice rhythm. the bad news is nassib is a product of the system But...the Bills will be employing that system.
Mango Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 But...the Bills will be employing that system. that's the point. i think hackett and marrone where able to put together a good ncaa offense, with an unremarkable quarterback. coaching to hide flaws and exaggerate strengths.
Dorkington Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 that's the point. i think hackett and marrone where able to put together a good ncaa offense, with an unremarkable quarterback. coaching to hide flaws and exaggerate strengths. So... we just hired a younger Chan Gailey. Sweet.
Doc Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 that's the point. i think hackett and marrone where able to put together a good ncaa offense, with an unremarkable quarterback. coaching to hide flaws and exaggerate strengths. Maybe the quarterback was remarkable, but the rest of the offense was unremarkable? Compared to, say, Geno Smith, who many think had a remarkable offense around him.
KeisterHollow Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 I don't think I'm taking the same from this as many of you. It certainly makes Geno Smith look great - but I wonder how much of that was a product of that system...still, his stats are very good. It aslo reinforces my like of Matt Barkley - still my favorite - but it also elevates Tyler Wilson and Landry Jones. I've got to say - my favorites, in this order, are Barkley, Smith, Manuel/Wilson (both are about equally appealing to me), Nassib, Bray, Jones, Glennon, Scott, and Dysert. I'd be happy with Barkley or Smith at the top of round 1, Manuel or Wilson at the bottom - via trade back, or top of round 2, Nassib or Bray between rounds 2 and 3, or Jones, Scott, Glennon or Dysert after round 3.
Kellyto83TD Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 Is it me or the guy with the most green is Landry Jones who I don't want within 500 miles of Buffalo?
KeisterHollow Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 I think the Scott BEST YPA over 2 years is wrong - shouldn't it be much less?
Kellyto83TD Posted April 12, 2013 Posted April 12, 2013 I still say trade down, take a QB later even in round II
Recommended Posts