section122 Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 SJ needs to give up twitter You need to give up this site. Negative Nancy.
Justice Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 It's a joke. Ppl need to learn how to relax a little and not take things so seriously.
Stevie Ray Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 It's a joke. Ppl need to learn how to relax a little and not take things so seriously. Absolutely! what a friggen hypersensitive country this has become. Lets pass a law to ban humor and joking.
BringBackFergy Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 I bet that's why Patrick Chung moved from New England to Philly. He's probably Korean and knew something was gonna happen in Foxboro. Good move Mr. Chung...good move.
Buftex Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 You need to give up this site. Negative Nancy. Mean Mary! I bet that's why Patrick Chung moved from New England to Philly. He's probably Korean and knew something was gonna happen in Foxboro. Good move Mr. Chung...good move.
White Linen Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 Humor is the key word here. This is totally a non-issue. For USA Today to run with it is ludicrous. It was a tongue-in-cheek comment by Stevie, nothing more than a joke on his part. It wasn't meant to be taken seriously. The 'PC Police' who jump him for this need to chill out. There's nothing funny about what's going on in North Korea but people use humor as a coping mechanism to diffuse tense situations all the time. Either you like Stevie or you don't and those who don't will look for any and everything to use against him. Perfectly said Sir!
thebandit27 Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 I say again: nobody can make anybody else feel offended...if you're offended, it's your own fault.
KD in CA Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 Absolutely hysterical. Go Stevie. It reminded me of this classic moment:
Donald Duck Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 You need to give up this site. Negative Nancy. hey man, bombing anyone is no joke for me and I'm entitled to my own opinion Do you think our new HC is going to appreciate SJ giving the Pats more fuel for the fire?
Nanker Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 (edited) Now watch Goodell fine him $20k and suspend him for a game. And banish him to PPP. Edited April 4, 2013 by Nanker
GG Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 hey man, bombing anyone is no joke for me and I'm entitled to my own opinion Do you think our new HC is going to appreciate SJ giving the Pats more fuel for the fire? Yeah, like his tweet is going to make them reconsider "43 is the Mike"
NoSaint Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 hey man, bombing anyone is no joke for me and I'm entitled to my own opinion Do you think our new HC is going to appreciate SJ giving the Pats more fuel for the fire? its not even fuel to the fire, its just a dumb distraction. it wasnt particularly funny, it was just another "look at me" thing that probably wouldve been better left unsaid. not the end of the world, but you say something dumb publicly for attention, dont be surprised if the attention is negative.
hondo in seattle Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 It used to be that we could say certain jokes & comments in private and different (pc) things in public. Social media changes that in a sense because people often treat social media as if it's private and all too often what's said there becomes public. Social media by its very nature is more intimate, more "real," than a press conference. If we're sitting with a group of guys at a restaurant and one of them made the 'Nuke Foxboro' comment, it would be no big deal. We'd understand he was joking. Even if we didn't appreciate the humor, I don't think we'd condemn the guy. I don't think we should condemn Stevie for this. He's just having fun being Stevie.
NoSaint Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 It used to be that we could say certain jokes & comments in private and different (pc) things in public. Social media changes that in a sense because people often treat social media as if it's private and all too often what's said there becomes public. Social media by its very nature is more intimate, more "real," than a press conference. If we're sitting with a group of guys at a restaurant and one of them made the 'Nuke Foxboro' comment, it would be no big deal. We'd understand he was joking. Even if we didn't appreciate the humor, I don't think we'd condemn the guy. I don't think we should condemn Stevie for this. He's just having fun being Stevie. as a joke between friends, it wouldnt get a second look, but if he doesnt get that twitter is not joking between friends after all the negative attention its gotten him... then... if anything, hes probably loving having his name in the usa today and hoping he gets to field some interviews to "clear up the misunderstanding."
davspo Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 "Why so serious" "Happy New Years" why work out in the off season. making fun of war and bombing an American city. This is all fun and funny if you are winning. But Stevie you have proven to be a mediocre reciever an on a very poor team. How bout positng something that is not controversial and good for the team. How bout being a leader (you are certainly overcompensated for it). It will be interesting to see if Marrone actually has the testicals to deal with this jackass. Again, as long as this guy is on the team they will be under .500. And btw the tweet is a subtle admission that you (Stevie) feel that this team cannot beat the Pats- what a funny boy- "why so serious", because year after year we support this team and the team fails to deliver. So yes, you should be serious and you should understand that if you were on most other teams your behavior would not be tolerated. Seriously, what a loser this guy is.
Kelly the Dog Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 Seriously though, I hate nuclear bombs as much as the next guy. But, um, if you HAD to choose, Foxboro would really be a good place to start. Stevie's not advocating bombing Foxboro, he's just saying if we HAD to accept a nuclear bomb, and there was no way around it, why not there? Where it could do the world, and the country, and the NFL and the Bills the most good. I think we should be applauding his sensible, forward thinking.
davspo Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 Hey here's an idea, put the phone down stevie and go to the gym.
JPS Posted April 4, 2013 Posted April 4, 2013 (edited) If I were the Bills GM, I'd put a "no twitter" clause in every contract. It was truly a stupid comment that brings attention to #13 (again) for the wrong reasons. I could care less what he says, but THEY do care. Seriously though, I hate nuclear bombs as much as the next guy. But, um, if you HAD to choose, Foxboro would really be a good place to start. Stevie's not advocating bombing Foxboro, he's just saying if we HAD to accept a nuclear bomb, and there was no way around it, why not there? Where it could do the world, and the country, and the NFL and the Bills the most good. I think we should be applauding his sensible, forward thinking. Yikes. Sarcasm? I have a broken sarcasm meter since birth. Edited April 4, 2013 by JPS
Recommended Posts