3rdnlng Posted March 31, 2013 Posted March 31, 2013 http://washingtonexaminer.com/in-shift-medicare-would-pay-for-sex-change-operations/article/2525782 "For the first time since 1981, when it dubbed sex-change operations "experimental," Medicare has opened the door to covering transexual operations, adding to the growing list of operations that would be allowed under Obamacare. Acting on a new request, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said it is starting a new analysis that could lift the spending ban for sex-change operations with a goal of making a decision two days after Christmas and on the eve of Obamacare kicking in Jan. 1." What's next?
BringBackFergy Posted March 31, 2013 Posted March 31, 2013 http://washingtonexaminer.com/in-shift-medicare-would-pay-for-sex-change-operations/article/2525782 "For the first time since 1981, when it dubbed sex-change operations "experimental," Medicare has opened the door to covering transexual operations, adding to the growing list of operations that would be allowed under Obamacare. Acting on a new request, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said it is starting a new analysis that could lift the spending ban for sex-change operations with a goal of making a decision two days after Christmas and on the eve of Obamacare kicking in Jan. 1." What's next? But, but, but...they're entitled.
3rdnlng Posted March 31, 2013 Author Posted March 31, 2013 But, but, but...they're entitled. I think it has more to do with butt, butt, butt.
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2013 Posted March 31, 2013 http://washingtonexa...article/2525782 "For the first time since 1981, when it dubbed sex-change operations "experimental," Medicare has opened the door to covering transexual operations, adding to the growing list of operations that would be allowed under Obamacare. Acting on a new request, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said it is starting a new analysis that could lift the spending ban for sex-change operations with a goal of making a decision two days after Christmas and on the eve of Obamacare kicking in Jan. 1." What's next? What REALLY pisses me off about this is that my wife's niece couldn't even get treatment for a broken arm under Medicare.
4merper4mer Posted March 31, 2013 Posted March 31, 2013 I have as much or more respect for old people that anyone, but let's face it; they're gross. A sex change for an old person? Grosser. Paying for a sex change for an old person? Grossest.
Doc Posted March 31, 2013 Posted March 31, 2013 I have as much or more respect for old people that anyone, but let's face it; they're gross. A sex change for an old person? Grosser. Paying for a sex change for an old person? Grossest. I'm thinking it's for the people who are disabled by their sexual identity crisis, hence the reason they're on Medicare.
3rdnlng Posted March 31, 2013 Author Posted March 31, 2013 I have as much or more respect for old people that anyone, but let's face it; they're gross. A sex change for an old person? Grosser. Paying for a sex change for an old person? Grossest. Maybe they're also doing it under Medicaid for younger people.
Keukasmallies Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 Medicare officials and insurance companies are also considering the liposuction off-shoot - Takdafatotomy. The questions center on applicability to the DC fat cats. Film at 11:00!
B-Large Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 Word. I can finally become that woman I've always wanted to be, and I wanted to thank all of you for helping me make that happen... anybody want my dick? Won't be needing it anymore....
4merper4mer Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 Word. I can finally become that woman I've always wanted to be, and I wanted to thank all of you for helping me make that happen... anybody want my dick? Won't be needing it anymore.... Re-read the thread title. This is only good for adding. Not subtracting. That said you may want to consider an additional one as the first one does not appear to be working.
3rdnlng Posted April 1, 2013 Author Posted April 1, 2013 Re-read the thread title. This is only good for adding. Not subtracting. That said you may want to consider an additional one as the first one does not appear to be working. No, no, no. Read the article, not just the headline. There was not enough room to mention that lopadichtomys were also approved.
Magox Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 I have as much or more respect for old people that anyone, but let's face it; they're gross. A sex change for an old person? Grosser. Paying for a sex change for an old person? Grossest.
Jauronimo Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 Word. I can finally become that woman I've always wanted to be, and I wanted to thank all of you for helping me make that happen... anybody want my dick? Won't be needing it anymore.... Yes you will. They're going to turn it inside out and stuff it up inside you to make your new tiny vagina.
B-Large Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 Yes you will. They're going to turn it inside out and stuff it up inside you to make your new tiny vagina. that's disturbing. Your tallywacker becomes your vag..... wow
Magox Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 that's disturbing. Your tallywacker becomes your vag..... wow Think of it as a petunia.
Jauronimo Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 Think of it as a petunia. Exactly. Think of it as a petunia made out of fish and old mutilated penises.
Azalin Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 does mean that all of our underprivileged socialists can now be transformed into men?
Chef Jim Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 does mean that all of our underprivileged socialists can now be transformed into men? No I don't think so. We've only been talking about adding penises not testicles.
Azalin Posted April 1, 2013 Posted April 1, 2013 No I don't think so. We've only been talking about adding penises not testicles.
Recommended Posts