Jump to content

paul ryan says what he really means


Recommended Posts

It was the "ride any political whim" comment. Stuff like that isn't just old from the left. It's predictable.

 

uh...he will ride any political whim...as will a number of other politicians but yes...in fact..that is very true of Rubio

 

in fact to the extent anyone perceives his "camp" as separate from Jeb's...that is evidence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Lol........oh, the Irony

 

 

Bill Maher on California Income Taxes: 'Liberals - You Could Actually Lose Me'

 

Bill Maher made a comment Friday that his benefactor and hero Barack Obama should sit up and take notice of.

Speaking about the taxes the rich pay particularly in California, the host of HBO's Real Time said, "Liberals - you could actually lose me"

 

The panel discussion began with a conversation about the various budget proposals currently on the table in Washington.

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow predictably slammed Congressman Paul Ryan's (R-Wisc.) plan.

"The Ryan budget is a document that says the big problems in America right now are that rich people do not have enough money," she mocked. "They need relief from confiscatory tax rates."

"Well," Maher unsuccessfully tried to interrupt as Maddow continued. When she was finally done, he surprisingly pushed back.

Pointing at Virginia's former Republican Congressman Tom Davis, Maher said, "You know what? Rich people - I'm sure you'd agree with this - actually do pay the freight in this country."

"I just saw these statistics," he continued, "I mean, something like 70 percent. And here in California, I just want to say liberals - you could actually lose me. It's outrageous what we're paying - over 50 percent. I'm willing to pay my share, but yeah, it's ridiculous."

So it appears there is a point where Maher's money becomes more important than his politics.

Consider that in California, millionaires on top of the 39.6 percent they'll pay to the federal government in 2013, there's an additional 14.63 percent that now goes to the state.

Add in payroll taxes, local taxes, and property taxes, and I've seen estimates that the total tax bite could exceed 60 percent here.

But the rich aren't paying their "fair share."

Regardless, it sure was nice to see a liberal - especially one that contributed to Obama's reelection campaign! - complaining about his taxes.

 

 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/03/16/bill-maher-california-income-taxes-liberals-you-could-actually-lose-m#ixzz2Nimx59sT

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uh...he will ride any political whim...as will a number of other politicians but yes...in fact..that is very true of Rubio

 

in fact to the extent anyone perceives his "camp" as separate from Jeb's...that is evidence

 

The difference is that when it's a Republican, it's called "riding any political whim."

 

When it's a liberal, it's called "evolving."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol........oh, the Irony

 

 

Bill Maher on California Income Taxes: 'Liberals - You Could Actually Lose Me'

 

Bill Maher made a comment Friday that his benefactor and hero Barack Obama should sit up and take notice of.

Speaking about the taxes the rich pay particularly in California, the host of HBO's Real Time said, "Liberals - you could actually lose me"

 

The panel discussion began with a conversation about the various budget proposals currently on the table in Washington.

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow predictably slammed Congressman Paul Ryan's (R-Wisc.) plan.

"The Ryan budget is a document that says the big problems in America right now are that rich people do not have enough money," she mocked. "They need relief from confiscatory tax rates."

"Well," Maher unsuccessfully tried to interrupt as Maddow continued. When she was finally done, he surprisingly pushed back.

Pointing at Virginia's former Republican Congressman Tom Davis, Maher said, "You know what? Rich people - I'm sure you'd agree with this - actually do pay the freight in this country."

"I just saw these statistics," he continued, "I mean, something like 70 percent. And here in California, I just want to say liberals - you could actually lose me. It's outrageous what we're paying - over 50 percent. I'm willing to pay my share, but yeah, it's ridiculous."

So it appears there is a point where Maher's money becomes more important than his politics.

Consider that in California, millionaires on top of the 39.6 percent they'll pay to the federal government in 2013, there's an additional 14.63 percent that now goes to the state.

Add in payroll taxes, local taxes, and property taxes, and I've seen estimates that the total tax bite could exceed 60 percent here.

But the rich aren't paying their "fair share."

Regardless, it sure was nice to see a liberal - especially one that contributed to Obama's reelection campaign! - complaining about his taxes.

 

 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/03/16/bill-maher-california-income-taxes-liberals-you-could-actually-lose-m#ixzz2Nimx59sT

 

.

 

That's some funny ****

 

 

 

It was the "ride any political whim" comment. Stuff like that isn't just old from the left. It's predictable.

You don't understand LA, you see when SOB uses the word "child" when describing Rubio, he feels as if he got a good zinger off. Like "yeah! Child! ( that was a good one)"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol........oh, the Irony

 

 

Bill Maher on California Income Taxes: 'Liberals - You Could Actually Lose Me'

 

Bill Maher made a comment Friday that his benefactor and hero Barack Obama should sit up and take notice of.

Speaking about the taxes the rich pay particularly in California, the host of HBO's Real Time said, "Liberals - you could actually lose me"

 

The panel discussion began with a conversation about the various budget proposals currently on the table in Washington.

 

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow predictably slammed Congressman Paul Ryan's (R-Wisc.) plan.

 

"The Ryan budget is a document that says the big problems in America right now are that rich people do not have enough money," she mocked. "They need relief from confiscatory tax rates."

 

"Well," Maher unsuccessfully tried to interrupt as Maddow continued. When she was finally done, he surprisingly pushed back.

 

Pointing at Virginia's former Republican Congressman Tom Davis, Maher said, "You know what? Rich people - I'm sure you'd agree with this - actually do pay the freight in this country."

 

"I just saw these statistics," he continued, "I mean, something like 70 percent. And here in California, I just want to say liberals - you could actually lose me. It's outrageous what we're paying - over 50 percent. I'm willing to pay my share, but yeah, it's ridiculous."

 

So it appears there is a point where Maher's money becomes more important than his politics.

 

Consider that in California, millionaires on top of the 39.6 percent they'll pay to the federal government in 2013, there's an additional 14.63 percent that now goes to the state.

 

Add in payroll taxes, local taxes, and property taxes, and I've seen estimates that the total tax bite could exceed 60 percent here.

 

But the rich aren't paying their "fair share."

 

Regardless, it sure was nice to see a liberal - especially one that contributed to Obama's reelection campaign! - complaining about his taxes.

 

 

 

 

http://newsbusters.o...m#ixzz2Nimx59sT

 

 

.

do you cons actually imagine us libs enjoy paying high taxes any more than you do?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

do you cons actually imagine us libs enjoy paying high taxes any more than you do?

 

Yeah, actually. You get to be all high-and-mighty pretending you're helping people, PLUS you get to wallow in the "heroic victim" mentality. Fact is, if it weren't for perceived martyrdom, you wouldn't have anything at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Whether you agree with his ideas or not, here is a courageous, serious man who actually puts out a specific, budget plan.

 

 

well, that's not right. if you agree with his ideas, then yes, you would regard him to be courageous.

if you disagree with him, you wouldn't.

paul ryan is a divisive figure, which means there are going to be some people who agree with him, and then there will be some who don't.

 

as for whether he's serious, well, i hope he is. otherwise, there are those who would accuse his budget plan as being political farce.

 

jw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly. I'm continually amazed at how few people understand our current reality. Doing the same stupid **** over and over isn't progressive. Progressive? :lol:

 

It's as if our country rents its furniture, including a big screen tv for every room and then pays for it with payday loans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, that's not right. if you agree with his ideas, then yes, you would regard him to be courageous.

if you disagree with him, you wouldn't.

paul ryan is a divisive figure, which means there are going to be some people who agree with him, and then there will be some who don't.

 

as for whether he's serious, well, i hope he is. otherwise, there are those who would accuse his budget plan as being political farce.

 

jw

 

Posting while impaired is not a good thing jw. Otherwise how do you explain your bolded statement.

 

Being courageous has NOTHING to do with people agreeing or disagreeing with you, but (if anything) it does take more fortitude when you know people are going to demonize you for your proposals.

 

 

 

"We must have the courage to do what is morally right" - Ronald Reagan

 

"Courage is grace under pressure" - Ernest Hemmingway

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posting while impaired is not a good thing jw. Otherwise how do you explain your bolded statement.

 

Being courageous has NOTHING to do with people agreeing or disagreeing with you, but (if anything) it does take more fortitude when you know people are going to demonize you for your proposals.

 

 

 

"We must have the courage to do what is morally right" - Ronald Reagan

 

"Courage is grace under pressure" - Ernest Hemmingway

 

 

.

 

sorry, missed his gracefulness.

 

jw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, that's not right. if you agree with his ideas, then yes, you would regard him to be courageous.

if you disagree with him, you wouldn't.

paul ryan is a divisive figure, which means there are going to be some people who agree with him, and then there will be some who don't.

 

as for whether he's serious, well, i hope he is. otherwise, there are those who would accuse his budget plan as being political farce.

 

jw

 

I continue to be amazed that you have one politician who's done the actual math in proposing his budget, and he's called divisive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Posting while impaired is not a good thing jw. Otherwise how do you explain your bolded statement.

 

Being courageous has NOTHING to do with people agreeing or disagreeing with you, but (if anything) it does take more fortitude when you know people are going to demonize you for your proposals.

 

 

 

"We must have the courage to do what is morally right" - Ronald Reagan

 

"Courage is grace under pressure" - Ernest Hemmingway

 

 

.

What, are you kidding? Wawrow never posts unless it's ~3:30 am, and he just left the bar.

 

And, stop laying the blame for Wawrow's silliness on alcohol. Alcohol doesn't account for the fact that Wawrow doesn't know basic economics, or refuses to recognize simple truths like "Medicare must be reformed".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

What, are you kidding? Wawrow never posts unless it's ~3:30 am, and he just left the bar.

 

And, stop laying the blame for Wawrow's silliness on alcohol. Alcohol doesn't account for the fact that Wawrow doesn't know basic economics, or refuses to recognize simple truths like "Medicare must be reformed".

 

yep?

 

that said, which finger you figure i'm holding up, doc oc?

 

jw

Edited by john wawrow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Wawrow is there anything more vapid than searching your own name - for shame who do you think you are OC?

HA!

 

...lybob with a shot.

 

I was just thinking the same thing = "what the hell are all these old threads doing up here, and why do they all have wawrow, either posting or being referenced in them?"

 

I was about to start a thread, but, I see ...lybob, of all people, has beaten me to it.

 

And, WTF? I don't use the search function on this board at all. On the football board? That is a different story. Why...should be obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...