dayman Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2138012-1,00.html Article on why logical reasoning says we aught to just build it.
meazza Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 http://www.time.com/...38012-1,00.html Article on why logical reasoning says we aught to just build it. Yes.... yes, buy our dirty oil (in an evil Canadian voice)
frostbitmic Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 If they really want it, why don't the oil conglomerates build it ? Its not like they aren't making record profits or anything. Or are they just looking for more corporate welfare ?
meazza Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 (edited) If they really want it, why don't the oil conglomerates build it ? Its not like they aren't making record profits or anything. Or are they just looking for more corporate welfare ? Umm the pipeline is to be built by TransCanada corporation. They haven`t received the approval from the White House to build it you moron unless you classify a Canadian company corporate welfare? Edited March 10, 2013 by meazza
....lybob Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 http://www.time.com/...38012-1,00.html Article on why logical reasoning says we aught to just build it. Why on earth would any American not directly profiting want to move thick ,corrosive, heavy metal laden sludge across the ogallala aquifer so two Koch owned refineries can more profitably produce petroleum products for Caribbean and other Latin American markets- Why don't we let the Canadians refine the toxic sludge and pipe/ship the refined products to the North and North East, making the Canadians more money per barrel and perhaps having the effect of lowering gas and home heating oil prices in the North, North East of America.
Magox Posted March 10, 2013 Posted March 10, 2013 Of course it makes a lot of sense to build it, it's a no-brainer. Especially now that the elections are over and the big O already got his money from the ultra 1%er enviro's
B-Man Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 If they really want it, why don't the oil conglomerates build it ? Its not like they aren't making record profits or anything. Or are they just looking for more corporate welfare ? Why on earth would any American not directly profiting want to move thick ,corrosive, heavy metal laden sludge across the ogallala aquifer so two Koch owned refineries can more profitably produce petroleum products for Caribbean and other Latin American markets- Why don't we let the Canadians refine the toxic sludge and pipe/ship the refined products to the North and North East, making the Canadians more money per barrel and perhaps having the effect of lowering gas and home heating oil prices in the North, North East of America. I specifically stuck with images for answers, because those responses were so cliched and simplistic, I wasn't sure if the posters would grasp anything else. .
IDBillzFan Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 Of course it makes a lot of sense to build it, it's a no-brainer. Especially now that the elections are over and the big O already got his money from the ultra 1%er enviro's I would add that if Obama is ready to move on the Keystone pipeline it's also because Immelt is finally satisfied with getting his fair share of US money filtered to his operations in Brazil.
B-Man Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 There's no point in building it........didn't the intelligentsia warn us back in 2007 that it would take 5 - 7 years before we would see results ? ......oh wait. Roll Call: The Keystone XL Pipeline Has Been Under Review For More Than Twice As Long As It Would Have Taken To Build It. Popular Mechanics: The Environmental Dangers of Not Building Keystone XL. Wash. Examiner: Obama caught between friends in fight over Keystone XL pipeline. Reason: 3 Reasons to Build the Keystone XL Pipeline. .
Jim in Anchorage Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 Why on earth would any American not directly profiting want to move thick ,corrosive, heavy metal laden sludge across the ogallala aquifer so two Koch owned refineries can more profitably produce petroleum products for Caribbean and other Latin American markets- Why don't we let the Canadians refine the toxic sludge and pipe/ship the refined products to the North and North East, making the Canadians more money per barrel and perhaps having the effect of lowering gas and home heating oil prices in the North, North East of America. I have seen some fantastically ignorant post's from you, but this one is the pinnacle of stupidity. Now go back to studying Alaska rape statistics.
3rdnlng Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 I have seen some fantastically ignorant post's from you, but this one is the pinnacle of stupidity. Now go back to studying Alaska rape statistics. I'm ahead of you in line. I'm still waiting for him to source his cute graphs depicting how Hugo Chavez was a savoir to his people.
Bronc24 Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 Why on earth would any American not directly profiting want to move thick ,corrosive, heavy metal laden sludge across the ogallala aquifer so two Koch owned refineries can more profitably produce petroleum products for Caribbean and other Latin American markets- Why don't we let the Canadians refine the toxic sludge and pipe/ship the refined products to the North and North East, making the Canadians more money per barrel and perhaps having the effect of lowering gas and home heating oil prices in the North, North East of America. You're right. Depending on Middle East oil makes way more sense. Dumbass.
....lybob Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 You're right. Depending on Middle East oil makes way more sense. Dumbass. First of all how is getting refined petroleum products from Canada instead of unrefined petroleum products "Depending on middle East Oil" second of all we get 12.9% of our oil from the Persian Gulf - 9% of it from Saudi Arabia who next to Israel and Britain might be our closest ally - you are quite uninformed, try reading something other than hockey scores.
RkFast Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 First of all how is getting refined petroleum products from Canada instead of unrefined petroleum products "Depending on middle East Oil" second of all we get 12.9% of our oil from the Persian Gulf - 9% of it from Saudi Arabia who next to Israel and Britain might be our closest ally - you are quite uninformed, try reading something other than hockey scores. Ive spoken to people who actually WORK in the petrochem business and on the finance side and they have said without a doubt the Keystone pipeline would be a huge help to the US energy picture. But please. Continue.
dayman Posted March 11, 2013 Author Posted March 11, 2013 Ive spoken to people who actually WORK in the petrochem business and on the finance side and they have said without a doubt the Keystone pipeline would be a huge help to the US energy picture. But please. Continue. Lets not get ahead of ourselves the opposite ways now.
Bronc24 Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 First of all how is getting refined petroleum products from Canada instead of unrefined petroleum products "Depending on middle East Oil" second of all we get 12.9% of our oil from the Persian Gulf - 9% of it from Saudi Arabia who next to Israel and Britain might be our closest ally - you are quite uninformed, try reading something other than hockey scores. I find it amusing you choose to omit Canada from your list of close allies. It pretty much affirms my "dumbass" comment. Secondly, your love of all things Saudi is pretty damn naive, but I suppose that naivity is why you voted Obama in the first place. Your little "hockey" comment is also rather amusing. However, being a left-wing idiot lends itself to pigeon-holing without any basis in fact, so I certainly understand you have cerebral limitations. But hey, there's always "Hope", "Change" and "Forward" to fall back on as your economy spirals down the toilet.
meazza Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 I find it amusing you choose to omit Canada from your list of close allies. Ever since Darth Harper took office, most likely.
....lybob Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 I find it amusing you choose to omit Canada from your list of close allies. It pretty much affirms my "dumbass" comment. Secondly, your love of all things Saudi is pretty damn naive, but I suppose that naivity is why you voted Obama in the first place. Your little "hockey" comment is also rather amusing. However, being a left-wing idiot lends itself to pigeon-holing without any basis in fact, so I certainly understand you have cerebral limitations. But hey, there's always "Hope", "Change" and "Forward" to fall back on as your economy spirals down the toilet. Canada is our B word not an ally
Bronc24 Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Canada is our B word not an ally Now that's the pot calling the kettle black.
....lybob Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Now that's the pot calling the kettle black. no that was calling a spade a spade, nice try though and thanks for playing
Recommended Posts