Jump to content

TBD Vote: RB


Numark

TBD Vote: RB  

141 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you currently rate our starting RB Situation?

  2. 2. How do you currently rate our depth at RB?



Recommended Posts

So let's do something a little fun gang. I'm going to create a topic (every day or so) for each position until free agency. As a community we can rate how well off we feel the Bills are at the position. Then we can do this after free agency, and then we can do this after the draft. This way we can see where our holes really are at, what we need to address, and to see if the bills address these needs. Please be rational/honest with your voting. Also please post as well as vote, that way we can say I told you so in a few months!

 

 

 

Current Situation

Please feel free to correct me if you feel I have made a mistake here. This is based on what I believe would be the starters/backups if the season started today.

 

 

Starter: CJ Spiller

Depth: Fred Jackson

 

 

 

 

Previous Polls (Please vote in these polls if you have not done so already, they are still open!): QB |

Edited by Numark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to know who the heck thinks Fred is an "Average" backup... we've all seen what he can do, i'm not even going to list it. For this year and next, he's one of the top backups in football. Beyond that I think age hits him, but for now we're set here (still need a 3rd guy for developing and to take over for fred in a year or 2 though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt the coaching staff views Fred as CJ's back up. CJ will be the focal point, but I imagine they'll view it more as a tandem.

 

Please not this again.

 

This isn't pee wee football where we make everyone happy. CJ is clearly the better player, feed him, use Fred to pass protect and goal line situations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please not this again.

 

This isn't pee wee football where we make everyone happy. CJ is clearly the better player, feed him, use Fred to pass protect and goal line situations

Please, not this again. You really didn't contradict anything I said, but seemed to take a contradictory tone, so I'm not sure what your point is, or if you even have one.

 

This is the NFL, not Madden. Anyone who watched the games last year (or even looked at the stat sheet for that matter) knows CJ plays better when he's part of a tandem. They also understand that CJ's style of running, while explosive, is not conducive to running all the types of plays the coach wants to run. It takes a special kind of simplicity to think otherwise.

 

I would still use Fred up the middle, not necessarily in short yardage situations, because it keeps the defense honest, opens up opportunities for CJ, and keeps 2nd and 3rd down manageable..

Edited by Rob's House
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please, not this again. You really didn't contradict anything I said, but seemed to take a contradictory tone, so I'm not sure what your point is, or if you even have one.

 

This is the NFL, not Madden. Anyone who watched the games last year (or even looked at the stat sheet for that matter) knows CJ plays better when he's part of a tandem. They also understand that CJ's style of running, while explosive, is not conducive to running all the types of plays the coach wants to run. It takes a special kind of simplicity to think otherwise.

 

I would still use Fred up the middle, not necessarily in short yardage situations, because it keeps the defense honest, opens up opportunities for CJ, and keeps 2nd and 3rd down manageable..

thanks for clearing that up, i thought this was madden

 

my point was younsaid they would be a tandem. My opinion is when it comes to touches there should be a CLEAR #1 and #2. CJ should be at 20ish and fred at 5ish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for clearing that up, i thought this was madden

 

my point was younsaid they would be a tandem. My opinion is when it comes to touches there should be a CLEAR #1 and #2. CJ should be at 20ish and fred at 5ish

And you're welcome to your opinion. In my opinion it's silly to try to manage a game by counting carries rather than letting the situation dictate the play, but again, that's my opinion. I said in the first post that CJ should be the focal point, but I suppose you missed that part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern is that the Bills need to add another RB in the draft. I would love Lattimore if he is available in round 3 or later. Freddy is a great player, but I assume has about 1-2 years left. Also, if Fred gets injured, we have no other RB option available as a backup to Spiller. We could possibly pick up Mendenhall in FA, but he's not much of an upgrade over Choice. Sometimes the injury bug hits the RB position on a team, and we seem to be hurting in the depth department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like both our guys. But I'm not convinced CJ is good enough all around to carry a team (grinding out short yards, etc), and I'm not convinced Fred has anything left in the tank. We need another RB, nothing splashy, but a guy who can reliably get a few yards when needed. Then I'll be content.

 

Which two morons view the starting RB situation as "average?" Yes, I said morons.

I only voted for "above average" because CJ hasn't proven he can get tough yards yet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i said average for depth. That was the question right? Fred to me when healthy is above average. But there have been questions about his health lately, and then who do we have after that? So that was my line of thinking for the depth vote. CJ is definatly above average. I will go to good if he can repeat what he was able to do last year and stay healthy.

 

I'd like to know who the heck thinks Fred is an "Average" backup... we've all seen what he can do, i'm not even going to list it. For this year and next, he's one of the top backups in football. Beyond that I think age hits him, but for now we're set here (still need a 3rd guy for developing and to take over for fred in a year or 2 though)

i voted average for the 2nd poll. But the poll wasn't about the back up, it was about depth. who do we have after fred? That is the definition of depth is it not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which two morons view the starting RB situation as "average?" Yes, I said morons.

 

Some would call poster moron if they can not figure out how to use view buttons to see voters.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion even if they think CJ is not an every down back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some would call poster moron if they can not figure out how to use view buttons to see voters.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion even if they think CJ is not an every down back.

 

Yes, some would -- thanks for the tip.

 

I'll stand behind my comments. Anyone who doesn't believe the Bills' "starting RB situation" is better than "average" is a moron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...