Hotpockets28 Posted February 23, 2013 Posted February 23, 2013 Fitz sucks this is true.....but weeden and mCcoy are far beyond worse...both a trash ...isnt weeden like the same age of fitz and he is just entering his second season
CarolinaBill Posted February 23, 2013 Posted February 23, 2013 Id roll with Mccoy for the league minimum, he's a good fit for the spread-WCO hybrid that Marrone/Hackett will be implementing.
T master Posted February 23, 2013 Posted February 23, 2013 You know it's a dark time when I want a qb from Cleveland Well they did have um - ah - well - um - that Bernie guy ??
Captain Hindsight Posted February 23, 2013 Posted February 23, 2013 Between the two I'd take Weeden, but if thats my best option im very worried
Johnny Hammersticks Posted February 23, 2013 Posted February 23, 2013 I'm not sure why many on here are turning their noses up at Brandon Weeden. If you watched any Browns football last year (I did...had T-Rich as my fantasy RB1), you would know that he actually played pretty well in an offense that had ZERO weapons and ran the ball the majority of the time. IMO...he would be a major upgrade over Fitz. Last I heard, the Browns were open to hearing offers for Weeden, no way in hell the release him. That said...given all the needs on this team, I don't think the Bills are in a position to give away draft picks for anyone.
JPS Posted February 23, 2013 Posted February 23, 2013 Id roll with Mccoy for the league minimum, he's a good fit for the spread-WCO hybrid that Marrone/Hackett will be implementing. all day
CSBill Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 You know it's a dark time when I want a qb from Cleveland Exactly, which is why I don't!
DPR4444 Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Well they did have um - ah - well - um - that Bernie guy ?? Brian Sipe Otto Graham uh... not much else
Bronc24 Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Brian Sipe Otto Graham uh... not much else Weekend at Bernie's! Plus, his daughter does porn. But really, have we sunk to the level of contemplating which crappy Browns' QB we want? Yeesh.
jjmac Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 You want either of these? I think both could be resurrected in another scheme/team Weeden-too old to start over. McCoy-somewhat overrated and too little arm strength for Buffalo in winter. No, thank you.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 I'm not sure why many on here are turning their noses up at Brandon Weeden. If you watched any Browns football last year (I did...had T-Rich as my fantasy RB1), you would know that he actually played pretty well in an offense that had ZERO weapons and ran the ball the majority of the time. IMO...he would be a major upgrade over Fitz. Last I heard, the Browns were open to hearing offers for Weeden, no way in hell the release him. That said...given all the needs on this team, I don't think the Bills are in a position to give away draft picks for anyone. exactly although I would consider 3rd or lower draft picks but they wouldn't take that so unless he gets cut it probably wont happen.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Weeden-too old to start over. McCoy-somewhat overrated and too little arm strength for Buffalo in winter. No, thank you. Really? Would getting Flacco or Alex Smith be to old for them to start over? He's not that old, he could play till 40 which would give us 11 years of Starting QB play. Jim Kelly was 26 when he "started over" here, Weeden's age is a non issue.
reddogblitz Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Weeden-too old to start Roger Staubach was 27 when he came to the Cowboys after serving in the Navy for 4 years. I think McCoy could be good in the right place. I think weeden's got game. I'd be happy if we got either one of these guys.
jjmac Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Really? Would getting Flacco or Alex Smith be to old for them to start over? He's not that old, he could play till 40 which would give us 11 years of Starting QB play. Jim Kelly was 26 when he "started over" here, Weeden's age is a non issue. Roger Staubach was 27 when he came to the Cowboys after serving in the Navy for 4 years. I think McCoy could be good in the right place. I think weeden's got game. I'd be happy if we got either one of these guys. I think 29 is too old for a QB to develop into a franchise guy...and Weeden shows no signs of becoming one. McCoy was way too overrated coming out of Texas. I'm sure the thoughts of him being good in the right place are echoes of was thought concerning more than one of the QBs trying to succeed Jim Kelly.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Regime change aside, I don't see the Browns releasing Weeden.
peterpan Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Weeden actually had a very good year. Its unfortunate he is going into his 2nd year and the same age as Rodgers...but there is no way he gets cut.
ny33 Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 You want either of these? I think both could be resurrected in another scheme/team Care to provide any evidence for the ridiculous, unsupported statement that Cleveland is considering cutting Weeden?
Big Gun Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 You want either of these? I think both could be resurrected in another scheme/team I think McCoy is the goner and no I wouldn't want him.
Recommended Posts