dhg Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I rather sign danny amendola for more years and for less money....younger and faster...a upincoming welker clone I would prefer that too, but that guy just can't seem to stay healthy.
buffalobillsgrl Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Personally I would pass........we have WRs like him......what we don't have is a big fast outside WR and welker isn't that
Captain Hindsight Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 People say no to a guy that has destroyed defenses for years despite them knowing exactly whats coming
jcbillsfan Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Nelson...or C. Patterson in draft? if Patterson is the real deal that would be awesome
buffalobillsgrl Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 People say no to a guy that has destroyed defenses for years despite them knowing exactly whats coming I think he goes into the I wouldn't be upset if we did.........but he isn't really the type of WR we need category. I wouldn't want them to give him a huge multi year contract either....that would upset me
Buffalo Barbarian Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Personally I would pass........we have WRs like him......what we don't have is a big fast outside WR and welker isn't that we don't have anybody even close to Welkers shiftiness or abilities. His only downside is age and past injuries. if Patterson is the real deal that would be awesome Patterson is the real deal but he is very raw and need to work on his hands but his explosiveness and size would ideal for what we need.
Meathead Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 only if they also sign the girl and the two midgets
buffalobillsgrl Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 we don't have anybody even close to Welkers shiftiness or abilities. His only downside is age and past injuries. Patterson is the real deal but he is very raw and need to work on his hands but his explosiveness and size would ideal for what we need. Actually I think we do.........he is a slot receiver I think putting stevie in the slot he could be better than welker..............if we get a great consistant QB......we need a big physical outside receiver and welker is not that
San Jose Bills Fan Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I would prefer that too, but that guy just can't seem to stay healthy. Thanks you about Amendola. He's become very popular here over the last little while but few of his proponents bother to mention that he's only played in 12 games combined (1 + 11) over the last two years. It would be a big gamble giving big money to a guy who seemingly can't stay healthy.
Pondslider Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) well.....if your sticking with Fitzpatrick.......then Welker is EXACTLY the kind of receiver you need. Fitzpatrick is not accurate enough for Welker. Part of Welker's success is getting the ball where he needs it either in stride or where he can make a quick move and get upfield. Fitzpatrick is not good at that. Paying a lot for old beat up Welker when the Patriots don't want him is a bad idea. Edited February 18, 2013 by Pondslider
HansLanda Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 The only way I'd 100% sign up for Wes is if he continued his "foot, feet and toe" gimmick during all press conferences after playing Rex.
Max997 Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 (edited) I don't think we have the cash to do it. What makes you think they don't have the cash to do it? Not saying they should but Bills have plenty of space under the cap and can always create more Edited February 18, 2013 by Max997
ChuTheFat Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I would prefer that too, but that guy just can't seem to stay healthy. http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/2964/wes-welker Stats seem to indicate that in 9 years of being in the league, he's missed a grand total of 5 games. If he is continually injured like people seem to think, then please send more of this type of oft-injured player to the Bills.
T master Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 I think he would be to expensive for us but i can see St. Louis ,Broncos, Jags, KC, San Diego going for him.
Astrobot Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Pats have NO draft picks in RD 4, 5, 6 this year. They have 2 RD7's. Can they still cheat somehow?
San Jose Bills Fan Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 http://www.rotoworld...2964/wes-welker Stats seem to indicate that in 9 years of being in the league, he's missed a grand total of 5 games. If he is continually injured like people seem to think, then please send more of this type of oft-injured player to the Bills. dhg was talking about Amendola, not Welker. That's why I seconded him about Amendola playing in only 12 games over the past two years.
first_and_ten Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 Why isn't anyone questioning if Brady might start to decline? He will be 36 when the season starts. He didn't look great against Baltimore either.
missthe kgun Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 We will draft a WR...Welker will go to the Panthers or the Rams
BringBackFergy Posted February 18, 2013 Posted February 18, 2013 What makes you think they don't have the cash to do it? Not saying they should but Bills have plenty of space under the cap and can always create more After signing Byrd, Levitre and our draft picks - not sure there is sufficient cap space to spend $9-10 million on Welker. The article I read (refer to the Stadium Wall) said we might have some room left on cap money but why blow your wad on one guy when you could conceivably get 2 or 3 at a position of greater need (LB or safety)
Recommended Posts