Thurmal34 Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 So this rumor gets floated at the same time the Fitz asked to restructure rumor comes out. Color me cynical.
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 I wanna see that "reliabilty meter" with Soprano and nevergiveup and the others on it again. Clayton has got to be in the teens.
Nitro Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Pass on stop gap measures. Bills have been doing this for way too long.
Solomon Grundy Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 I strongly agree. Even if they keep Levitre I do not know if they are really an above average OL. I am also not going to accept the line of thought that Cordy Glenn is going to be a good left tackle until he proves it. He is a big, soft bodied guy who had somewhat of a reputation as not being a self-starter, so he still has a lot of proving to do. I really would rather see him on the right side with an athlete like Joeckel on the left. Speaking of the right side, the ROT was a problem last year. Mainly because of injuries, which happens to be a problem with this line. They aren't one of those lines that is going to start every game together. Eric "Balsa" Wood being almost a certainty to suffer some sort of injury. Pears, Urbik, Reinhardt, Colin Brown.....these guys all missed time. I've been saying in other threads that we need to improve the Oline. Either take Fisher/Joeckel at 8 or move down and take Lane Johnson. Where have you heard that? Check many of the various threads concerning Bills upcoming draft.
CarolinaBill Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Well, if Goodell doesn't dissuade Vick from Coming to Buffalo AGAIN, then this may be a viable short term solution. There are some moving parts involved, like our ability to resign Levitre. But if that were to happen, and we got Vick, on a team friendly restructured deal, it could be a perfect way to transition to a young QB. As someone astutely pointed out earlier, Vick has not been able to stay healthy, EVER, so the chances of him doing so now are slim and none. With our OLINE intact, CJ and stevie, plus whoever we bring in, Vick could thrive for a 8-14 games, and when he eventually does get hurt, the rookie gets his shot. Its almost a win-win scenario, if everything were working in our favor.
benderbender Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Nothing wrong with bringing in a semi-competent QB who will make the opponents game plan harder while we groom a rookie QB
AtlantaStampede Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 I could be wrong, but didn't the Eagles try to make Vick into a pocket type passer? Biggest problem in Philly was the line. Give Vick a good line, a great running game, and under Marone's system - high paced, kelly gun offense. I think it would interesting. A guy like Vick seems to be a better fit for that style than Fitz does. IMO.
Jim in Anchorage Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Been a Bills fan since 1972. Only team I ever cared about. If they hire Vick I will watch them for one reason only, to root against them.
Mr. WEO Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 (edited) Never thought of it that way but that would be spot on! Vick has a cannon, but accuracy is not his best attribute, and after taking a few shots he looks scared n runnnig for his life. This was mostly because the Eagles O-line was terrible. I do think that B-lo's line is far better than the eagles. Vick could play better here? I just dont see briging him in when Fitz will give the same amount of wins or more!(This is just my opinion) If they plan on runnng the read option, then Vick would be better suited, and this is the only reason i see him playing in B-lo other wise its another year of Fitz. Who knows Fitz may do better with an O that ran first and depended on his "arm" less. All in all, it really depends on what our new coaching staff wants to run! Vick could never run a read option offense. He's too dumb. He had a decent O-line in '11 and he crapped out then too. He's just not smart enough to play today's game. Every play where he can't find his primary receiver immediately is a busted play. He can't even outrun anyone anymore. Vicksters are delusional. His career is what it is. Only one season with over 8 wins. And that was before he fell apart. Why on earth would this be the guy anyone would want. "Fitz sucks. Let's bring in.....Mike Vick"??! Insanity. Edited February 9, 2013 by Mr. WEO
Tipster19 Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=31g0YE61PLQ That was hysterical! Lol! Nice job Jay, that was good stuff!
KRT88 Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Why, seriously, why? He's old, he's much slower than a he used to be. He's inaccurate, he can't stay healthy. What positive qualities are they looking at? But come on Clayton lives in his mom's basement....
Keukasmallies Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Great idea! Let's hop on that has-been train one more time. The Bills have been so successful in the past; we can certainly afford another reclamation project.
Nanker Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Talk about being conflicted. That would be the fan base if they did get him and The Bills became relevant again with Ron Mexico being the face of the team. Say what you will about his rehab, and I'm glad for him that he went through all the steps. But that's the kind of thing that cuts too deep for a lot of people. It won't allow them to put that crap aside mentally and cheer for him as the leader of the team they're emotionally tied to. That said, he's old, beat up, and wants a ton of cash and to be the starter. He could just stay in Philly, take less money than his current contract, and be the temporary solution while they groom a young guy. If he's not interested in doing that for the Iggles, what makes anyone think he'd uproot his family (he just bought a big house - no pun intended - in NJ, is married to a successful Philadelphia business woman) and move to B'lo for Fitz money? Any suitor will have to pony up some serious cash to get him to move, especially if they're offering essentially the same deal as he could get by staying put.
stinky finger Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 There is no "aside" for that! If that's our plan, which I doubt, I'd rather go 0-16 than give him a job. You own a puppy?
3rdand12 Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Nothing wrong with bringing in a semi-competent QB who will make the opponents game plan harder while we groom a rookie QB yes , i think there is alot wrong with that. Vick a mentor ? Bringing him in would be messy at best. restructure Fitz or bring in a viable starter who is not a stopgap. imro. Vick is done producing
jcbillsfan Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 I hate the dog thing. Makes me sick to say this but if its him or fitz ,I will take Vick
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 I hate the dog thing. Makes me sick to say this but if its him or fitz ,I will take Vick Punch in stomach or groin?
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 9, 2013 Posted February 9, 2013 Punch in stomach or groin? Analogy for your choices between Vick and Fitz.
Recommended Posts