1billsfan Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Saying is he's not even close to being a Hall of Famer. Hey fatheads, he led (understatement) a team to 4 Superbowls in a row. Next question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Saying is he's not even close to being a Hall of Famer. Hey fatheads, he led (understatement) a team to 4 Superbowls in a row. Next question. 196314[/snapback] Call in and tell them Parcells is Gay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Saying is he's not even close to being a Hall of Famer. Hey fatheads, he led (understatement) a team to 4 Superbowls in a row. Next question. 196314[/snapback] How can someone be "not even close" to being a Hall of Famer when they're in the friggin' Hall of Fame????? Morons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 I guess they should have voted differently. Oh yeah, they didn't have a vote. Too bad that a couple of blowhards who are definitely in the middle of the pack in their own profession don't recognize the irony of criticizing someone already in the HOF for theirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 I guess they should have voted differently. Oh yeah, they didn't have a vote. Too bad that a couple of blowhards who are definitely in the middle of the pack in their own profession don't recognize the irony of criticizing someone already in the HOF for theirs. 196331[/snapback] Why they after Jimbo? Did Chad Pennington B word slap them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted January 6, 2005 Author Share Posted January 6, 2005 I guess they should have voted differently. Oh yeah, they didn't have a vote. Too bad that a couple of blowhards who are definitely in the middle of the pack in their own profession don't recognize the irony of criticizing someone already in the HOF for theirs. 196331[/snapback] They equated Kelly's career with Phil Simms (that since Kelly is in then Simms should be) and said that Jim's a tad better than Warren Moon (now there's a big WTF)! They are making themselves look very ridiculous today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mile High Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Why they after Jimbo? Did Chad Pennington B word slap them? 196336[/snapback] That's what I was thinking. What the hell is their problem? What's the discussion about anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted January 6, 2005 Author Share Posted January 6, 2005 That's what I was thinking. What the hell is their problem? What's the discussion about anyway? 196348[/snapback] The morning guys (who think he's without question a HOFer) had Kelly on in the AM and after the interview started getting on Mike and the Mad Dog (afternoon guys) for suggesting he's no HOFer. So these knuckleheads took the bait and continued the topic by trashing Kelly's career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Call in and tell them Parcells is Gay. 196319[/snapback] Mark VI, are you actually Jeremy Shockey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweet baboo Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 they can trash all they want...kelly's not only in the hall of fame, he got in with his first eligibility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Mark VI, are you actually Jeremy Shockey? 196357[/snapback] Busted ! Fat Mike preaching his outright love for Parcells is sickening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 They equated Kelly's career with Phil Simms (that since Kelly is in then Simms should be) and said that Jim's a tad better than Warren Moon (now there's a big WTF)! They are making themselves look very ridiculous today. 196347[/snapback] I would equate Marino & Fouts with Warren Moon, as they would never win big games. Jimbo won a lot of big games, though unfortunately not the biggest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmac17 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 i have to think the only reason they hate him is because of phil simms not being in the hall. generally I like mike and the mad dog, it is good radio. idiots yes, but entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Busted ! Fat Mike preaching his outright love for Parcells is sickening. 196365[/snapback] Call in and tell them Parcells couldn't win without Belichick......Belichick wins w/o Parcells. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Call in and tell them Parcells couldn't win without Belichick......Belichick wins w/o Parcells. 196376[/snapback] Classic!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 i have to think the only reason they hate him is because of phil simms not being in the hall. generally I like mike and the mad dog, it is good radio. idiots yes, but entertaining. 196374[/snapback] Phil Simms wasn't half the quarterback Kelly was. I don't recall Simms ever taking over a game himself. Giants won with Defense and smash mouth offense, not Simm's arm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Saying is he's not even close to being a Hall of Famer. Hey fatheads, he led (understatement) a team to 4 Superbowls in a row. Next question. 196314[/snapback] Who are Mike & the Maddog? Never heard of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Phil Simms wasn't half the quarterback Kelly was.I don't recall Simms ever taking over a game himself. Giants won with Defense and smash mouth offense, not Simm's arm. 196379[/snapback] Simms was a very good QB, I wouldnt sell him short because of what they say about Kelly. For whatever reason they dont like Kelly, so be it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted January 6, 2005 Author Share Posted January 6, 2005 Who are Mike & the Maddog? Never heard of them. 196382[/snapback] They are the two top sportstalk guys in NYC. The station can be heard in NY, NJ, CN even parts of PA. Huge listener base. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 6, 2005 Share Posted January 6, 2005 Phil Simms wasn't half the quarterback Kelly was.I don't recall Simms ever taking over a game himself. Giants won with Defense and smash mouth offense, not Simm's arm. 196379[/snapback] Simms never played in an offense suited to HIS attributes. They never had outstanding outside receivers. He was VERY good an would have put up ridiculous numbers if he had Jerry Rice and John Taylor in San Francisco instead of Odessa Turner and Steven Baker in New Jersey. As for not taking over a game, 22-25 for 268 yards and 3 TDs in the Super Bowl? The Broncos led the game 10-9 at halftime. Simms completed a then SB record 10 consecutive passes in the second half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts