ny33 Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Y wouldn't he be? He's a cancer who's proven to be nothing but detrimental to a team.
ICanSleepWhenI'mDead Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Isn't our owner on record as saying we need a TE that doesn't get injured?
RuntheDamnBall Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Isn't our owner on record as saying we need a TE that doesn't get injured? Sure, but biggest need? If we could draft a TE and he would magically play like Gronkowski from the get-go, I'd say sure, because that would add a dimension in the passing game we do not have. But I think that Gronk's rise has as much to do with his QB as it does with him (and we do not have a a QB).
Homey D. Clown Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 I had to pick Linebacker, since the QB position is also a high priority, I based mine on what the team might be able to grab in early rounds. the QB class just doesn't impress me.
ICanSleepWhenI'mDead Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Sure, but biggest need? If we could draft a TE and he would magically play like Gronkowski from the get-go, I'd say sure, because that would add a dimension in the passing game we do not have. But I think that Gronk's rise has as much to do with his QB as it does with him (and we do not have a a QB). The Interweb tubes really do need a sarcasm font.
4BillsintheBurgh Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Yeah its a tough draft there seems to be a lot of QB's in 2-5 Barkley, Nassib, Bray, Dysert, Manuel etc. but not a lot in the 1st. But it lloks to be very defensive heavy in the 1st I think it's going to be a very interesting draft with regards to the players taken. Everyone's talking about all the defensive talent, but with all the offensive coaches hired this offseason I wouldn't be surprised if the offensive players are overdrafted in the first round. It seems most of the front offices are looking to improve their offenses instead of their defenses. It may leave a decent lb for us in the second round, but maybe not a wr or qb.
BuffBill Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 This team will continue to be a joke and never be taken seriously until they get a franchise quarterback, or at least one that can throw 25 yards downfield.
DanInSouthBuffalo Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 (edited) I had to say CB. Gilmore is the only real starter; McGee should retire, Williams can't play, McKelvin is unrestricted, and that leaves unproven Ron Brooks and Justin Rogers. Having said that imagine if we were able to draft Kuechly last year. Gilmore was a good pick I think though. 1. DB 2. LB 3. QB Edited February 5, 2013 by DanInSouthBuffalo
The Wiz Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 (edited) The Interweb tubes really do need a sarcasm font. I think bazooka font would do the job. Gotta say LB is the most important but don't know about at the 8th pick. Edited February 5, 2013 by The Wiz
boyst Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Biggest need is qb. That doesn't mean it needs to be our first or second pick.
Bufcomments Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 We need LB's in the worst way. but QB trumps that's because they can win a Super Bowl for you. I would be happy with a LB-QB or QB LB in the first 2 rounds. Then another LB, WR, and another LB....and another LB lol
Dibs Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 Biggest need is qb. That doesn't mean it needs to be our first or second pick. Was that sarcasm?
Malazan Posted February 5, 2013 Posted February 5, 2013 I've gotta say Linebacker. The QB position has to be upgraded, but I think you can survive with Fitzpatrick. The defense allowing the other team's offense to operate like it was a track meet is a big problem.
Recommended Posts