3rdnlng Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/26/Palin-We-Havent-Yet-Begun-to-Fight-Exclusive-Interview-with-Breitbart-News Palin: 'We Haven't Yet Begun to Fight!'—Exclusive Interview with Breitbart News 4732 11 11.1K -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Where do you think the country stands at the beginning of the President's 2nd term? Before the November election I wrote that we all know what Obama’s second term will look like because we’ve seen his first. I said: “We know what we will get from a second Obama term. We will get the same failed policies. We will get Obamacare locked into law. We will get a debt crisis. We will get more inflation and higher gas prices. We will get tax increases. We will get fewer jobs. We will get more small businesses collapsing under the weight of higher taxes and unfair regulation. We will get more corruption and crony capitalism favoring the Obama administration’s friends. We will get less domestic energy development and increased dependence on terrorist sponsoring foreign regimes for our energy needs. We will get a 'blame America first' foreign policy that bows to our enemies and snubs our friends like Israel and leaves America and the world less safe. We will get less opportunity and security for ourselves and for our children.” Predicting the future has never been easier because here we are! Already we see higher taxes, a stagnant economy, the same inflationary monetary policies, Obamacare looming like a dark cloud over small businesses, yet another demand for “debt ceiling” increases, continued stonewalling about the tragic Benghazi attacks, a Secretary of Defense nominee who has a history of being antagonistic to our ally Israel, and the attack on our Second Amendment rights by an administration that has no respect for the Constitution or the separation of powers. The problem is that some on the Right are now skittish because of the lost 2012 election. They shouldn’t be. Conservatism didn’t lose. A moderate Republican candidate lost after he was perceived to alienate working class Reagan Democrat and Independent voters who didn’t turn out for him as much as they did for the McCain/Palin ticket in 2008. Granted, those same voters also didn’t turn out for Obama as strongly either. We had an election defined by a biased media plus millions of voters who sat it out in disgust. As long as we allow the media and GOP establishment to tell us who our nominees must be, we can expect to lose. I’m not interested in losing. America’s next generation can’t afford another loss. 3. The MSM have declared both you and the Tea Party dead and buried. Reaction? I was raised to never retreat and to pick battles wisely, and all in due season. When it comes to defending our republic, we haven’t begun to fight! But we delight in those who underestimate us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 All very straightforward,and honest opinion from Gov. Palin. She will continue to be a strong advocate and spokesperson for many, many Americans. Of course, much of the simple-minded, cliched beliefs about her will probably be repeated later in this thread, it will be funny in a sad way. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 (edited) Well she hit all her buzzwords. After being snubbed in her fox news contract apparently by not getting many appearances as she wanted and by not being respected by various producers, glad to see she can at least do some interviews still. Politics just isn't the same without the wild child from the wilderness. I would be interested to know who she thinks they should have picked...Santorum? Moving forward...Santorum again? Edited January 27, 2013 by SameOldBills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 27, 2013 Author Share Posted January 27, 2013 All very straightforward,and honest opinion from Gov. Palin. She will continue to be a strong advocate and spokesperson for many, many Americans. Of course, much of the simple-minded, cliched beliefs about her will probably be repeated later in this thread, it will be funny in a sad way. . You mean we should expect some hissy fits? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meathead Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 oh lord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 27, 2013 Author Share Posted January 27, 2013 Well she hit all her buzzwords. After being snubbed in her fox news contract apparently by not getting many appearances as she wanted and by not being respected by various producers, glad to see she can at least do some interviews still. Politics just isn't the same without the wild child from the wilderness. I would be interested to know who she thinks they should have picked...Santorum? Moving forward...Santorum again? Bman was right. how do you know she was snubbed? And if she was, wouldn't that make her higher in your standing, since she was "snubbed" by Fox? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Bman was right. how do you know she was snubbed? And if she was, wouldn't that make her higher in your standing, since she was "snubbed" by Fox? I don't really know nobody will. There are a few articles floating around claiming that she was unhappy that she had limited appearances and almost nothing towards the very end of her contract, and that various producers at fox called her stupid and made fun of her to coworkers behind the scenes. Ultimately she rejected the contract which if she wants to continue to be an outspoken advocate for...whoever it is she represents....you would think $1M gift for the opportunity to selectively appear on fox as a contributor would be something she wants...unless of course she wasn't getting on enough and/or felt they didn't appreciate/respect/value her...it's all speculation of course since no sources accusing their boss of calling her stupid will be named and neither side will comment about the regularity of her appearances and both just say "good luck to her/fox" respectively... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigfatbillsfan Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 All very straightforward,and honest opinion from Gov. Palin. She will continue to be a strong advocate and spokesperson for many, many Americans. Of course, much of the simple-minded, cliched beliefs about her will probably be repeated later in this thread, it will be funny in a sad way. . OK, that's her opinion. However, I'm not going to put much weight behind the opinion of a failed VP nominee who quit half way thru her only term as governor. I don't know why anyone else would either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 So, you got your Sarah over here; you got your Hill'ry over there...at least the former knows enough to comb her hair. To be fair, the latter was extremely busy resolving international affairs, taming knotty disputes and logging miles in search of world peace. As Jerry Lee Lewis would say, "Breathless...a" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 27, 2013 Author Share Posted January 27, 2013 (edited) I don't really know nobody will. There are a few articles floating around claiming that she was unhappy that she had limited appearances and almost nothing towards the very end of her contract, and that various producers at fox called her stupid and made fun of her to coworkers behind the scenes. Ultimately she rejected the contract which if she wants to continue to be an outspoken advocate for...whoever it is she represents....you would think $1M gift for the opportunity to selectively appear on fox as a contributor would be something she wants...unless of course she wasn't getting on enough and/or felt they didn't appreciate/respect/value her...it's all speculation of course since no sources accusing their boss of calling her stupid will be named and neither side will comment about the regularity of her appearances and both just say "good luck to her/fox" respectively... Do you have any links to those articles "floating around"? And if you do will they be any different than your pure conjecture and speculation? B-man was right about the comments that the simple minded people would make. Edited January 27, 2013 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Do you have any links to those articles "floating around"? Go to the Huffington Post. They haven't been this excited since the release of Palin's emails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 (edited) Meanwhile under Barack "Change We Can Believe In" Obama the wealthy get wealthier, the poor are worse off than in 2008, minorities and women are worse off economically than in 2008, no new jobs, more illegal immigrants were deported under Obama than under George Bush, and the US still has an aggressive policy in Afghanistan. It's funny to watch ignorant-stupid liberal democrats say that they still support Obama. They still don't realize how bad they've been fooled by Obama's political handlers who give Obama his teleprompter script to Obama and Obama simply reads their words off the teleprompter. Liberal-Democrats should have figured this out in 2008 when Obama never disclosed his college grades. Bet: Things will be even better for the wealthy and worse for women and minorities by 2016. Edited January 27, 2013 by PearlHowardman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 27, 2013 Author Share Posted January 27, 2013 Go to the Huffington Post. They haven't been this excited since the release of Palin's emails. I gave that assignment out to SOB or TNB (whatever he wants to call himself) to do. It's better to keep him busy finding references for his claims than posting here about why Obama should be able to usurp the constitution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Come In Peace Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 It's funny to watch ignorant-stupid liberal democrats say that they still support Obama. They still don't realize how bad they've been fooled by Obama's political handlers who give Obama his teleprompter script to Obama and Obama simply reads their words off the teleprompter. So you believe Obama has no say whatsoever in his policy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 So you believe Obama has no say whatsoever in his policy? Hey, look who stopped playing "spaceman" long enough to ask a question. Mr. Obama is certainly in agreement with the policies and with the use of the TOTUS. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We Come In Peace Posted January 27, 2013 Share Posted January 27, 2013 Hey, look who stopped playing "spaceman" long enough to ask a question. Mr. Obama is certainly in agreement with the policies and with the use of the TOTUS. . Only because I'm sober. Wait until after noon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PearlHowardman Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 So you believe Obama has no say whatsoever in his policy? Barack Obama is an empty headed dolt whom only reads what his handlers write on teleprompters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 (edited) She's a Diva that has perfected the art of repeating folksy sounding talking points. She didn't like the way she was being treated at FOX, which led to many disagreements with the producers and upper ups at FOX, they low balled a contract offer just so that they wouldn't alienate the Sarah fans knowing full well that she wouldn't accept the honor, essentially getting rid of the Diva. Edited January 29, 2013 by Magox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 29, 2013 Author Share Posted January 29, 2013 She's a Diva that has perfected the art of repeating folksy sounding talking points. She didn't like the way she was being treated at FOX, which led to many disagreements with the producers and upper ups at FOX, they low balled a contract offer just so that they wouldn't alienate the Sarah fans knowing full well that she wouldn't accept the honor, essentially getting rid of the Diva. What did you think of her answers in the OP? They didn't sound too "folksy". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 (edited) What did you think of her answers in the OP? They didn't sound too "folksy". I wasn't referring to that, but I agree with what she said there for the most part. Edited January 29, 2013 by Magox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts