DallasBillsFan1 Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 If Bills hire Pettine (from Jets), that may mean Bills go back to 3-4 as that scheme is what he used his entire career. If that happens, how does super Mario handle the switch? Isn't he a 4-3 guy?
BobChalmers Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 There's a few threads on this already. Mario was a 3-4 OLB his last season in Houston though, to answer your specific question. Had 5 sacks in 5 games before he tore his pectoral.
SBUffalo Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 Doesn't matter how effective Mario is in the 3-4, no matter what his position is there he'll be overpaid for that position. As, I believe, Tim Graham pointed out he would be BY FAR the highest paid 3-4 DE in league history if he was there, then if you look around the league it's not hard to find that pass rushing OLB for the 3-4. If you have speed and strength then you're going to be effective.
apuszczalowski Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 There's a few threads on this already. Mario was a 3-4 OLB his last season in Houston though, to answer your specific question. Had 5 sacks in 5 games before he tore his pectoral. But I don't think he was happy playing in a 3-4, and one fo the reasons he came to Buffalo was that he preffered playing in a 4-3 IIRC
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 He's around JJ Watt's size, and hes been crushing it in the 3-4. I don't think he wants to be locked in as a 3-4 end or OLB, but if he can do both I'm sure he'd be fine.
Dr. Trooth Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 It's going to be an attacking D.... I don't see Mario bringing off the edge from a speed perspective. His forte is size and strength. I see Moats as the only pure 3-4 OLB on the roster. Anderson seems to fit the mold at the other OLB.
mattsox Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 If Bills hire Pettine (from Jets), that may mean Bills go back to 3-4 as that scheme is what he used his entire career. If that happens, how does super Mario handle the switch? Isn't he a 4-3 guy? It ought to be Interesting. If they switch to 3-4, I guess that means it's time to Draft 4 LBs or Sign some via FA. WE DON"T HAVE LBs that are difference makers on this team!
auburnbillsbacker Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 (edited) If the bills switch to the 3-4 I predict the bills will struggle and Marone will be fired after completing his 3rd season. I could see the bills using the Buddy Ryan/Gregg Williams 46 defense. Edited January 9, 2013 by auburnbillsbacker
Never NEVER Give-up Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 It ought to be Interesting. If they switch to 3-4, I guess that means it's time to Draft 4 LBs or Sign some via FA. WE DON"T HAVE LBs that are difference makers on this team! This!! We have no LB's worth a darn. Barnett is a good 3rd man IF you had 2 other good LB's!! Switching to a 34 would mean we need even more LB's. Let's walk before we run!! I'd prefer we stay in a base 43 and add wrinkles. To have a 34 you need a Ted Washington (remember those days!?!?) to eat up space on the interior. Dareus and K-Williams are penetrators, best suited to an attacking 43, but everyone looks bad in this defense when the LB's don't make plays.
KeisterHollow Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 I don't want to see 2 year growing pains out of this defense, and I don't think Petine or Marrone want to, either. I'd bet they want nothing more than to come out of the gates bangin! So, I wouldn't be surprised to see Petine modify his preferences to the personnel he has. In fact, that was a big thing for Marrone - play to the strength of the team - and, I have to imagine its what he was looking for in assistants. Still, I'd love to see a truly Hybrid defense here. I want the Bills to be able to think outside of the box, to be the trend setters - and, as long as we're aggressive, mean, fast, and hard hitting, I'll be happy. That nasty, tough element of good defenses has been lacking here for a long time. Even, these past few years, when the Bills would be playing lights out football on defense for, say, three quarters, you still got the impression that it was a soft defense PUTTING ON A SHOW - that before long they'd revert back to getting smoked. And, sure enough, they always did. I want a defense whose nature is MEAN, TOUGH, HARD HITTING. Like the Jets, or San Fran, or Pittsburgh - a defense that is always good, no matter which players are on the field. That is a reflection of coaching. And, I'm sooooo happy to finally know we've got one of the coaches now to make that happen!
San-O Posted January 9, 2013 Posted January 9, 2013 I don't want to see 2 year growing pains out of this defense, and I don't think Petine or Marrone want to, either. I'd bet they want nothing more than to come out of the gates bangin! So, I wouldn't be surprised to see Petine modify his preferences to the personnel he has. In fact, that was a big thing for Marrone - play to the strength of the team - and, I have to imagine its what he was looking for in assistants. Still, I'd love to see a truly Hybrid defense here. I want the Bills to be able to think outside of the box, to be the trend setters - and, as long as we're aggressive, mean, fast, and hard hitting, I'll be happy. That nasty, tough element of good defenses has been lacking here for a long time. Even, these past few years, when the Bills would be playing lights out football on defense for, say, three quarters, you still got the impression that it was a soft defense PUTTING ON A SHOW - that before long they'd revert back to getting smoked. And, sure enough, they always did. I want a defense whose nature is MEAN, TOUGH, HARD HITTING. Like the Jets, or San Fran, or Pittsburgh - a defense that is always good, no matter which players are on the field. That is a reflection of coaching. And, I'm sooooo happy to finally know we've got one of the coaches now to make that happen! THIS !!! YEAH!!! + 10
Recommended Posts