TC in St. Louis Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 I heard he is not returning to the Redskins. He and Firemarshall don't play well together. Any takers?
reddogblitz Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 If this is indeed true that he's not going back to Deadskins I'd love to have him. I love what he did in Washington. His plans for the last 2 weeks against Dallas and Seattle were really good. He is aggressive and brings the (Red Dog) Blitz which I really like. Since we have a neophyte HC, we need real pro quality Coordinators and assistants.
NoSaint Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 If this is indeed true that he's not going back to Deadskins I'd love to have him. I love what he did in Washington. His plans for the last 2 weeks against Dallas and Seattle were really good. He is aggressive and brings the (Red Dog) Blitz which I really like. Since we have a neophyte HC, we need real pro quality Coordinators and assistants. strikes: he runs the 34 hes burned a lot of buffalo bridges hes an idiot this has been a good season, but he has a lot of lackluster ones on the resume
LabattBlue Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Return of the Bermuda Triangle? Where do Smerlas and Nelson fit into the equation?
K-9 Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 I heard he is not returning to the Redskins. He and Firemarshall don't play well together. Any takers? That is some pure comedy gold right there. GO BILLS!!!
rpcolosi Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 um no thanks. lots of other DCs I'd take over him, especially if Horton and Lovie are available.
BobChalmers Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 strikes: he runs the 34 hes burned a lot of buffalo bridges hes an idiot this has been a good season, but he has a lot of lackluster ones on the resume Funny thing is, depsite the "big switch to a 4-3" this season, adding Mario and Anderson arguably has the Bills set up better for a 3-4 than a 4-3. Both guys are OLB's in a 3-4, which means they are only 1 ILB away instead of needing an OLB and an MLB to stay with the 4-3. Put another way, a 3-4 is in many ways really a 5-2, and the Bills have a lot more talent at DL than they do at LB, obviously.
eball Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 For whatever reason, and allegiances to former Buffalo Bills aside, Haslett just seems rather buffoonish. Not what I envision out of a coach Marrone brings to town.
bobobonators Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Funny thing is, depsite the "big switch to a 4-3" this season, adding Mario and Anderson arguably has the Bills set up better for a 3-4 than a 4-3. Both guys are OLB's in a 3-4, which means they are only 1 ILB away instead of needing an OLB and an MLB to stay with the 4-3. Put another way, a 3-4 is in many ways really a 5-2, and the Bills have a lot more talent at DL than they do at LB, obviously. good post. i agree. Dareus and KW both played better in the 3-4 last season too. switching back to a 3-4 wouldn't be that big of a deal imo. that being said, i don't want Haslett.
NoSaint Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Funny thing is, depsite the "big switch to a 4-3" this season, adding Mario and Anderson arguably has the Bills set up better for a 3-4 than a 4-3. Both guys are OLB's in a 3-4, which means they are only 1 ILB away instead of needing an OLB and an MLB to stay with the 4-3. Put another way, a 3-4 is in many ways really a 5-2, and the Bills have a lot more talent at DL than they do at LB, obviously. that assumes both high priced guys who left 34 teams for our 43 would be happy about the change. i know, i know, shut up and play, but its a real consideration.
reddogblitz Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 (edited) He almost had the Seahawks number yeah exactly. I never was a big Haslett guy after his failure in NO. However, after watching the games the last 2 weeks, he had dialed up great plans vs two explosive offensive teams. It's not his fault Shanahan abandoned the run to Morris and let a one legged QB that couldn't pass for beans carry the team. They did hold Seattle to 21 not counting the gift at the 5 yard line late which only turned into 3 btw. And I don't care if he runs the 43, 34, 46, flex, or the 16 Umbrella defense as long as it works. Edited January 7, 2013 by reddogblitz
Stealth Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 Haslett as a d coordinator in a second without question.
bills1960 Posted January 7, 2013 Posted January 7, 2013 What incentive would he have to come here and leave his current job other than he played here?
TC in St. Louis Posted January 8, 2013 Author Posted January 8, 2013 This is what I was told by a friend. Haslett's agent told him that he was trying to get an interview with the Bills. He told me that Saturday before they announced the hiring of the new coach. He said Haslett was leaving Washington no matter what, that Shanahan was "a handful." Actually, his text reads that he has arranged an interview with Haslett in Buffalo. I asked him if it was for DC, he said probably. He is leaving Washington no matter what. That's a legit source, but who knows?
BringBackFergy Posted January 8, 2013 Posted January 8, 2013 This is what I was told by a friend. Haslett's agent told him that he was trying to get an interview with the Bills. He told me that Saturday before they announced the hiring of the new coach. He said Haslett was leaving Washington no matter what, that Shanahan was "a handful." Actually, his text reads that he has arranged an interview with Haslett in Buffalo. I asked him if it was for DC, he said probably. He is leaving Washington no matter what. That's a legit source, but who knows? Thanks for the info
NoSaint Posted January 8, 2013 Posted January 8, 2013 Thanks for the info I'd say grain of salt - haslett likely didnt have an interview lined up before we signed our coach.
BringBackFergy Posted January 8, 2013 Posted January 8, 2013 NoSaint- get over to the Irish Bama live game thread.
San Jose Bills Fan Posted January 8, 2013 Posted January 8, 2013 http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/154300-jim-haslett/page__hl__haslett 70 posts recent
ganesh Posted January 8, 2013 Posted January 8, 2013 Funny thing is, depsite the "big switch to a 4-3" this season, adding Mario and Anderson arguably has the Bills set up better for a 3-4 than a 4-3. Both guys are OLB's in a 3-4, which means they are only 1 ILB away instead of needing an OLB and an MLB to stay with the 4-3. Put another way, a 3-4 is in many ways really a 5-2, and the Bills have a lot more talent at DL than they do at LB, obviously. It could work especially if Carrington can play DE along with Dareus. Then Kyle Williams will be the Nose Tackle. The one concern will be Kyle WIlliams if he can block any bull rushing. The biggest issue would be depth on the DL. Either way, they would need to draft more for the front seven. At least this will put their 7 best players on the field.
Recommended Posts