LabattBlue Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 If this has been posted and discussed already, I apologize, but I heard on WGR on the way home from work that Wire was inactive for Sundays game. Did not sound like it was related to any injury he had, but I did not hear the full discussion.
ROCCEO Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 sounds like he's headed for the chopping block. It's too bad, despite his many shortcomings I was always a coy fan.
cashfruit Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 i heard him talkin yesterday on the brad riter show, he said he was inactive because they had to carry and extra o-lineman.
LabattBlue Posted January 6, 2005 Author Posted January 6, 2005 I don't know where to find the info, but was Wire our ST captain?
theNose76 Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 Stamer was ST captain, saw him go out to the coin-toss, didn't realize Wire wasn't dressed. Also noticed that Tim Anderson dressed, think that might have been his first game.
cashfruit Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 i thought he was, but somethin tells me it could be crowell or haggan.
John from Riverside Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 Speaking of which....how about Josh Stamer? He looks like a keeper to me
#89 Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 Coy is the captain - Stamer did the coin toss because Coy wasn't dressed. I think it must have been a last min thing because I saw Coy's Dad in the fieldhouse and I don't think he would have come if Coy wasn't playing.
stevewin Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 Another hard pill for the Coy crowd to swallow - more evidence that our boy Coy is just 'decent' and 'replaceable' on STs after all. Or another way to think of it - his liability of not providing competent depth at his defensive position is not overcome by his contributions on STs.
LabattBlue Posted January 6, 2005 Author Posted January 6, 2005 Another hard pill for the Coy crowd to swallow - more evidence that our boy Coy is just 'decent' and 'replaceable' on STs after all. Or another way to think of it - his liability of not providing competent depth at his defensive position is not overcome by his contributions on STs. 195308[/snapback] Steve...when I posted this thread, I knew you would appreciate it!
stevewin Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 Steve...when I posted this thread, I knew you would appreciate it! 195458[/snapback]
nobody Posted January 6, 2005 Posted January 6, 2005 more evidence that our boy Coy is just 'decent' and 'replaceable' on STs after all. Did you think the STs had a good game against Pitt? I don't think it was one of their better ones.
Recommended Posts