Thailog80 Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 Mark....you and I could get the 9ers to 3-13. Can I have a coordinators job on your coaching staff?
Alaska Darin Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 ANYONE who takes that job better not plan on being there 3 years from now. That franchise is a disaster and no NFL coach could win there. I'm not defending Erickson but that roster is about 30 players short on NFL talent.
kota Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 That's what happens when a women is in charge of a mans sport.
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 Leinart would be one smart kid to not even entertain the idea of playing for that team. Too bad SF might have the #1 pick in '06 as well.
/dev/null Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 wouldn't surprise me to see ol' greggg there next year
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 That's what happens when a women is in charge of a mans sport. 194571[/snapback] Juanita York?
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 That's what happens when a women is in charge of a mans sport. 194571[/snapback] I think she gave the job to her husband right away. Bad, stupid and sexist statement, regardless. Lord knows all women should be home vacuuming and popping out kids. [/sarcasm]
OnTheRocks Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 it's not so much Erickson...although he is a really bad coach....as it is Terry Donahue. That guy has an ego bigger than George Stienbrenner.....and should have been gone long ago. having said that....i think if they do wack Donahue next you can expect to see Dwight Clark be the GM and Holmgren come over and be the HC.
Mark VI Posted January 5, 2005 Author Posted January 5, 2005 ANYONE who takes that job better not plan on being there 3 years from now. That franchise is a disaster and no NFL coach could win there. 194553[/snapback] Sounds like a job for Jim Haslett, after he's fired in the next few days.
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 it's not so much Erickson...although he is a really bad coach....as it is Terry Donahue. That guy has an ego bigger than George Stienbrenner.....and should have been gone long ago. having said that....i think if they do wack Donahue next you can expect to see Dwight Clark be the GM and Holmgren come over and be the HC. 194578[/snapback] Isn't Holmgren still under contract?
Ramius Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 i hope they hire crennel away from the patsies...not only does the guy deserve a shot at a HC job, it also hurts a main rival...
kota Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 Yes it is sexiest like omg no way. It was my understanding that the current owner (female) ousted the old owner and then let her faithful husband run the team. Then you get a team making cost cuts and left themself with a high school team.
OnTheRocks Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 Isn't Holmgren still under contract? 194580[/snapback] he might be...but he also isn't setting the world on fire in Seattle. I think if he loses to the Rams at home this weekend he is as good as gone...but i also think he and Paul Allen might sit down and decide to have a friendly mutual parting of the ways.
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 i hope they hire crennel away from the patsies...not only does the guy deserve a shot at a HC job, it also hurts a main rival... 194583[/snapback] They will have to hurry up. Browns are already looking at Crennell.
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 Yes it is sexiest like omg no way. 194584[/snapback] In English, please? It was my understanding that the current owner (female) ousted the old owner and then let her faithful husband run the team. Then you get a team making cost cuts and left themself with a high school team. 194584[/snapback] That doesn't say anything to me about female owners, while it says more to me about cheap idiots. Explain St. Louis winning a championship. Or did they win with a smart male GM despite the shortcomings of the owner? Your generalization sucks.
UConn James Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 Leinart would be one smart kid to not even entertain the idea of playing for that team. Too bad SF might have the #1 pick in '06 as well. 194573[/snapback] Eli Manning was only the most recent case study that if you tell a team you WILL NOT play for them under any circumstances, other arrangements are made. You'll likely make about $5-7M less on the signing bonus, but if that means playing for a winner, some guys will do that. If I were Leinart, I wouldn't want to go there. Lots of pressure being the area pick and the savior to a team that resembles Swiss cheese.
Recommended Posts