seq004 Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 My god listening to talk radio all day and listening to how much talent Cleveland has and why that would be so attractive for Kelly and how much talent Kansas City has and that Andy Reid made the right decision makes absolutely no sense to me did anybody watch these teams this year?
HamSandwhich Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 I don't get it either. It's the Bills though, always overlooked.
NoSaint Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 My god listening to talk radio all day and listening to how much talent Cleveland has and why that would be so attractive for Kelly and how much talent Kansas City has and that Andy Reid made the right decision makes absolutely no sense to me did anybody watch these teams this year? cleveland finished strong becoming a media darling, add a qb to KC and they have a very good team. did you watch much of either outside of our games?
NickelCity Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 I'm also baffled as to why Cleveland is being talked about as a more attractive landing spot than Buffalo.
HamSandwhich Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 cleveland finished strong becoming a media darling, add a qb to KC and they have a very good team. did you watch much of either outside of our games? Yeah, Cleveland played better as the season progressed, I'll give you that, we weren't arguing that however. The Bills have more overall talent, IMO, than either of those two teams. KC, that's a laugh, KC really isn't that good with or w/o a QB.
Punch Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 Part of it's funny because this season the Bills beat both teams.
The Wiz Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 I'm also baffled as to why Cleveland is being talked about as a more attractive landing spot than Buffalo. Obviously they have a better waterfront.
seq004 Posted January 4, 2013 Author Posted January 4, 2013 (edited) cleveland finished strong becoming a media darling, add a qb to KC and they have a very good team. did you watch much of either outside of our games? I live in Columbus so I watched plenty of Browns games watched 3 Kansas City games and firmly believe that our roster is better than both those teams. Besides didn't we crush both teams? Edited January 4, 2013 by seq004
You herd it hear last Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 I live in Columbus so I watched plenty of Browns games watched 3 Kansas City games and firmly believe that our roster is better than both those teams. Besides didn't we crush both teams? my condolences
RealityCheck Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 If those coaches really think that those rosters are better then have at it. I would rather lose the perception competition and win then the other way around. Winning would solve many problems.
Dorkington Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 The Bills are the biggest losers in the game. We don't have the worst record, but we have the longest drought. That says something. We have been relevant way too long.
Bronc24 Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 Sick of the "woe is me" crap. You know how you get respect? Win. Period. Quit crying.
apuszczalowski Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 Let those coaches believe it, Reid is one of the last coaches i wanted to see here, and I'm very leery on weither Kelly is going succeed for more then one year in his first time around as an NFL head coach. It is funny that the media says it, but maybe thats because its the same way everyone here feels. Just read what people write here all the time, The Bills are horrible, no talent, no one wants to come here, everyone is always better, etc.
Heitz Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 My god listening to talk radio all day and listening to how much talent Cleveland has and why that would be so attractive for Kelly and how much talent Kansas City has and that Andy Reid made the right decision makes absolutely no sense to me did anybody watch these teams this year? KC has 5 Pro Bowl players and were willing to give control to Reid (who will be bringing in his own GM and personnel guy). Despite his overall record, I'm glad the Bills didn't do that! http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000121923/article/andy-reid-kansas-city-chiefs-reach-agreement
Dorkington Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 Sick of the "woe is me" crap. You know how you get respect? Win. Period. Quit crying. BOOM
section122 Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 But the Chiefs had 5 pro bowlers this year!!!!
apuszczalowski Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 Sick of the "woe is me" crap. You know how you get respect? Win. Period. Quit crying. Yup, thats how the Chiefs and Browns got the respect they are getting in the media......................
Dorkington Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 But the Chiefs had 5 pro bowlers this year!!!! I'm sure someone will chime in that it's just a popularity contest. Face it, guys. We suck. Our SoV was second worst in the league, so even though we didn't have the least amount of wins, the ones we did get were against terrible teams. Our record was better than our talent and coaching staff. Yup, thats how the Chiefs and Browns got the respect they are getting in the media...................... Both teams have been relevant more recently than the Bills. Both teams have pro bowl players.
eball Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 KC has 5 Pro Bowl players and were willing to give control to Reid (who will be bringing in his own GM and personnel guy). Despite his overall record, I'm glad the Bills didn't do that! http://www.nfl.com/n...reach-agreement Pro Bowl Schmo Bowl. Tell me Spiller, Byrd, McKelvin didn't belong on an NFL all-star team? The Pro Bowl is a popularity contest whose purpose is solely as a contract incentive.
Bronc24 Posted January 4, 2013 Posted January 4, 2013 Yup, thats how the Chiefs and Browns got the respect they are getting in the media...................... Who cares? How is this even an issue?
Recommended Posts